The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular Liberty.com

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
43 votes

Rothschild's Appear to Hold Shares in Every Major Company (Fortune 500)

4 shareholders own the most stock in almost every Fortune 500 company or any major company. These are just a few of the hundreds of companies.

Monsanto: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=MON+Major+Holders
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (THE)
STATE STREET CORPORATION
PRICE (T.ROWE) ASSOCIATES INC
PRIMECAP MANAGEMENT COMPANY
JENNISON ASSOCIATES LLC
BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

McDonald’s Corp:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=MCD+Major+Holders

FMR LLC (Fidelity)
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (THE)
STATE STREET CORPORATION
Capital World Investors
BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.
Capital Research Global Investors

Sherwin-Williams Company (The) (This is a paint company)
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=SHW+Major+Holders

MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES CO - OTHER
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (THE)
FMR LLC (Fidelity)
STATE STREET CORPORATION
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY

I looked into two of the companies that and their managers either were former Rothschild employees or the companies received money from them. The Rothschild's are assumed to be the richest family in the world. They have been around for centuries and have played a major role in banking if not the largest around the world.

Quoting their own websites.
#1 Vanguard: John James, Vanguard Managing Director- “was a senior executive with Rothschild Australia Asset Management.”
http://www.vanguard.com.au/personal_investors/about-vanguard...

"State Street Appointed By NM Rothschild & Sons to Provide Investment "
#2 State Street Corporation- http://pr.statestreet.com/us/en/20070129_1.html

Most occurring Shareholder Companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity(FMR LLC)

This leads me to believe that those groups are Rothschild front groups.
These also hold have the same top 10 shareholders.
Alcoa Inc.
Altria Group Inc.
American International Group Inc.
AT&T Inc.
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Coca-Cola Co.
DuPont & Co.
Exxon Mobil Corp.
General Electric Co.
General Motors Corporation
Hewlett-Packard Co.
Home Depot Inc.
Honeywell International Inc.
Intel Corp.
etc...
I came across this after my research. http://www.realnews24.com/the-large-families-that-rule-the-w...

Thoughts about any of this?



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

There is about 250 i counted that are worth counting

Often they have changed their last names or married into other families. Evelyn Rothschild is one of the very top in the family buisness, bankgangster false debt slavery of humanity, USURY crimes against humanity. It just dont take to much to figure it all out and you dont have to throw out those MSM jig words like cornspiritualy. If you do not have the ability to use a search engine and read and you still need somone to prove somthing. FORGET YOU.

sovereign

Yes, the fact that I talked to the Rothschild Group myself in

NYC, and they confirmed they own ES&S, which tabulates 85% of our votes.

....seriously?

....seriously?

The investment banks made Sam Walton, they own Walmart.

Sam was just their trademark and someone to hide behind.

.

theirs alot of conspiracy guys here on the daily paul

I don't really believe in that stuff myself although I am a free market anarchist. maybe you guys could make a forum section dedicated to that. I am however sympathetic to the conspiracy theorist as Murray Rothbard said "all conspiracies are true."

So Welcome...

To the machine

bump

bump

donvino

Vanguard is an investment

Vanguard is an investment fund like a mutual fund right? As is Fidelity and the rest I believe.

Also a top financial executive having worked at a Rothschild investment bank is not that compelling.

There is no proof the Rothschild family owns any of this stuff. I do believe they have or had assets in the trillions but I have never seen it explained specifically (in mainstream press).

You are looking for something that isn't here.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

I'm sure it's even more pervasive than you suspect.

They literally own the world, and most of the big corporations that "seem to be autonomous" are just fronts for the Rothschilds. Especially banks and financial institutions.

The Fidelity example is interesting.
Their logo is the Illuminati pyramid with rays of light extending out from behind it.
Link
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia....

Pretty sure it's LESS than you suspect...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity_Investments

FMR LLC (Fidelity Management and Research) or Fidelity Investments is an American multinational financial services corporation. It is one of the largest mutual fund and financial services groups in the world.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

And your point is.....?

What? That because they have a web-site and make money managing money that they have...I dunno...no ownership?...No subterfuge?...No links to Rothschild Banks?

What?

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

Indeed

They probably have ties so deep that well never figure out and it doesn't surprise me that Fidelity is an Illuminati symbol. After I watched Money Masters I was ready to destroy them.

They don't call it The

They don't call it The Octopus for nuthin'.

There is no such thing as the

There is no such thing as the "Illuminati".

That symbolism is common, not rare at all.

It means nothing.

Where's the evidence?

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

The Illuminati was founded by

The Illuminati was founded by Spartacus Weishaupt [1], who led a slave revolt in the Gommorah province of the Roman empire, circa 68 BC. The revolt was focused on economic liberty and interior design. Today the Illuminati[2] secretly coordinates garbage pick up in most US states, as a front for their other activity.

[1] Dicks and Alazzi, 1986; p. 122.

[2] Ibid.

Yeah but all the central

Yeah but all the central banks were founded by the Rothchilds.

When we start using fiat money issued by 'the illuminati,' I'll start worrying about Weishaupt.

gold = money
war = health of the state
liberty = prosperity

To say that so ...

...matter-of-factly is stupid.

It's historical FACT that the Illuminati existed.

Whether it still does is another thing. You sure as fuck don't know for a fact so shut up.

Some people become so anti-conspiratorial that anything not taught in public school is suspect to them.

CONSPIRACIES HAPPEN ALL THE TIME.

Deal with it.

Work for pay, pay for freedom
Fuck 'em all, we don't need 'em

A good example of the

A good example of the problems with stuff taught in public school is how they teach the Bill of Rights. Back when I was in school if it was asked on a quiz or test where we get our rights from the correct answer would be the Bill of Rights.

But, actually, our rights do not come from the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights simply protects those rights from the government. It should be more accurately titled the Bill of Prohibitions because most of the first 10 amendments are prohibitions upon the government interfering with our rights.

Where do our rights come from? From our humanity. As the Declaration of Independence states, from "their Creator." "Creator" being however it is you believe you came into existence or simply your human existence itself.

But in public school? They lead kids to believe that government is the be all end all giver and taker of our Rights. It's simply not so.

...

Your rights couldn't possibly

Your rights couldn't possibly come from god unless you're Jewish.

What good is wealth if you cant own everything

Unlimited digitized money all of it as a debt to everyone else complete ownership hidden under layers of corporation and complete avoidance of any type of responsibility for what the corporation is directed to acomplish.

The false debt created at the Roth central bank is heaped upon the public as a control mechanism. Create a problem DEBT then provide the solution Tax. Tax the control yoke forcing cowardly immoral submission to theives.

Solution enlightened disengagement. Exit the matrix Neo.

sovereign

What good is unspent money?

What good is unspent money? All it does is sit in a bank and depreciate, or at worst do absolutely nothing.

The difference between rich people and poor people's thinking is rich people see cash as something with which to buy assets that increase cashflow. Poor people think cash as something one should save, or worse, spend on junk.

I don't keep more than a few thousand dollars in the bank at any given time, and even then it's just for petty-cash and day to day operating expenses. I'd be insane to keep my wealth in cash.

not about spent or unspent money

In fact its not about money at all. If you can digitize money into existance its not about money.

Its about using issuance of digitized out of thin air fiat money not as money at all but as a COMPOUNDING NATIONAL DEBT, its a false debt. Why is it important for these money creators to create a compounding false debt? When you can foist debt upon somone you then can justify any type of immoral conduct including torture and murder.

The False national debt is used to justify the TAX collection. Tax is theft. Collecton is extortion. SO tax being extorted theft would never be accepted by the population but when justified as if we have a National Debt now it becomes some patriotic citizen contract to pay.

The yoke of debt slavery foisted upon humanity based upon debt issue of ditital (no cost to create) sovereign monies. The creators are central bank and ultimatley you can match the money trails to the richest most evil criminals in humanity, the Rothschild family.

So I say again its not about how much money they use or leave lay around its about debt slavery.

sovereign

You just don t get it

What is so hard to understand? I typed a long explainaton and you ignored it and came out with stupid shit.

sovereign

What do you care? The rich

What do you care? The rich pay all the taxes, not you.

are you thick or just stupid

Its not about paing taxes I try hard to restrain my self and not call you stupid or a fool but your coments are stupid and foolish.

Ill try to explain but not for you for anyone else, your coment has discusted me.

Tax is a control vehicle its not about money collection, not one penny of collected income tax goes to pay for anyting for your dumb slave butt, every cent is collected to service the national debt.

The national debt is a false debt a debt that was made by proclaimation, digitized out of thin air, not a debt created by your government but a debt created by a central bank corporation. FALSE DEBT used to extort and theft. Again not because they have a need for money as you think. If they need money its digitized in unlimited quantities.

So why tax collection. They get dumb fools to cowardly submit to immoral authority. I bet you dont get that do you, as you promote that I dont pay tax and only the rich pay tax. I only shake my head at your stupidity... hopless. bet you come back with gramar or spelling corrections, for your incapable to see your self as a dumb coward submitter to liars theives and murders.

sovereign

Personally, I don't care

Personally, I don't care where the tax money goes, as long as Uncle Sam pays me what he owes me when the bonds mature.

worthless

you do not have a clue. Just totaly worthless. debt slaves like you need masters. May your slavery keep you happy just leave me alone.

sovereign

I think you're confused about

I think you're confused about who is the master and who is the slave.

Believe what you want, just pay your taxes.

Before Bush and the Republican crooks took over in 01

Americans owned 80% of the assets. 5 banks now own 80% of the assets. Shows you how dumb people are -re-electing Bush and now voting for another "oh we'll let God take care of it" clone of Bush aka SantoRom.

Government is supposed to protect our freedom, our property, our privacy, not invade it. Ron Paul 2007