The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
43 votes

Rothschild's Appear to Hold Shares in Every Major Company (Fortune 500)

4 shareholders own the most stock in almost every Fortune 500 company or any major company. These are just a few of the hundreds of companies.

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

McDonald’s Corp:

FMR LLC (Fidelity)
Capital World Investors
BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.
Capital Research Global Investors

Sherwin-Williams Company (The) (This is a paint company)

FMR LLC (Fidelity)

I looked into two of the companies that and their managers either were former Rothschild employees or the companies received money from them. The Rothschild's are assumed to be the richest family in the world. They have been around for centuries and have played a major role in banking if not the largest around the world.

Quoting their own websites.
#1 Vanguard: John James, Vanguard Managing Director- “was a senior executive with Rothschild Australia Asset Management.”

"State Street Appointed By NM Rothschild & Sons to Provide Investment "
#2 State Street Corporation-

Most occurring Shareholder Companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity(FMR LLC)

This leads me to believe that those groups are Rothschild front groups.
These also hold have the same top 10 shareholders.
Alcoa Inc.
Altria Group Inc.
American International Group Inc.
AT&T Inc.
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Coca-Cola Co.
DuPont & Co.
Exxon Mobil Corp.
General Electric Co.
General Motors Corporation
Hewlett-Packard Co.
Home Depot Inc.
Honeywell International Inc.
Intel Corp.
I came across this after my research.

Thoughts about any of this?

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Joη's picture

what about the Rothschild's appear?

I didn't know their appear was so significant. Is it from a particular pier they peer to partake in their peers?

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?

Bumping this ...

... because it is interesting and this thread was mentioned in another recent thread.

Yes, I've run across this phenomenon, too, as far as the top investors in all the largest corporations are the same companies, and specifically Fidelity, Black Rock, State Street, Vanguard, JP Morgan Chase, New York Bank Mellon, and a few others.

Not only that, but these companies are also the largest shareholders in each other, in most cases (largest shareholders of JP Morgan Chase, which itself is a large shareholder in other companies, are Vanguard, State Street, etc.).

However, keep in mind that these companies are also mutual funds, hedge funds, and "investment management" or "advisory" companies. So, if 10,000 people each have $100,000 in retirement funds with Fidelity, then Fidelity investment managers will need to invest that $1 billion under management. So, it stands to reason that they will invest in some of the larger companies.

JP Morgan Chase has a bank, a trust department, and also does "investment services." It is the largest in the world, managing $2 TRILLION in assets.

Bank of America also manages $2 TRILLION. Citigroup is nearly $2 TRILLION, with Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs near $1 TRILLION each.

Between those 5 companies, they control a total of $8 TRILLION in assets.

The total value of ALL the publicly owned companies in the WORLD is about $50 trillion.

So, these 5 companies could buy up almost 20% of every publicly-owned company in the world. But they don't do that, of course. They would diversify investments and only a portion would be put into stocks.

However, they don't have to buy up all of the stock anyway.

Let's say the world's stock market valuation is $50 trillion, and these 5 companies have $10 trillion to work with.

They could buy 51% of every publicly-owned company on the planet and it would cost $25.5 trillion. They have $10 trillion, so they would have to borrow $15.5 trillion. Who would they borrow from? Duh. They are BANKS! They would borrow from each other. And how would they do that? Double Duh. They are FEDERAL RESERVE banks or connected to them. They would be able to PRINT that money, one way or the other.

Keep in mind, they do NOT want to buy (or better yet, control) EVERY company out there. Probably more like 1,000 or so is all, and probably only a few dozen are really important -- those that build infrastructure (government waste is a HUGELY profitable scam ... er business), defense companies (military industrial complex), oil companies, etc.

And it's not even "their" money. It is your money, my money, your neighbor's money, etc. People put their money into banks, retirement, funds, mutual funds, trusts, etc. for various financial reasons.

By CONTROLLING THE MONEY, they can control the big corporations, and through that, the politicians.

Regardless if it is specifically the Rothchilds, the Rockefellers, various CFR members, or anyone else, the important thing to figure out is that it is this CONTROL OF EVERYONE'S MONEY that is the KEY to their power.

And don't forget, large companies (defense contractors, media companies, infrastructure companies, etc.) also need to BORROW money from time to time, and THIS is another tool used to gain control. Loans can be written in such a way that the banker gains the right to put one of their guys on the Board of Directors, for example. Inside information! Plus, the ability to call a loan due gives the banker massive power over the company.

The Federal Reserve is the primary tool that backstops everything else, but it is controlling Average Joe's money that REALLY gives them the power.

It is through using YOUR money through banking, financial services, retirement planning services, investment advisory services, insurance services (Warren Buffett's big tool), bank lending, and then the Federal Reserve to do the heavy lifting when necessary, that a relatively small group of people can control MOST of big business, big media, and the politicians.

And then with that money, they also fund the government's universities, making sure "their" agenda is promoted in academia.

By offering deals, they buy the politicians, too. Newt Gingrich set up a "consulting" company after he got booted out of Congress and made millions through that company. Karl Rove has his own "consulting" company, that gets paid by the GOP.

Acorn and other "non-profit" companies get grants from government, which are used to promote politicians, who give more grants to the NGO's.

Big Business gets contracts with the government, which lines the pockets of the directors and others who are connected, including politicians who sit on those boards when they are not in office or running for office (Romney is back on the board of Marriott, Herman Cain sits on several boards -- and he's as dumb as they come).

This is how they use the capital of the masses to their advantage. They funnel it into banks, investment companies, political campaign contributions, charitable organizations, that are all POLITICALLY-CONNECTED.

Business is great. Charity is great. Investment is great. Some investment advisers are great (most are worthless tools, just parroting the "mainstream wisdom," but some are very good).

But there are SOME people who gain advantages by setting up a system (or participating in that system after it was set up by others) that funnels money FROM the masses TO THEM.

This is what taxation is REALLY all about. This is what central banking is REALLY all about. This is what Big Business is REALLY all about. This is what Big Charity is REALLY all about. This is why Big Media and Big Education REALLY exist -- to support the narrative that these other institutions are "honorable" and that anything or anyone who is contrary to or even talks in a contrary manner is somehow ... a "conspiracy nut."

Probably the only way to defeat it are to: (a) educate a lot of people as to what is going on, and (b) start to structure alternatives and using the alternative services instead of the rigged system. Imagine if 20% of the people who currently funnel their money into the corrupt system were to stop sending money to them and instead send their money to a free market alternative -- and did so because they understood what the reality was (meaning, they also recognized mainstream media and education as propaganda)!

They own the money supply

Own it. They create it out of nothing and lend it at interest. Individuals get paid from your income taxes--directly. It's really hard to wrap you head around the fact that they own the money, not they saved up a bunch of money or they earned a bunch of money, they create it, they own it, they control it. I think people think money is some natural thing that just exists and families like the Rothchilds are just really tied-in with it and have a bunch of it, when the reality is, the Rothchilds invented modern money and own it outright. When you pay taxes, you pay them. When you pay for a hotdog, you pay them. You know that dollar in your front pocket, it is owed back to them. If all debts were paid, there would be no money because every red cent has been created and loaned by them.

That really does

sum it up.


if we end the federal reserve does there empire collapse too?

Albert Camus — 'The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.'

More the reverse

We expose the Rothschilds, and the Federal Reserve collapses. All the Central Banks. Then we declare a Jubilee. Or call it a Mulligan, I don't care, just so much could be undone in an instant... The instant we all chose to forgive each other...
Thank you for digging up this old gem. We need to see more posts with the NAMES of the oppressor right there in the title.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

well i agree

but what about people who are uniformed of how the fed works? we need to educate them about it first and foremost then we can name names :)

Albert Camus — 'The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.'

Ah, just smack 'em upside the head.

Oh, that doesn't work either... dammit, it is a lot more satisfying than talking to the brick walls... lol!
A one-two punch is needed, for sure.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.


smack em upside the head LOL no no thats not how we educate others we introduce them to fractional reserve lending federal reserve system and how ron paul taught us to get out of the federal reserve power and how we can take back the power and put it in the hands of the people.

Albert Camus — 'The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.'

If you insist.

But my way is a better stress reliever.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Anyone running across this old post

might find this website rather interesting.

More info on the Rothschild Empire...

I'll let you all read over all this & make of your own mind...

Forbidden History: Timeline of the ‘New World Order’:

The History of the House of Rothschild:

Forbidden Knowledge - History of the Khazar Empire - Lecture by Jack Otto:

They Dare Not Speak its name . . . Rothschild Zionism:

The Zionist Elephant In The Room:

So Have fun learing about "The Dark Cabal" and their Old World Order

"Great Men Do Not Seek Power, They Have Great Power Thrust Upon Them"


its the old world order we are creating the New world order not from their point of view but ours peace freedom liberty sound money Alternative media out with the old in with the new bye bye mainstream media hello INTERNET.

Albert Camus — 'The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.'

Interlocking directorates...

...that's what makes the (crony capitalist) world go round.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

few speak of the rothschilds

You will never hear of their name in the media, as they hate leaving too many crumbs behind for us to follow, if it does, it's quick and dismissed, no one speaks of their name, those who opposed them are killed off. But with the wealth that they've accumulated through the misery and suffering of humanity, it will be returned one day, and its just unfathomable that they run this world, I say it's going be game over for them very soon
empires in every form take looong time to build, but it only takes less than half the time for it to crumble.

"Give me control of a nation's money supply,

"Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws". ~ Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Some history on how Rothscild's took over the banks...

Those silly people think Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are the richest men in the world !??

I've read several times the Rothchilds Family is worth between

500 and 600 trillion. The net worth of the United States is just around 60 trillion. If true, who owns who?

Yea it's scary if they're

Yea it's scary if they're worth that much, make me feel sick to even thinking about it. I've heard that the directly and indirectly own more than half the worlds wealth.

Jesus has a final reckoning with the money changers.

As promised in all the prophetic books. You can't have a situation where a one-world currency, government, and religion exist without locking down control.

In your list above, I count five of the top ten defense contractors.

Money changers are the only group He got violent with. If the love of money is the root of all evil, we are definitely headed into some seriously epic times.

Yes, yes, yes!!

Looking forward to that. Let's also our reckoning with President Paul!!

dont mean to get all religious but

THe only time as I can tell Jesus displayed violence and anger was against the money changers, the USURERS. Also Jesus in the bible depicted our solution. When offered control over everything, much the same they feel when they get a position at goldman sax or as a ceo in a roth corp, Jesus did not get angry or fight or threaten instead he disengaged turned his back. The same soluton, Enlightened disengagement, if you are paying slave taxes, if your pocket is full of slave money, if you beg for permission to do what free men know they do not need permission to do such as move about this earth, perhapes your not disengaged.


I love that term

Enlightened Disengagement. Sums up everything I believe.

Libertarian the art of war

Enlightened disengagement.


A Rothschild was assassinated in the 1970s...

when economic conditions were similar. If economic conditions get worse...who knows? Someone might finish the job.

So do I. For that matter so

So do I. For that matter so do most pension funds. So what?

Insofar as the Rothschild banking empire...

holding possession of these companies is concerned, it is highly probable and for sure as the Foundations of this country holding the vast majority of American Coprprate stock. Ownership of the govenrnment was affected via the establishment of the Foundations and their abiltiy to grow tax free and inetract as needed with the Rothschild controlled central banks.

It was all laid out for us in 1953 by the Reese Committee...before they were gagged by powers onm both sides of the isle...powers put in place by the theory...just fact. See the report on SCRIBD.

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

the Rothchild's are small potatoes compared to the

wal-mart family.

please before you coment as if your an expert do just a little

RESEARCH. Please just google NWO Rothschild and do a little reading then come back and coment. Your so lost the Wallmart family are such small potatoes and are only allowed to exist by the Rothschild crime bank gangster mafia. Its important to know a little real history. Wallmart has no history it a shill flyby night sell china crap destroy america corporation only one of many many.


From my research there are a lot of rothchilds

spanning many generations in many different countries in the past they may have held some significant office such as being head of some central bank or whatever and maybe some political seat but nothing that hints at world domination their collective wealth is definitely less than bill gate's maybe around a couple billion dollars if that and any one who says otherwise well I hate to say it but it seems to be conspiratorial nonsense but you can maybe provide some links or make a thread about it to prove me wrong.