New Paul Vs Romney Candidate Comparison Handout Sheet. Just Ron Paul Vs Mitt Romney And I Corrected The Typos

Hey Teachers! - I am a high school teacher and have unrestricted copy machine usage. Single and double sided printable information like this is perfect for us. Copy and distribute using your preferred method.

Please keep sharing this type of PRINTABLE information; this is what I wanted to be able to do with the super brochure.

Im gonna be printing these. thanks dude.

!

The U.S. Constitution is not part of the LDS scriptures. While it's true that LDS scripture says the Constitution is pretty special and should be upheld, the "and should be revered like any other holy text" should be dropped as inaccurate.

Also, Romney was not anointed a clergyman. Saying he held important leadership positions in the church at the local level would be accurate.

http://www.dailypaul.com/226318/ron-paul-only-candidate-able...

dont know if this might be usefull to add..

things are gaining traction... ^^

I so hope that people use the sheets to inform former Santorum supporters...

Thank You so very much!

This is PERFECT to stuff inside Super-Brochures.

Now that it has all been narrowed down to Ron Paul vs. Mitt Romney,
I will translate it into Spanish (I am in California) and will gladly send it back to you if you give me an e-mail address.

Some people are offering corrections. Are they right?

If so, get it FLAWLESS and I will send it back to you.

R[3]VOLUTION!

Write to me here:

myspaceresistance@gmail.com

I like. A few more things though:

1. I would suggest rewording this somehow:

"Would cut marginal individual tax rates by 20%."

That language I think is intentionally deceptive (i.e., Romney's campaign being intentionally deceptive) -- we shouldn't spread their deceptive propaganda for them. It may make people think their taxes will drop from 28% rate to 8% rate, while what it probably really means is a drop from 28% to 28%*(1-.2) = 22.4% rate.

From here:
"reduce individual income tax rates 20 percent beyond that, putting the top rate at 28 percent and the bottom rate at 8 percent, down from 35 percent and 10 percent today."

People at the bottom rate only get a 2% reduction (in "normal people speak"), not a 20% reduction.

2. Found one minor grammar issue:

"Actively campaign against SOPA" -> "Actively campaigned against SOPA"

3. I'm not sure this is the best way to go:

Will repeal Capital Gains taxes. End taxes on tips. Lower, then eliminate all taxes on Social Security. Eliminate the income tax. Give tax credits, for private & homeschooling, alternative energy, and health care. All without the need to borrow or add to the deficit.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that eliminating the income tax is a long term goal, not something Paul could likely fully accomplish during his presidential term(s). People will read that and think you are saying he is going to do it in the short term (like just "pass a law" when he gets in office), and then decide you are in fantasy land (especially when combined with "All without the need to borrow or add to the deficit") and may then be inclined to not trust any of the other statements on the comparison sheet. I think it would be good to be very careful with this subject so that we don't trigger such a response in people.