1 vote

Unprovoked Attack on Iran by Israel and US Imminent?

Unprovoked Attack on Iran by Israel and US Imminent?:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU2H8NjJwwg




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"unprovoked" is kind of a misnomer. Iraq did not provoke us.

Afghanistan did not provoke us.

Bosnia, nor Pakistan, nor Haiti, no Panama, nor Lebanon, nor Vietnam, nor Laos, nor Cambodia, nor Libya, neither Somalia, any more I forgot in recent times?

The U.S. no longer needs to be attacked to justify killing and maiming innocent civilians. All we need now is to "be afraid" of tuhrrists.

BOO!

I nuke you.

That is our current operational policy.

I am confused here, how is

I am confused here, how is the word "unprovoked" not appropriate? Iran hasnt provoked us so I would say that an attack on them would be an unprovoked attack.

Sorry, it is the correct term, what I forgot to say was that

certainly hasn't stopped us before. It is never a concern or requirement to be attacked first. At least not since December 7, 1941. (and technically that one could have been avoided)

"close to imminent" but...

...not quite. Madonna (kabala/Zionist) is scheduled for a concert in ISRAEL in late March. As soon as that is over and she is safely out of the region, then... bombs away.