268 votes

Guess What? SC Primary Results in Question!

I received an e-mail from our meet-up which I'm editing but for to include this statement:

I have some significant information that I need to share with all of you regarding vote fraud in the SCGOP Primary. I have met with SCGOP Chairman already and am meeting again next Wednesday in Columbia. You will want to hear what I have discovered.

I've have uploaded the SCGOP Primary Vote Analysis to Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_wWkfsJPShUMWQxMTc2NzgtM2M...

and would like commentary any of you analytical gurus might like to add here or additional insights. This is very important to us in South Carolina! Thanks!

****Analyst Adds Update****

Hey guys. I just want you all to know that I have graphed in detail all of the counties in NH, SC and Fla that have the precinct information available on the Election Commissions' website. I have amassed a couple of hundred graphs probably. The most difficult part of this is getting this information into a form that is brief but easy to understand. Please appreciate this.

There are surely exceptions to the following observations, but here are some generalities:

1. In any county where Ron Paul has more votes than Mitt Romney using the low vote total precincts, you get a ridiculous- looking curve like the one in Anderson County. (Anderson, Greenville, Spartanburg, and Oconee Counties). Mitt ends up at a vote total that could have been Paul's projected total and Paul crashes to the ground.

2. In the counties where Romney has more votes than Paul in the low vote total precincts, There is no ridiculous anomaly like the one in Anderson County.

3. In any race where Newt is ahead of Romney and Romney is anywhere close to Gingrich in vote total, Newt gets flipped by Romney (Richland, Charleston, and Beaufort Counties in SC) much like the maneuver in Anderson County where Mitt flips Paul. It appears to me that Newt actually won these counties as well as Polk and Duval Counties in Florida.

4. As I have laid out in my brief, fluctuations should occur in honest elections; however, these "flips" look to me like one candidate is suddenly losing his slope (established vote percentage) and another (Romney) is gaining at precisely the same percentage. My personal constitution screams to me "this phenomenon is not a normal occurrence!"

5. In almost all Counties, Mitt Romney gains hundreds- even more than a thousand- in the very largest precinct(s). Many instances this tail end gain appears to serve the purpose of draining Ron Paul just enough to be last place. (example: Charleston County SC). I'm not saying there isn't an honest explanation, but I want to hear one... that makes sense. Maybe in every single county Romney supporters turned out in "droves" at the very largest precinct(s)?

6. Most graphs follow a disturbing trend: Mitt Romney's vote percentage "line" looks more like a parabola curving upward and the other 3 candidates' lines like a parabola curving in the negative. This might could be explained in some honest way, but it looks like algorithms in voting machines to me. I invite intelligent discussion.

7. Yes- demographics can play a part, of course. I am NOT a Demographics expert. I do like math though.

8. I will release a procedure that will show all of you math analysts how to do this on your own. You will see the same anomalies as I see.

****Analyst Adds Greenville County Results****

The 2012 SC GOP Primary- Greenville
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_wWkfsJPShUOGRmYjdlN2YtZDY...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Felt like a punch in the gut, huh?

I know.

But at least we can live with ourselves - our consciences are clear.

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

bump

bumppppppy

I'll

give you a bump, until an analytical guru comes along... :)

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!

robot999's picture

The Campaign

MAY want to jump into this one - if convinced there is proof of fraud BECAUSE: Delegates are allocated based on Primary winners - right? (please correct me if I'm wrong here - I know different States operate under differing rules.)

"Government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex". - Frank Zappa

On the issue of fraud

I find that most people find it impossible to believe their honorable elected officials and others would knowingly tamper with the votes on a large scale. They will believe it in a historical context without question. If you tell someone about the Chicago and New York political bosses100-150 years ago forcing people to vote or not vote, they will beleive that, but they will be unable to point to when exactly that stopped, and why. The reason for that is that it hasn't. It changed forms and got a high-tech makeover, but election fraud is alive and well. You only need to think of those who would lose out if Ron Paul won. MIC contractors, global financiers, corrupt politicians, some pretty big players...

It reminds me of that scene from "No Country for Old Men" when the main character is being pursued by a gang, and he is making her get her stuff together so they can leave town. She asks him for how long, and he replies, "At which point would you stop looking for your two million dollars?"
There is a lot of money on the line for the establishment, and a little election fraud is small potatoes for them. Funny how it always is harmful to RP's vote totals, and almost always helpful to Mitt's...

Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito

Mathematical Proof?

BUMP!

bump

.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know Peace." - Jimi Hendrix