-116 votes

Ron Paul supporters must now support Libertarian Party Presidential candidates

After last night's defeat in the "Super Tuesday" contest, it is time Ron Paul and his supporters put their influence with the Libertarian Party. Ron Paul picked up a miniscule number of delegates and has lost each state primary. The writing is on the wall, "The Republican Party is not a principled party and will have Mitt Romney as their nominee for President of the United States."

Sadly Ron Paul will not be the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States in 2012 and the sooner supporters move their support to the Libertarian Party, the better it will be for the country as a whole. Bringing their passion and skills to support the Libertarian Party's nominee will be crucial for a true three way race for President come this November.

Continue reading

http://www.examiner.com/libertarian-in-west-palm-beach/ron-p...




Like this article? Get DP delivered to your inbox daily. Subscribe here:

E-mail address:  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

There is no reason why Paul

There is no reason why Paul couldn't get the nomination of more than one party, though he'd have to be listed on the ballot as one or the other (or independent). In fact, I think multiple endorsements are the way to go.

Good point!

In fact the VAST MAJORITY of Ron Paul supporters are NOT libertarian!

The numbers speak for themselves. Bob Barr got less than 2% of the voting population.

Ron Paul pulls 8%-40+%

We are going to the Convention

I'm sure Johnson will get a lot of support if Paul isn't on the ballot in November. But don't expect that until after August, and then there is still the Americans Elect ballot line which Paul is way ahead in.

If that is the case, or if Paul's supporters actually launch a 50-state write in campaign, his supporters will be still with him.

Don't worry, if Paul is not on the ballot, you'll be getting the majority of his supporters (as long as you don't pick another Barr).

I will support Dr. Paul no

I will support Dr. Paul no matter where he goes. When he says he is done I'm going back to the Libertarian Party and I'm not looking back.

I'm not a boomer,I'm a 32

I'm not a boomer,I'm a 32 year old man and have been a member of the LP since 07'. I resent all of this collective anymosity toward all of us just because of some of our members. As for us doing nothing, in the state of Maine we need 10,000 signatures from unregistered voters. Do you know how difficult that is to accomplish? Don't talk shit about all of us like we're all egoists and whatever else a few of you are claiming us to be. Some of us DO try and work very hard.

Thank you

I just got back from the CA LP convention. I'll be a delegate to the LP convention in May.

It's our job to get as many freedom loving candidates into every office from water boards to congress as we can.

The dominant parties do everything they can to prevent voters from having our candidates on the ballot. Getting signatures to get on ballots is a huge task.

All these times when a Ron Paul type candidate is shut out at any level, at least the LP can make sure there is an alternative to the status quo. Voters are waking up.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

I am registered with American's Elect

Ron Paul is the favorite now with more votes than any other candidate.

American's Elect is on all 50 ballots and the selected candidate will be in the debates.

Whom ever is chosen as a candidate, the only requirement is for them to choose a VP from a different party. In RP's case he would need to choose a Dem or Independent.

This will be the direction I am going in if our man doesn't win at a brokered convention! :)

www.americanselect.org

people seriously can't imagine someone from this 20million+

movement, set to grow yet again in 2012 as millennial voting bloc increases yet again, to take up the baton? not a single one? this is like trying to tell bill gates to fit the new microsoft back to the old struggling apple company in midst of microsoft stock skyrocketing, just because apple had some partial relation with the original source code. im not even gonna honor the idea by talking about it. well i guess i already am, twice. allow me to go puke

Says who?

The Libertarian Party who would allow Bob Barr to run on their ticket in '08 has lost its way. I am an American, a small (l) libertarian, and no longer a part of the Libertarian Party. End of story.

I flirted with the Libertarian party a bit

when I realized that I don't fit in with the "Republicans". What I found was a bunch of closed-minded egoists who only accept you if you adopt their view of libertarianism. That's when I realized that parties in general just aren't for me. Seems like the Libertarian party is mostly made up of (from what I encountered at least) angry former Republicans/Democrats anyway who still lean towards their original party when push comes to shove. I'm sure there are good people in the Libertarian party but overall I don't have a lot of interest in supporting it.

attacked

There are several times I was attacked for my views by libertarians and I really felt that these people were elitist in their dogma. Anyone who doesn't live and believe their world view is just bad. I would love to speak with a libertarian who wasn't like that, then I could learn about the party without being attacked.

Blue Republican

Like when that idiot Reason

Like when that idiot Reason Magazine girl mocked Ron Paul on MSM and said that he is un-electable. I don't care if she is for Gary Johnston or not . . . Ron Paul is what gave Reason Magazine any sort of credibility in the first place.

If Paul took over the LP,

If Paul took over the LP, which seems to be his for the asking, it would be a transformed party. Right now, it is a very small closed group.

And all the 'obstacles' that are so daunting for Third Parties--

--Would also be easily overcome by a Ron Paul Libertarian candidacy.

He would poll well--he would be in the debates. He could win.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

You voted Bob Barr in...

You can't be trusted with the nations future. Sorry, you've been douched by the neocons.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

fuk you LP old farts

remnants of the boomers, almost just as bad as both major parties

we tripled our movement from 08. what has LP done during this period? we now owe sht to people who sat on their hands? where would our movement be in 12 as millennial voting bloc gets bigger and bigger? where would LP, a variant of the boomer ego display, endless abortion-demagoguery be? you can keep the feminist vote. we'll see where we each end up.

The question is not whether

The question is not whether we "owe" the LP anything. The question is how to get on the ballot more easily and more completely. The LP offers a good infrastructure to do that at this late. Besides, if RP and his backers entered the party, it would become completely transformed.

the question is the leadership quality in LP don't deserve

my energy.

ya, i know, mentioning bob barr would be too much of a cheap shot now. small violins.

I don't care about the party.

I don't care about the party. I care about the candidate. If the LP runs a worthy candidate, I don't care about the past.

Nice

Nice

Follow me on Twitter for breaking news from a libertarian perspective

www.twitter.com/AbolishTheFed

Not saying every boomer possesses the boomer ego

LP certainly does. people who even bother to proclaim themselves LP and pay loyalty to the label--just imagine what those kind of people could be, getting off on being a singularity. paul movement is here for the kind of people it has, not a plastic label like LP. the fact we even rallied around a principled 70 year old while LP endlessly railed against his age and look is obvious enough to speak for the difference. personality wise, paul movement and LP are oil and water.

I thought so.

.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Btw, does anyone know how the

Btw, does anyone know how the Libertarian nomination process works and where we stand? The MSM hasn't filled me in on that despite their 24 hour news cycle.

"Where liberty is, there is my country." -Benjamin Franklin

The LP nominates by national convention just like the others.

This year it will be in Vegas in early May.

As far as I know, all LP delegates are officially not pledged.

State affiliates have autonomy in their selection process.

Four states have primaries, likely dictated by state law. (since the LP doesn't like spending public funds on party elections) One has already been held. (James Oogle beat "uncommitted" - no one else on the ballot) Two others will definitely be held AFTER the LNC convention (way to go you dumbass state legislators) and I don't have a date on California, but that one will likely be after the LNC as well.

Check the Green Papers for which states, I don't have them handy.

Unfortunately, there is no state-by-state breakdown like there is for the Dems and Reps.

We have a procedure here in Louisiana formally in our By-laws, but we've never used it because not enough are ever interested in attending. We've always just tried to find people willing to go - first come, first served. (it costs about $1000-$2000 or more with travel and lodging)

I'd say if you want to be a delegate, show up to your state convention. Get involved. You'll probably get to go.

The various states do hold conventions, most of which are prior to the LNC, but not all. Candidates try to make appearances here and there are a few debates held at some, but overall, the real nomination contest is at the LNC, not before hand. A candidate can declare during the convention if they want and try to win over the delegates. They could do so as late as the actual nominations before balloting begins, but they'd be better served by doing so before the debate the previous night. It is usually broadcast on CSPAN as is the entire convention.

I will when/if the time

I will when/if the time comes, but not yet. Also, if you nominate an idiot like Barr then you can forget it. I'll go Constitution Party over Barr. Need GJ, RJ, RP, or someone similar.

"Where liberty is, there is my country." -Benjamin Franklin

I think it's ironic when "Libertarians" tell us what we MUST do.

LOL

So much for "big-L" Libertarianism.

lol

that's exactly what I was thinking.

it's funny because Bobby was one of the more active activists from FL, but now, he's just a downer. doesn't do anything other than perpetually post every single negative deadline short of kirchick crap.

sorry, Bobby, think a bit of break is in order. Divorce us. It'll be better for your health, instead of getting stressed over, or not, or having to deal with us.

poor you bobby.

Yeah, like I'm gonna vote for the party that nominated Fmr. CIA Bob Barr who endorsed Nut Grinch? Don't think so.

GOP sucks, but most of us here aren't in it for GOP. I for one am here for the Liberty/Freedom/Patriot Movement that the Doc has been de facto head, for over 40yrs.

if you think getting 20% of the public simply to deny Romney or oBUSHma, you're out of your mind.

We're not just here to win, without RP winning the POTUS, it's all moot anyway. So in the mean time, GOP infrastructure still affords us the best option. Plus ALL of Dr.Paul's campaign team has poured their blood sweat, money and tears on training people on the GOP delegate process for over 4yrs.

I know a source told Lew recently that if the Doc wanted Libertarian ticket, they'll hand it over to him on a silver platter, but the window in closing fast. At the same time, KNOWING that we'll more than likely control the delegate process, why would we?

Will vote libertarians, but not about to 'join' the party that Murray Rothbard help found, but also later left it, in disgust. Besides, the ONLY reason why one would join LP would be if they were infinitely more PURE and Principled than Dem or GOP. Sadly they're not.

They picked Barr over Mary. Not having it.

Bobby, I hope you find whatever it is that initially inspired you in the first place. It's too bad, but if you must, leave be. I'll respect your decision. It's not like we're unaware of the odds, but really, RP is not gonna go third party. That window has long passed. BUT, in the small chance that he does, my vote will follow. I'll write him in, just as I did in 2008, and will do so happily, knowing that unless the mooks and sheeple in this country wake up, the Fed Gvt will bankrupt itself out of existence anyway.

So be it. There's only so much we CAN do to wake up people. Besides, these ideas, most have to wake up on their own with time dedicated into actually researching. Now, of course most won't do it, and we're running out of time.

But people's refusal to wake up is something that we have very little control over. We'll exhaust the current efforts via GOP, till the Doc says no more. And, as much as I like Rand, I for one could care less about what happens to his 'political career' if the Doc bolts GOP. By then, that act itself will signal the final nail in the coffin of the GOP anyway. They destroyed themselves with the way they treated the Doc. And IF Doc bolts, chances are Rand will follow. If not so be it. I'll still support Rand, regardless.

In the end, the entire system needs a reboot.

It's never been about party politics.

It's always been about stopping an aberrant group of sociopathic lunatics who have long hijacked the Republic.

All of this is up for grabs, we have a completely imbecilic and schizo society who can barely distinguish rights vs. privilege, yet even now, the Constitutional vein runs deep in America. So unless the nation can be turned around to agreeing on the Constitution, unless we can even get to that bare minimum in progress, even I as an AnCap do not expect a democratic society, let alone a more voluntaryst one.

The Doc is the Republic's last hurrah. Come currency collapse and Iran War, they'll all be forced to assess. By then we'll have fully sorted out who the good and bad guys are. Can't say we didn't warn them though, eh?

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

That dog won't hunt

3rd parties are DOA in this country. The 2 party system is engineered to assure it. I tried my hand at Libertarian politics 20 years ago. Lots of infighting on how libertarian are you. No real traction with the disinterested public at large. The media controls elections, Ron Paul's showing proves it. No 3rd party is going to get enough coverage to make a dent.

I don't agree. This time out

I don't agree. This time out Paul has proven to be a major force. The media will have a vested interested in promoting him as a third party because they have the mistaken view that it will "help" Obama win.

But Ron Paul is a Republican...

...and has been for over 40 years except for a 6 month stint in 1988.

People tend to forget that fact.

Further the VAST MAJORITY of RPs support is Republican.

LP gets less than 2% of the vote each cycle. RP pulls 8%-40+%.