238 votes

DP Peer Review: Evidence of Algorithm Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections Layman's Executive Summary




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Maybe It's a Good Time To Revisit These Documents.

GOP fraud in Florida is getting big headlines. Romney's campaign is self-destructing more every day. Even Republicans don't want to vote for him. This information, along with all the evidence of voter suppression, last minute rule changes, intimidation tactics (breaking of bones), all kinds of other activities that tow the line of illegal. Should Romney even be eligible to be the nominee? And if not, who is the real nominee? I think we all know the answer.

Update?

I'd love to know if this is going to be used in the lawsuits. This seems to be a very important piece of evidence.

this needs to go viral and Ben Swann needs to air it.

thanks.

I posted on Ben Swann the link

to the documents with the algorithmic charts and interpretation. Fascinating stuff.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByJAC-sfXwumZzI2bVlON2VTMnFy...

Yes, guys, this is by far the

Yes, guys, this is by far the most conclusive and well-documented evidence of vote flipping. PLEASE tweet, share, and whatever else you can do to get this out there. THIS is the key piece to exposing the GOPestab.

Freedom in our lifetime! - fiol.us

Did anything ever come of this?

I thought it was going to Ben Swann a while back, and it's been over a month... anyone know if anything came of this, or if there has been any additional analysis of later votes as well?

JFk Speech on the dangers of secret societies

Adding to this thread for continuity:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42Ggb3fzJTw

The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. - Heinlein

Programmer Testifies to Creating Vote Flipping Software

Adding this to the thread for continuity:

http://www.dailypaul.com/221279/programmer-testifies-to-crea...

The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. - Heinlein

Wrong.

The event is a failure to asymptote. I would like to count how many primaries or caucuses it happened in in 2008 and 2012. one can get a sense if this is a random event or whether a change in counting process occurred-- one that selectively hit Romney and Paul

This is crazy stuff

in that your able to detect it. Any programmer with a brain could write a short program place it on those card, voting machine up loads it and executes the program. When all done voter machine just erases all evidence writes over it with data to be transferred.

This short program could do all kinds of comparisons and calculations to be virtually undetectable. How do I know this? I actually worked with computers and programming many years ago. Programming has changed to a higher level since then, but the algorithms are basically the same.

What I am getting at this programmer doesn't like what he is being asked to do, and he is purposely leaving tracks.

If you could figure out who it is you just my get a confession, anonymously of course.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

You are right. Someone wants

You are right. Someone wants it to be detected.
As you may recall the AP has announced results in Nevada and Maine 2 days early, and then recently announced Romney winner in the VI as if it was a preplanned story that wasn't corrected.
Someone is dropping bread crumbs, crouton sized.

RON PAUL 2012 * Restore America * Bring The Troops Home
http://www.texasuncensored.blogspot.com

I used to write programs

for myself using a lot of machine language. That was a long time ago, but I am positive I could have wrote a small program undetectable by any one, before or after. I have never seen a voter machine but it being a computer, makes it very vulnerable to hackers from within. I would bet any thing when the voter machine is first turned on it checks to see what is on the card. If a certain flag is set, it know there is executable code on it. When code is loaded the machine reformats or erases the card and all tracks.

If the graphs I seen were real, the programmer was an idiot or was deliberately leaving tracks. Because with a few more lines of code there would be no slope in the graphs. But it is possible they didn't look at previous years voting in a graph.

Another way is by putting a negative number on the card in Paul's count and a positive number in Romney's count. The machine is programmed to add these numbers up a spit them out as a test. As long as the equal zero everything passes. There is a clip on you tube that shows how this is done, so I don't think they would try it again. You could find it by going to blackboxvoting.org

One way to end all voting machine corruption is by assigning no names only numbers or characters. The names can be randomly added at the last minute just before voting starts.

One thing is for sure control of these voting machine need to be taken out of the hands of the corporation and given to the people. After all they paid for them with their taxes.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

you cant hide the truth totaly ever..

+ they are ignorant and think they come through with everything.
Sometimes you have whsitleblowers that dont state something public, to avoid harrasment, but build in little hints.

I call what you're describing as:

"poking us with a stick".

Freedom is not: doing everything you want to.
Freedom is: not having to do what you don't want to do.
~ Joyce Meyer

POKE, POKE

There is a lot of negative news about caucus states lately, I think it is intentional. If they can get them all over to voter machines they got more control and no one sees. I think the GOP has been cheating on purpose and wants to be caught, to force voter machines.

After all, all they would have to do to end all controversy over these caucus votes is to install a cheap computer on the phone line to record every call that comes in. In that way every caucus vote could be verified in seconds by an auditor/judge. Nothing is hidden, but it is obvious to me they want it that way. I believe they had screw ups at every caucus this year, no accident.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

this

needs to be permanently bumped! we need continual coverage and action on this evidence. If America woke up to this we would have an immediate revolution. In the least we must wake up all of the RP supporters, to show them that we are indeed stronger, and that we are winning despite their theft. It is an info war and we need to do a lot better.

Fantastic work, statheads

I'm a numbers guy but not like you guys. That's some hardcore math. Great work.

I sent this to Ben Swann a few days ago

and after looking at the google graph docs I sent him, he wants to talk to all parties concerned. Ideally the originator and now maybe you detractors can try to sell your case as well. email him at bswann@fox19.com

I included as well the Polling Votes vs Delegates Therory as well and if that author is reading this he should contact Ben as well.

He can get it out there if there's something to it.

Now it's about the Constitution and the fight to defend it.

I reproduced some of the graphs

I posted my graphs on the thread started by affa at ronpaulforums. I don't believe an "algorithm" is controlling everything, but I do believe there is fraud in the elections. Again and again, Romney does better in larger precincts than smaller ones. In some cases, we are talking about precincts with 100 votes counted versus 20 votes counted. Romney will almost always do better on average in the 100 vote precincts than the 20 vote ones. I don't think demographics explain this, but you don't need an alogrithm to explain it either. All you need is for votes to be flipped sporadically, with higher frequency of flipping in larger precincts. This type of flipping can occur on tallying hand written votes as well as with electronic votes. There are plenty of motivated GOP insiders in all states who want to prop up Romney votes at the expense of Paul or other candidates.

Is there data coallated in a

Is there data coallated in a text file or excel spreadsheet you could post? it is very hard to get together the precinct data for all these states and I'm wanting to do some hardcore stats on this to help quantify how abnormal it is....

I only have virginia and south carolina data

The precinct data is publicly available, but I don't know if anyone has tried to collate it into a master file. You should try contacting "affa", "liberty1789", or "RonRules" over at ronpaulforums.com. Those guys have done a lot of work on this.

By the way, the last time I checked, they were asking for volunteers to look at Ohio data.

Thanks Matt! I'll check with

Thanks Matt! I'll check with those guys on the forum.

If you have virginia and SC, could you please send it to me?

I lack both of those still.

If there's an algorithm being applied there will be

If there's an algorithm being applied there will be a detectable pattern.

If there's a detectable pattern then it can be demonstrated using standard statistical methods, and expressed in standard statistical terminology.

If it's demonstrated using standard statistical methods and expressed in standard statistical terminology, then that will be the kind of evidence that could get the attention of someone like Nate Silver. It would also be the kind of evidence need in court.

This has been refuted at

This has been refuted at ronpaulforums.com

Here is the link:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?367223-The-Case-Against-Vote-Flipping-(no-fraud)

Summary: no fraud

The demographics that are driving turnout are also driving Newts fall as turnout rises.

This shows that demographics can explain not only Paul and Huntsman, but can also explain other candidates.

We believe there is no reason to expect they can't explain other states as well.

To prove fraud one must adjust for these demographics. A downwardly or upwardly sloped graph isn't proof (The initial vote flipper theory cited the downward slope as the primary evidence for fraud). Only if it contradicts the demographics is there a potential for fraud.

But that does not explain the

But that does not explain the mirror image aspect of these graphs when comparing Romney and Paul, does it? That is what struck me as very odd...

If my need to be RIGHT is greater than my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle

yes it does. Look at my

yes it does.

Look at my graphs for part 1 and 3. Mirror images of Paul and Romney.

All of the graphs in that post

stop at 50%. Right where the curves are supposed to flatten out. The whole point is that as more and more votes are counted, the graphs will converge on their respective final values. That should happen regardless of demographics.

If the data was randomly

If the data was randomly tallied then yes you are right.

Once you start sorting by vote count, etc. You can have slopes all the way.

That depends

on whether the x-axis is the cumulative percentage of votes (the right way to do it) or the cumulative percentage of precincts. The latter will give you meaningless lurches in the slope of the line, simply because something that's very non-linear is being arbitrarily mapped onto a linear scale.