Ron Paul Votes Stolen by Voting Machines (must see:)

Do all of the nay sayers think that all of the machines from the 2000 election have been replaced? Were the people responsible for the hacking prosecuted? Or was it all forgotten about and it is time for the election using the same technology? I don't know the answers, does anybody? Saying that situation happened a long time ago does not mean it was ever corrected. Our vote means nothing on corrupt voting machines. We need a paper receipt to show who we voted for and that technology has long been available. Any guesses why the government does not insist that all machines must provide a receipt? (they don't want you to know who really won)

The posted video talks about an anomaly that happened during the 2000 presidential elections in Florida.

Last time I checked, Ron Paul was not a candidate for president in 2000.

Ron Paul got -16,022 votes in florida? interesting video.

yeah, I thought the 2000 was an error... actually the error is that it was Gore who got the negative 16,022 votes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volusia_error

I don't agree that paper ballots are inherently more fraud proof, they can be cheated and gamed just the same. I think I saw a video on what I consider a better alternative, it kind of gives a mix of the quick efficiency of computerized ballots with the recheck personability of paper ballots. It gives all ballots a number that gets torn off the original ballot where you can than go back and look at a database that would list all numbers who voted for a paticular candidate and you can verify your number on your paper vs the vote recorded in a database. It makes it almost impossible to cheat that way as if they did you would have either tons of people with one of the ballots and nothing showing up on the websites with the results if they tried to exclude them or a bunch of people claiming it recorded the wrong vote if they tried to change the votes to someone else. And if you could see the whole list of everyones number under a candidate anyone with time could count them up and verify who the winner was. The extra cost would be in the keeping of an online database that anyone could verify there vote. It should be up till at least the final vote was verified. I hope that all made since.

they have been attacking the caucus process, because vote manipulation can easily be done through programming say every third vote for a candidate is electronically put on a chosen candidate for victory. All this without raising questions to election rigging because it happens instantly, they really want to get rid of the caucus process before the people wake up to their trickery. Hilarious how people believe it when MSM says the caucus process is obsolete, when it just is not easily manipulated.

http://www.dailypaul.com/214120/the-end-vote-election-fraud-...

With an electronic machine to record your vote, then is no evidence of how you vote. All the program has to do is limit votes for any candidate to a percentage to determine the outcome, which is very easy to do.

Prove your vote by using paper ballots only. These can be counted and recounted as needed.