Interesting video about 911 Truth that also explains hostilities to "Blowback".
Submitted by Bob-45 on Wed, 02/15/2012 - 06:35in
Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States of America
  |
User login
Daily Paul Features
Top Recent Topics
Newest & Top
New |
Top |
YouTubes |
Ron Paul 2012 |
|
|
★
|
★
Active Forum Topics
Recent Comments
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
When I want to know about baking bread I ask a baker
When I want to know about every aspect of special ops and strategy for war I go to the former, General Mac Arthur Chair, of the Army War College, Dr. Alan Sabrosky. He is also the Editor of Veterans Today.
He knows the who, how and why of 9/11.
Just Google his name and search his You Tubes.
Then you will know what the "baker" knows.
The Real Question: "Will Americans Throw Off The Chains of 100 Years of Slavery in 2012?" --Google that!
www.dailypaul.com/donate
Bump!
Great tie in to the entire purpose of Daily Paul...truth, rather than cognitive dissonance!
The "entire purpose" of DP is
The "entire purpose" of DP is to advance the agenda of Ron Paul who has REPEATEDLY said that 9-11 was NOT an inside job.
hey genious
lets see if you can grasp something here without hurting your bwain.
I know someones coming to rob/burn my house, kill my family cause I've been doing things to them IN THEIR HOME for a couple years now.
then they come and burn and raze my property and complex with all my kids families, and kill like half of them, etc.
Then I tell the people left - I didnt do it - its not an inside job.
True -inside job means that I did it.
I didnt do it.
I did what was needed to start it, fund it and ensure none got in the way of stopping it, but I didnt do it MYSELF. therefore it isnt an inside job.
Im not here in this post debating RP's opinion, Im here debating 9/11.
I frankly dont care what RP says on this topic because I can reason, I do understand coincidences and I do understand physics. AND!! last but not least I have studied enough of US history to KNOW that our government WILL hurt us if they get the chance.
and if you dont get that last part - once again, you ARE A IDIOT!
Gwinnett County Georgia
War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson
I got almost all the way
I got almost all the way through the video. They had said nothing except if you do not see that the government's story is wrong, then there is something wrong with your head. Denial. Cognitive dissonance. That sort of thing. That is no argument whether it is said once or dozens of times.
Or is Ron Paul in denial?
I thought Truther threads were automatically moved to the "Off Topic" area.
Let the down-arrows rain down like angry birds. The facts are these:
1. Ron Paul is not a Truther and has said as much on several occasions;
2. Prospective recruits come to Daily Paul who probably do not know where Ron Paul stands on the issue;
3. No doubt unfairly, many people run away screaming "kook" when the subject comes up;
4. It is not an issue in campaign '12.
Nothing to gain by discussing it here. The presidency to lose. There is a time and a place. Here and now is neither.
Ron Paul
has not said that the government story is the correct version of events. I have heard him, speaking about the 9/11 Commission, say that anything the government does must be questioned. I believe he would be open to a new investigation.
He has also said to my knowledge that he did not believe nor has he ever said that President Bush had prior knowledge of the attack. To that extent he does not believe it was an inside job.
He may have doubts however about the official story and given his prior record speaking on the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Federal Reserve cartel I believe that it is reasonable to assume that he does. This is the only point this video is making, that the government story is full of holes and the whole affair needs to be investigated. Much of the evidence has been destroyed but it is still possible to conduct an investigation.
He does work within the parameters of the official line because thus far that is all we have. He is a scientist and must base his conclusions on evidence. It is also a political hot potato at the moment and it would be foolish for him to suggest more than opening up the investigation to get at the truth.
"Where the Welfare State is on the march the Police State is not far behind."
Melchior Palyi Hungarian Economist
Well said.....everybody knows
Well said.....everybody knows that the word "truther" is short-hand for the theory that 9-11 was an "inside job." Period. I don't know of a single self-described truther who rejects that theory. Fortunately, RP flatly rejects the inside job view....even though some of his truther fans appear to be unaware of this.
liar threads
... are ok then? Truth is good. Anti-truth is bad. Just wanted to clarify that concept for you ( I was taught that fundamental concept in first grade, but hey ... maybe you were sick that day? )
»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««
Blowback?
Is that where Mossad/CIA sneak in through the back of buildings and blow them up?
Suck it.
www.wtc7.net
This also explains why people have issues
with Ron's foreign policy.
Denial.
Ron Paul is an anti-truther,
Ron Paul is an anti-truther, and properly so. This is needs to be emphasized.
I'd call that statement
... retarded but that would denigrate good people who are victims of various government-endorsed toxins and bad nutrition "advice". Ron Paul supports a new investigation of September 11th and has stated that the original "investigation" was a cover-up.
»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««
Heck, I am violently
Heck, I am violently anti-truther but support a new investigation. I am also quite sure that government officials are covering up their own incompetence. No surprise there.
That really doesn't address the crux of the issue, however. Ron Paul has said repeatedly that Bin Laden did it with no ifs, ands, or buts. He couldn't be more unambiguous. I don't believe he is lying. Do you? IMHO, we are doing RP a disservice in even implying that he thinks 9-11 was an "inside job."
atkinson
wake up!!
"violently anti-truther"? I'm a "truther" so bring your violence and see what happens.
If you seriously DO have all the knowledge that many of us here have about 9/11 and DONT think it was planned? YOU are an idiot!
Gwinnett County Georgia
War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson
Are you calling Ron Paul (who
Are you calling Ron Paul (who agrees with me in rejecting the "inside job theory" ) an "idiot" or a liar? If so, perhaps you need to find another candidate who agrees with you because Paul doesn't.
And when that new investigation
reveals that it WAS an inside job, and you have not only been WRONG, but have been an outright accessory to the tyrannizing of your country and your people, how will you "feel" about it then, and will any other people "agreeing with you" make it any less ego-deflating?
It WILL reveal that it was in inside job, because there is no other conclusion possible. It WAS an inside job, and it will come out. No "hijacked airliners full of terrorists" fly around US airspace for 90 minutes,aiming at high-value targets, without military intervention unless somebody is ordering the military to stand down. And we even have the proof in testimony from Norman Mineta who was in the bunker with Cheney when Cheney ordered the fighter jets to stand down and not intercept.
You need to learn the difference between the truth, and what you "want to hear".
You are basically a neocon who's just started getting in with Ron, and are still carrying all the GWB baggage, just like the rest of the neocons.
And as far as Ron's foreign policy goes, it can be perfectly solid, and it is. Because there was "blowback" from years of bad policy. And THAT was used as the cover for them to plant a false-flag operation in there at the WTC, and make it look believable.
Since you brand any critic of
Since you brand any critic of the "inside job" theory, apparently including Ron Paul, an "outright accessory" to tyranny I suggest you find another candidate who agrees with you. At the very least, please stop implying that RP agrees with your theory...because he has REPEATEDLY said otherwise.
You're such a twit.
I'll say anything I damn well please, anytime I want, anywhere I want, and no ignorant asshole like you is going to prevent me.
Since I've been in this fight as long or longer than Ron Paul, and know every bit as much, if not more, than him, I'll make my own decisions about what to say.
I'm not some sycophantic robot who needs to hang on every word of some candidate, like a leash. I support RP because he's for freedom, which includes freedom for what I want to say. Not because I'm in lockstep with everything he publicly says.
I suggest, since you're the ignorant newbie, that YOU find another site where they like assholes. "Little Green Footballs" comes to mind. You'd fit perfectly there.
Twit? I love you too! Your
Twit? I love you too! Your disagreement with Paul on this issue is fundamental, however, not a mere difference of opinion. If you are right, RP is a traitor because he rejects the inside job theory. I, for one, could never support a traitor....but to each his own.
Newbie? Okay, let's compare our records. I'll start. In 1980, I gathered petitions in the snows of Minnesota in support of RP's bill to abolish the selective service, in 1988 I voted for him for prez, in 2008 I maxed out in financial support for him, and this year I have already given 1K
Now....how do you match up to this thirty year record?
.....or do you want to change your screen name to newbie and/or slink away from this conversation in shame?
If you had been at this website long enough
and had read my comments throughout the over 4 years that I have been here, you'd already know that I have been in this game a lot before 1980. Search the archives, and you'll see my posts which say it. I don't have to make it up right now to try to prove a point.
And CLEARLY, and much more importantly, I have learned much more, since you exhibit the insight of a wet-behind-the-ears newbie that your member history suggests.
You may slink away now.
Do the search myself eh? Yeah
Do the search myself eh? Yeah right. Always knew you were a newbie.
bump to view
tonight
Gwinnett County Georgia
War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson
I have this video bookmarked
in my 9/11 file. It is I believe one of the most persuasive of the many that have been made to demonstrate that the official story is bunk and why people cannot accept that fact.
The testimony from recognised and experienced psychologists and psychiatrists amplifies all other testimony from experts in other disciplines. For anyone who is willing to sit through these interviews it becomes a transformational experience.
It may not give us all the answers to the question of what actually happened and who was behind it but it does tell us that our governments are lying to us and that is the starting point for an awakening.
As we progress along this line is becomes clear that they have been lying to us for a very long time and that virtually everything we think we know about our history and our national identities is a complete fabrication. Here is a series of videos from G. Edward Griffin's 1982 interview with Norman Dodd the chief investigator of the Reece Committee charged with the duty to ferret out the anti-American activities of non-profit, tax-exempt foundations in 1954.
These are the kinds of interviews that are authoritative without any technological whizz-bangs (not that there is anything wrong with those) and if one is willing to spend time listening to them they are absolutely fascinating. Watch and listen to this interview and you will never see the world the same way again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZqZGEBkX1s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Dodd
"Where the Welfare State is on the march the Police State is not far behind."
Melchior Palyi Hungarian Economist