|
★
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here

Something very interesting I
Something very interesting I noticed in the PDF is that in the September to November polls (and presumably before that), Ron's support was steady around 7-9%. It then jumped 5 points to 14% in December, and then has grown 1% each month in the past two months. Can anyone think why he had that little jump in December, and why he's stagnated since?
Lack of debates? Oh and the
Lack of debates? Oh and the message. I just did a post on that here - http://www.dailypaul.com/213942/just-some-thoughts
the focus of the campaign is rather strange and ridiculous. We need to stop focusing on the fed and gold. And start focusing on jobs, the economy and spending. Spending he's pretty good on but there's no reason why Romney should be beating Paul on the economy. The message just has not been developed enough to actually win. It will win some "converts" but will REALLY struggle to win actual elections.
lol
I actually generally agree
I actually generally agree with you. I feel like the biggest reasons people aren't voting for Ron Paul are 1) They think his foreign policy is crazy 2) They don't understand how his policies will create jobs 3) (mostly for older voters) they think he'll immediately cut off SS/Medicare benefits and 4) they think he's unelectable. Ron's done a good job addressing spending/debt, although I think he could tout his record more in that area. However, I think he has not focused enough of the "jobs, jobs, jobs" aspect of the economy, and I think he really needs (or needed) to drive home how he predicted the economic crisis years before it happened. I also think he hasn't explained his plan for SS/Medicare and welfare enough (or often enough). Lastly, I think the key on foreign policy is to present it in a pro-America way, and he has tried, and this is obviously a very difficult subject to address, but it could be done better/in a different manner. I also wanna say that I'm not saying all this to diss on Ron Paul or the campaign, I'm just giving some honest thoughts on how I think it could be better run.