MSM Blowback.. Maddow Reacts On Behalf of GE By Having Doug Wead On Twice In One Week Telling Romney Supporters They Are Lazy!
Submitted by AnAppealToHeavenWash on Wed, 02/15/2012 - 04:33Ok so I think I just figured this out.. Thanks to Doug Wead telling me (via MSNBC) like 10 times now. I finally get it.
WE ARE WINNING THE DELEGATES and the top exec's/shareholders at GE, Lockheed Martin, Goldman Saches, B of A, the Fed, etc are all fully crapping their pants.
The MSM BLOWBACK is as simple as this... They (The MSM) have succeeded. They have suceeded in convincing the supporters of Romney, Gingrich and Santorum that Ron Paul can't win.
This is really great for GE, the Fed and the military industrial complex right? WRONG! BLOWBACK!
You see, these three NeoCon buffoons (Newt Rick Romney) are more concerned with hiring bad actors to appear in their staged press conference backdrops as a colorful cross section of America than talking about delegates.
Besides, their supporters (at least those hard to find ones who are not on their payroll) are hardly enthused enough to go vote; its more of a "required patriotic duty" than a dedication to a particular candidate or cause.. So don't bother asking these volunteer vote casters to stay around for the boring party business after they vote, that is someone else's problem.. these LAZY APATHETIC NeoCon supporters just aren't that interested in their dude and the issues and they are not going to make that kind of complex commitment where they might have to miss their dinner. They voted, now leave them alone, that's all these LAZY, uninformed/misinformed Fox News viewers came to do. They cast their vote, now its time to hit the drive thru on their way home for their evening coffee and BigMac. DONT GET IN THEIR WAY.
Rachel Maddow (and her corporate MOB boses) are in a frenzy trying desperately to inform Mormons, NeoCon's, evangelicals and any other "group think" viewers that might listen... "RON PAUL IS STEALING YOUR ELECTION".
But those people just don't give a damn. They are doing exactly what the MSM has instructed them to do for 50 some odd years. "Go vote, and go home. Let someone else worry about the messy details, the counting and the dirty party business."
The BLOWBACK is that these loyal brainwashed viewers are doing just exactly what they have been instructed to do for so long, not even the MSM can change these institutionalized bad habits in a single election cycle. Their sheeple are doing exactly what they have been trained by the MSM to do for 50 some odd years... VOTE, go eat.
And we, the RON PAUL R3VOLUTION will be happy to decide their fate.. in Tampa.
Rachel Maddow is no fool and she is just as dirty and just as pathetic as the rest of the pundits. She is simply using Doug Wead to tell NeoCon's not to be lazy and to become delegates. But its too little too late. And Doug Wead's message to us is firing us up to do even more.
Best of all, if the MSM makes too big of a deal out of this situation, every voter will know that RON PAUL CAN WIN and then RON PAUL WILL WIN for sure... because he will quickly then become the NOT-Romney.
Besides, we already have most of the delegates.
Just ask Doug Wead.
.
Doug Wead is a huge compliment to the campaign
.
Real eyes realize real lies
2012, we want our country back
2012 is the year for Ron Paul!
And so it continues
An unbiased CSM article, shocked, really shocked!!!
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0215/Sho...
A local news station in Portland, ME is about to run this story at 6 tonight titled - Fallout Continues From Maine Caucuses
http://www.wmtw.com/news/30465013/detail.html
Winning, duh :)
The stinky mess is festering & growing at an increasing rate.
I fully expect HANDCUFFS to be placed on these criminal collaborators very soon.
Someone is going to have to be taken down and made into a scapegoat to protect the Romney campaign.
.
"Religious people fear hell...
...Spiritual people (including our Savior) have lived it." -my friend
Leave Us Alone and Bring the Troops Home
Its kinda frightening but
I just wonder what are these guys in power who are getting extremely desperate going to do with us when we keep winning and winning, I really hope we end this thing peacefully
Very interesting observation
I’m impressed with the many interesting observations in this thread… RP supporters are impressive.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odcGSi286a4&feature=plcp&cont...
Direct Democracy vs Mobocracy
I prefer direct democracy - voting in public with raised hands. Like Switzerland and old New England. That's why I like the delegate process.
Most of you have that confused with the couch potato mobocracy of electronic voting.
I've been pondering this for a while
At first glance, direct democracy as espoused by Gerald Celente does seem like mobocracy. But if done the way OregonMoney mentions, it could lead to just the kind of natural law (anarchy?) that would leave nobody in charge, and no laws could ever be enacted that weren't truly for the "common good", because it would be a giant clusterf*ck of dissenting opinion except on the most basic of natural rights, such as "though shalt not murder".
What he said!
http://www.tragedyandhope.com
http://www.im2moro.com
There is still those 20 to 30
There is still those 20 to 30 "party people" in each county that do know the process and these are the people that we MUST outnumber at each contest!
Apple nailed it in a comment below
Maddow's viewere are democrats - neo-cons are tuned into faux news and have no clue about what's coming down the pipe. Actually, she may be unknowingly converting some democrats. It's ALL good!
I don't know.. but if that's
I don't know.. but if that's the strategy. Why have Rachel Maddow do it, and not Bill O'Reilly or some other neo-con pundit? Do neo-cons even watch her?
I agree Ron Paul is winning the delegates and sending the GOP/media into wild uncontrollable hysteria though. But I think Maddow might actually be one of the decent ones. She obviously doesn't agree with a lot of his positions, but she takes him seriously. In the current media landscape, I consider that a win.
Freedom Broadcasting Network - independent grassroots network
www.fbn.tv
Nah.
I think Maddow is trying to expose the Paul campaign as being dishonest and trying to upset the voters who voted for someone else; to create some sort of animosity towards Paul which could hurt him in the long run.
But what Doug fails to mention in these interviews is that the process was dishonest in the first place. Can't hold it against us when we play by the rules, even if it's considered 'sneaky'.
End the Fed. End the Wars. Problems Solved. Ron Paul.
Did you listen to the latest interview?
Wead nails it. Maddow exposes that RP is "stealing" the election and Wead basically says "we are not stealing it. These are the rules, Santorum knows them, Romney knows them, they were actually set up to help Romney, but they are the rules and we are focused on getting delegates. If the goal was to win the beauty contests, we would adjust our strategy to try and do that, but since what really matters is delegates, we are focused on getting them."
I thought Wead nailed it, and put down any talk of "stealing" immediately and forcefully.
I get it. I'm just not going
I get it.
I'm just not going to email Maddow any time soon for a thank you note. She definitely has a motive that was not positive for the Paul campaign.
End the Fed. End the Wars. Problems Solved. Ron Paul.
yes, I agree with that.
Maddow is no friend of ours, I think she may try to use RP a little to make the GOP look bad. Which I think her motivation is here. I wasn't trying to pat her on the back, I was trying to say that Wead is Awesome!
It's kind of a Catch-22
The only way their voters can beat us is by becoming more informed about how the election process works, and getting involved in local party business. But if they do that, they won't be sheeple anymore. Spending time away from the television and in the vicinity of Ron Paul supporters is like sheeple kryptonite.
Delegates
gotta catch 'em all
End the Wars...Bring the Troops Home...A vote for the Republic, the Constitution, and Liberty... Dr. Ron Paul 2012!
thats exactly
what i say all the time...ron paul supporters always win the debate if they apply themselves because they use facts...and if someone knew enough facts to beat them in a debate then they would know enough to support ron paul over any other candidate.
Also did you notice how Maine
Also did you notice how Maine GOP chairman Charlie Webster when announcing the Maine Caucus results he was talking about that it was just a straw poll was just a beauty contest & the delegates was what really mattered only as a excuse not to count all the votes of said straw vote.
Best Valentine
Best Valentine gift I got was when my wife gave me a receipt of her registration changed from D to R! Two days before MA deadline :)
Now I will push her to be the delegate all the way to Tampa. This is Romney state so he will probably do well - and in that case I will ask her to just go ahead and pledge for Romney.
Come convention f**k 'bound pledge' and f**k RNC - vote for the good doctor in the first round.
careful
If she goes as a bound delegate for Romney, then she needs to vote Romney on the first ballot (and possibly the second, depending on the state). If she doesn't, the math will come out wrong, the vote will be invalidated, and she'll be kicked out for violating the rules. If subsequent ballots are in play, and that doesn't seem unlikely at this point, then that is where the rubber hits the road...
I know
Just venting though :)
We will go with the strategy which works best on the day of convention as agreed upon by other supporters and campaign.
Just so I understand
Are most of the non-binding caucuses not over?
I would just keep the info on the DL/down low
They don't need to know about the "stealing of delegates". The only people you should tell are the people you are trying to recruit.
When neocons claim we're stealing election through delegates...
just tell them:
- 1 Ron Paul supporter is eqaul 5 Romney supporters (or Santorum/Gingrich supporters)in terms of dedication and political activism.
- If a Romney supporter (or Santorum/Gingrich supporter)is not willing to put in the time/effort to become delegates, then WHAT does that say about how much they care about their country's future? WHAT does that say about their supposed "political activism"? It shows that the extent to which they are motivated is limited to watching Fox News on their couch and going out to vote once every 4 years (keeping your government in check is NOT that easy).
- So if Ron Paul gets the delegates because his supporters are more dedicated than the supporters of other candidates, then their dedication and political activism STILL accurately represents the power that Ron Paul will have through delegates, irrespective of the popular vote attained by other candidates.
I actually like this whole delegate process: it helps ensure that the mindless masses of sheeple don't determine our future as a result of watching Fox News and lethargically casting theri vote once every 4 years....
Take the Red Pill at www.redpillphilosophy.com New Videos, Articles, and More!
A simple quote will suffice
It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
-Samuel Adams
No need to explain further or waste time. Let them chew on that quote.
Local area TV news station,
Local area TV news station, KGAN in Cedar Rapids just put out a news story on the upcoming delegate process. I called the channel and asked why they aired the story like it was an alarm. I asked the news director why he felt the need to imply that the delegate strategy was peculiar to Ron Paul. Shouldn't all the candidates be trying to get delegates? He didn't get it or else he was just playing dumb. I happen to think that he was purposely trying to sound an alarm.
What a joker!
I'm thinking negatively
just so I'm not supprised.
Will this be the spark that gets the masses to revolt against the delegate/electoral college process and try to install some form of mob rule "direct democracy" type thing? Even if they don't succeed, the ones for that kind of thing can get pretty violent and cause all manner of laws/rules to be written for firmer establishment control...
just being a worry wart
Repubs are already
using caucus "mess" to call for eliminating them in favor of electronic straight-out voting. Certainly can't get that in place for this year, which makes this year even that much MORE important!
I don't know about
I don't know about Gingrich and Sweater Vest, but most Romney supporters seem to be looking at delegates the same way the MSM does (gee, I wonder why): "MN and CO were proportional, so Romney received about the same number of delegates as Santorum. Yep, we're doing good!"
I have had one diehard Romney supporter (she thinks I am one as well) tell me that it was very important to become a delegate for Romney (lol, I know, right?). But it looks like most Romneybots are still blissfully unaware of how the process actually works.
Disregard government. Acquire liberty.
Sweater Vest?
So weird, I pointed that out to my better half last night...LOL