When it doesn't work, do more of the same?

This forum post was born when 2,8% of the having the right to vote people in Colorado gave a win to probably the weakest version of the white republican obama. How did it happen that we allow this tiny fraction of hardly inspired people to decide the fate of the presidency?

Let me first lay forward a few definitions: The people that have gone to the polls so far and cast their vote I call active voters. These people decide the primaries and they represent a tiny % of the possible voters. In my estimate they are between 1%-45% and we get about 15% of this vote. Note that this is relatively fair, considering these people use MSM to get information, so our % represents the coverage of RP. The road to this fraction of the population is through the MSM, which means it will come down to money. Somehow this doesn't seem the right path.

/A brief mention of the MSM. Now many of us are very pissed at them, but don't forget they are simply acting in their best interest. They collect money from advertisers, and then return favors in PR. Even Ron Paul campaign pays for interviews, and you can tell rather easily which ones are paid for/.

The people that do not take part in these primaries I call hidden voters. Some of them are obviously these people that are lazy active voters, who cannot be swayed, but I believe the majority of people are indeed not satisfied by the candidates (which, unfortunately includes our candidate).
I split hidden voters in 2 - people which are not buying what the corporate media is selling (maybe will buy in the general election) and people who simply do not trust MSM for information and haven't gotten around to the message yet through the alternative channels.

So we come to the main point of this post. It is very hard and expensive to go through the MSM channels for the active voters. We must target the "non MSM watching" hidden voters. They are the "new" people. How do we do it of course is a different matter. Since we rule the Internet, the new people are not online. Please post here suggestions that could be sent to the campaign. I believe we need a game changer. I don't believe the current strategy can give us enough momentum to win big in the winner take all big state primaries.

Here is my modest proposal. It uses a bit of psychology and gaming theory. Focus strong on a single state where we could win really big, but focus on hidden voters. Do not approach them with TV adds, cold calling and rallies. I believe the organization must win those minds. We cannot count only on Ron Paul showing up on TV and in meetings. One individual has physical limitations to the number of people he can reach in person. The local organization must come up with the answer.

Kansas is a small state holding caucus on March 10. Huckaby took it in 2008 with 11,000 votes! RP was third with 2700 or 11%. There are 750 000 registered republicans and 460 000 democrats in the state. Motivating only 5% of these people will give Ron Paul a landslide victory. Strategy is evaluated and adjusted. We must target at least 3 times the total number of primary voters compared to the 2008 election. Then we move on. The experiment could run in several states, since Ron Paul does not have to be present everywhere.
Next step will be the large winner take all states. Just 2 of those and Ron Paul will lead. After all, it is all about changing minds and hearts, not cheating the election process through the delegate system.

My thoughts in conclusion, we need new people to start voting because they believe in something. If we somehow manage to bribe our way to the active voters through the media to squeeze a win, it will not be enough. Remember that in order to execute his plan, Ron Paul must bulldozer through the Congress. To be able to do that, he needs big mandate from the people. (I am talking general election now). When I see dissatisfied people and low turnouts, I see an opening. Let's take it! Please again post ideas how this campaign should adjust (without adjusting the essence of the message, of course).