RED ALERT! Electronic Voting - Elections are predetermined - No way to win.
Submitted by Apple on Mon, 02/13/2012 - 08:00We need suggestions to block electronic voting. We need an audit trail or all this effort is for nothing.
For those that keep saying there is no proof, are missing the point. Without being able to audit the results, you are required to have 100% faith in the handlers who control it. At least with Iowa, Nevada and Maine there is evidence to be analyzed and audited. In South Carolina there is no evidence to audit. That's the point, just like auditing the FED.
We need to generate our own evidence by having exit polls in all electronic voting states. Then, you will have some proof (evidence) to argue.
How many precincts are in South Carolina, there are 3000 in Georgia? Only 2300 people sampled to make projection?
Links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OynCgwmD-HM
http://www.electronic-vote.org/
http://drudgereport.com/flash1.htm
http://www.wanttoknow.info/electionsfraud
We should start by questioning all the networks and find out who they are getting their information from, a detailed analysis of their exit polling and questioning their expert who analyzes the info and projects these winners.
Then cross reference this info with the demographic break downs they put forth.
Then question the election company their code and their analysis and expert. Where do the voting machines send their info to. Who gets the raw data. Analyze the software code, its only a few candidates it shouldn't be too complicated.
In 2004 Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting went to Forida........
just after GW Bush was re-elected. She with a group of people she brought with her were there to prove or disprove Election/Voter Fraud. There present at one of the Florida precincts was Bev Harris, a computer scientist from Belgium, a representative from Diebold (now called ES&S) and a few other people who were there as witnesses. The computer scientist removed the memory card from the Diebold machine and within 10 seconds was able to alter the figures on the memory card proving that it could not only be accomplished but that it could be done very quickly (less than 10 seconds). You should have seen the look on the Diebold Representative's face. A complete look of utter disbelief/shock. Just before the computer scientist proved this could be done, the Diebold guy commented that it was literally impossible to accomplish such a feat. To view the 2004 video, Go to Bev Harris's site: WWW.BLACKBOXVOTING.ORG
Quit spreading this video
2381 taken randomly throughout a state is a perfectly valid sample size to get 95% confidence with +/- 3% margin of error.
This video is essentially FUD exploiting lack of understanding of statistics. So yes, they were a little underhanded in jumping the gun just on their exit poll, and maybe (just maybe) they fiddled with the numbers WITHIN that exit poll, but you can't discredit the way they did their statistics and the conclusions they drew from them.
Let this video die, please.
How did they do their numbers?
and why is it they ALL use the exact same company and play it off as if they did it on their own?
PS I have a bridge for sale.
That Vatican vote fraud
video is popping up quite often... I don't know if that's good or bad at this point. I know there's vote fraud but my question is... what is the minimum sample size in order to get results that are accurate +/- 3 or 4 percentage points? Because at this point the only word about that I can base it on is what's in that video. Because if 40 percent of 1 percent is large enough then the video is not using valid evidence to support its claims... although I have no doubt there is fraud.
There are quite a number of psyop vids made to discredit legitimate conspiracies... I hope this aint one of them because I've already shared it with a few people I know.
Some of these pysop vids will have a lot of solid, convincing and verifiable evidence at the beginning and then as you get towards the end they'll start throwing in absurd crap that is unprovable or sounds wacky. You must be careful and make sure you watch the whole vid before sending it off to your friends otherwise when you get to the part near the end of the vid that says Bush is related to Big Foot you're gonna feel very shaken and your friends will never take you seriously again.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odcGSi286a4&feature=plcp&cont...
There must be a chance Ron Paul could win, or
they wouldn't be trying to cheat him along the way. Maybe they can control the outcome of the general election, but the caucuses should be able to validate the results even with a crooked chairman like Maine and Iowa.
alan laney
IGNORE THE TROLLS!
Look, Paul just won Maine. He also got the most delegates.
We're winning.
All of these recent posts from trolls are total B.S. just trying to discourage and confuse people.
We are not leaving the GOP, we're staying in and taking it over, and it's working.
And even if there are rigged votes, that's just something we'll have to work through. And this will be solved with honest effort, transparency and hard work.
Stick to the strategy, it's working.
Paul will be the next President of the United States. It's time for maximum effort!
If you're not first...you're last! ~ Reese Bobby
In the General election
There are no delegates just straight voting. We need to be prepared. Sticking your head in the sand doesn't help. We are all trying to win, so stop Trolling.
I hope millions see this
and riots start all across the United States until every dam politician is removed from office and replaced with fair elections. This is something people SHOULD riot about. Still, it is America. People will get what they deserve at the end of the day.
Independent Exit Polling Strategy
CNN and the rest of the MSM call the winners from THEIR exit polling of less than 0.4% of the vote. Organized independent exit polls will challenge the hoax.
This is how you vote electronically:
You find a large rock outside of the polling place, you bring it in the booth with you, and then you violently smash the rigged voting screen.. have 6 of your friends do this at the same time, and they have to manually count the vote.
I would be cautious about
I would be cautious about comments like this. This person has only been here for 2 hours and is talking about taking violent action.
Must be a democrat.
Must be a democrat.
RON PAUL 2012 * Restore America * Bring The Troops Home
http://www.texasuncensored.blogspot.com
That would be awesome
Ron Paul will win 2012. Get ready for it. :)
Now that's funny
Lmfao
I live in Horry County SC and
I live in Horry County SC and I can say that other than a few people including myself that voted for Dr Paul, everyone else I know voted for Newt simply due to the debate performances. Sad but true. That said I do not know if the machines are rigged but I can say based on my polling, the Grinch was and did win by a landslide. Let's hope this does not happen again.
It is so nice to have such negative post
Post like this are so uplifting and really motivate people, not! I hate to use the t word but it really gets old.
RickStone
What is
the T word?
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past you must fight just to keep them alive"
Troll
That is the t word
RickStone
It makes me more motivated
Not less.
Dannyboy of 1 week and 11 minutes...
Dannyboy or should I say Apple or what other multiple accounts that you have apparently you are motivated to make more of these negative post. Good for you.
RickStone
More motivated to fight
When I see injustice it makes me more motivated to fight against it, not give up.
Well, I guess we ought to
Well, I guess we ought to just stop trying then if it's impossible.
I would recommend to all people who are inclined to believe this stuff to brush up on statistics a little bit first. They were absolutely correct to call the race for Gingrich based on the exit polls. In statistical terms, there is very little real world difference between polling 2000 people and a million people as long as the sample is randomly selected from the population. The reason the vote percentages vary so much on TV as the votes are counted is because the votes are not counted randomly. Smaller, rural precincts generally report their votes first. Different candidates do better than others depending on the demographics of a certain district.
Exit polls are designed to be representative of the population. Precinct tallies on TV are simply reported as they are finished counting. If you gave me a choice between an exit poll of 2000 people or a 20% completed vote tally consisting of 20,000 votes, my money would be on the exit poll every time.
I'm not trying to be an ass. I just don't like it when people say there is no chance of winning because it's all rigged. That's something that other campaigns want us to think so we stop trying.
Put another way, no one
Put another way, no one company should enjoy a monopoly on the exist poll data. All the major networks use the same polling firm.
Competition breeds honesty. We need to commission a reputable organization to conduct our own exit polls.
This may be valid given an
This may be valid given an honest exit poll. However, the OP is absolutely correct when it comes to electronic voting. It's nothing short of insane trusting the results of an unauditable tally.
Lawsuit
to "depose the election company their code and their analysis and expert. Where do the voting machines send their info to. Who gets the raw data. Analyze the software code,"
I agree with your post about statistics, but we can get the ball rolling to find out just what goes on with the voting machine counts. Blackboxvoting.org has a video how to stop election fraud at the electronic voting machines
LIKE they are stupid enough to give you the
"real" code as opposed to the code they used...if you even COULD get it....ha ha
CaliforniaGirlForPaul
Did you
notice how Ron Paul, his campaign, and people here continue to bang the delegate bible here! We all know the vote is rigged! That is why Doug Wead says all candidates must stay in the race for Ron Paul to win. If Romney gets to 1,400 the game is over for us. Be a delegate. Be a delegate, Be a delegate, oh did I mention BE A DELEGATE!!! And Vote like it counts.
"Give me liberty or give me death" Patric Henry
Already articles that Dr. Paul is poaching votes
for delegates. The writing's on the wall, if he's not able to get more of the popular vote the media will try to make him look like he's stealing the vote by poaching delegates. He needs more of the popular vote too. This movement has energy, don't underestimate the power of angry voters. We can be delegates, file lawsuits, protect the vote count, spread the word on facebook, follow campaigns around with our own video since the media isn't giving us the right news.
None is proof of election fraud
also don't forget that the establishment wants us to stay home and give up. They have an easier time with their shenanigans when we stay home and don't vote.
The above isn't proof of election fraud, nor that Hoax video. Exit polling is usually done with a small sample size, that doesn't prove fraud. But I agree Ron Paul has the momentum in the GOP election and he is winning and they are doing everything they can to stop it. The entire world's central banks don't want Dr. Paul to win too, not just the United States Republicans. It's the establishment of the World vs. Dr Paul. Does this give you an idea of why we need to win this race. It's good versus evil imo.
I like the idea of filing a lawsuit.
If your right,
Then they should be more than cooperative.