Home » Forums » Politics, General + Law(s) » Ron Paul
3 votes

Deleted

Submitted by Tao Chi Fun on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:16
in

.


Like this article? Get DP delivered to your inbox daily. Subscribe here:

E-mail address:  

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The birthers are

Submitted by abby4 on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:51.

alive and well. lol They are now looking at Romney to vet for citizenship eligibility.

someone is either going to have to let obama go or vetting done for ALL candidates--the way it is supposed to be.

—

mickey45

and this comment relates... how?

Submitted by Tao Chi Fun on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 23:07.

.

—

πολλα γαρ πταιομεν απαντες ει τις εν λογω ου πταιει ουτος τελειος ανηρ δυνατος χαλιναγωγησαι και ολον το σωμα

So what

Submitted by abby4 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 10:36.

good are delegates if he is found ineligible?

—

mickey45

by my count

Submitted by Crabacado on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:50.

Delegate States for Ron Paul are
NV, Iowa, Wash, Maine, MO, prob NH, and VA. I'm hopeful for TX and CA delegates as well.

No worries

Submitted by ralph hornsby on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:31.

It also says plurality of delegates in a state. He won Virgin Islands, and has four states in the bag as far as delegates go.

Getting worried

Submitted by PeoplePower on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:26.

When the vote count, ballot fraud, and flipping doesn't work, they'll try this.

This was addressed yesterday

Submitted by just-a-girl on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:21.

This was addressed yesterday by the campaign. The Paul campaign expects to have atleast a plurality in 5 states.

Thank you

Submitted by oaebcr on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:28.

for clarifying - it's PLURALITY of delegates in five states. I hope we can do Maine, Washington, Alaska, North Dakota and Minnesota - I don;t know of any other states wher Paul has a REAL chance to get a plurality of delegates.

At least there is still hope.

I know the poster meant well, but it sure did scare me. I hope we can have epeats of stories like in MO in other states, but is Paul going to come away with the plurality in MO?

Anyway, I'm worried, vote this up and spread to other pro-sites and supporters that you may know.

optimystic's picture

Don't forget Iowa and Nevada

Submitted by optimystic on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:49.

I think he has a real good chance at having the plurality in Iowa and Nevada. Some folks also list Colorado. Montana may be a possibility, county delegates won't be selected until June.

Was it posted here at the DP?

Submitted by Tao Chi Fun on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:25.

Will delete if this is redundant.

—

πολλα γαρ πταιομεν απαντες ει τις εν λογω ου πταιει ουτος τελειος ανηρ δυνατος χαλιναγωγησαι και ολον το σωμα

It was posted yesterday

Submitted by Yukimura17 on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 19:44.

here: http://www.dailypaul.com/222237/gop-convention-rule

Although I don't mind seeing it again if the poster would somehow update the post to include the actual rule that states "plurality of delegates" not just popular votes that the rule referred too ^_^ and that the rule were supposedly a "temporary rule" as well...

Just a thought though ^^

—

"Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed."~Mahatma Gandhi
Quick Humorous Satire course on Ron Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_65316&...

No update necessary.

Submitted by Tao Chi Fun on Thu, 03/22/2012 - 23:04.

There is a link to the GOP rules provided in the article, it's even highlighted. If someone lacks the ability to either click a link or scroll through a PDF, then I'm afraid there is really not much more we can do to help them.

—

πολλα γαρ πταιομεν απαντες ει τις εν λογω ου πταιει ουτος τελειος ανηρ δυνατος χαλιναγωγησαι και ολον το σωμα