IRS: Failure To File, let's address something shall we? Do we have a major labor dispute?Submitted by The South on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 19:08
I've got a question: Maybe some of my legal friends here can help me out.
Do We Have A Major Labor Dispute Here?
The IRS comes after you for "Failure To File", but they sure do seem to leave out one important little bit of info: Who is actually liable for the tax?
Well, lets put on our reading glasses and take a look shall we?
If we go to USC Title 26 ss 6331 and read Section A, we get this:
Excerpt: " Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official."
Yeah, they seem to conveniently leave out Section A, but sure are quick to point out Section B (wink).
Are YOU an officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia?
If you're not, and they are charging you a tax on your income, don't we have labor dispute here? Um, I haven't received my government check yet, have you? I mean it says right there in their very own code, that they may Levy wages of officers, employees, etc. of the United States, the District of Columbia, etc. which is fine IF you're an officer, employee, etc. of that Corp/Territory.
But what about those of us who are not? Are they just presuming we are? And if so, should we at least rebut those presumptions? I mean I'm not real smart, just a dumb ol hill-billy and all, but these are things that should be asked, wouldn't you agree?
Now lets ask another question: Why are they bringing YOU into US District Court in a case labeled UNITED STATES vs JOHN DOE, when on Feb, 21st. 1871 they passed the "District of Columbia Organic Act" ultimately dissolving the United States and is now the seat of government and not the USofA?
Should they be bringing you into the district court of the United States instead of the United States District Court? (spelling and capitalization do mean something, as well as the order of the words).
Again, I'm just asking questions here. Let's continue ...
The District of Columbia is a Territory and has jurisdiction over a territory (not a state) and the last time I checked, the state of (place state here) was not a TERRITORY. I'm not the one saying the District of Columbia is a Territory, THE CONGRESS says it.
So why isn't the District of Columbia bringing these charges against you instead? Could it be because legally they can't? Could it be because you're not domiciled in that Territory and they have no jurisdiction over you? Could it be because they're assuming you don't know this and are just hoodwinking you into believing you are liable for the tax, and that the United States has the jurisdiction to address you in this matter?
Does the United States, UNITED STATES even have jurisdiction in this deal?
I mean subject matter jurisdiction does matter, doesn't it?
Things that make you go Hmmmmmmm :/
Just a thought: They tricked us into believing Federal Reserve Notes were real money, which they are not. So if it's not real money, but only a "promise to pay me some real money at some time in the future", then beside the fact that I'm not a government employee as listed above as the only one's liable for the tax, how can they (a.)charge me a tax on income I've never received, and (b.)presume I'm a government employee that's actually liable for the tax? (c.) presume I'm domiciled in the Territory known as the District of Columbia? (d.)somehow have forgotten to send me my government check on the 1st and 15th, since they've been taking money out of my non-gov't check since the time I turned 18?(e.) possibly rebut all the claims made here...
Now another question:
Didn't the US file for Bankruptcy in 1933? If so, It's not YOU that doesn't have the money folks, it's THEM! Didn't they pass HJR-192 stating all public debt is now prepaid as a remedy for stealing your gold? That gold was your REAL money; they just replaced it with paper, and we bought it, hook line and sinker?
I guess I'm not real smart, maybe I should just go back to sleep like everyone else and forget it.
You have never been paid one red cent for any labor you've ever provided, it's a pipe dream.
If we don't hang together, we will surely hang separately.
Again, this is not in any way shape or form legal advice; only my opinions and questions. Do your own research!
Any of you legal beagle's or IRS agents out there that can offer me some help in this matter, feel free to jump right in and correct my assumption THAT this is all fraud, flat on it's face. Just post your comments in the comment section below so it's on the record :)
What's that you say? I can't bring up the bankruptcy and DoC Organic Act of 1871 in court? Ummm, can I object? I think this may be obstruction of justice; I think maybe someone is violating Title 18 (1503, 1621, 1346 and others).
And just in case this is being brought into this court as a criminal case under Title 50 "The Trading With the Enemy Act" ........ I come in peace :)
Edit: I forgot to give special Thank You to Rod Class who's taught me a lot this information via his radio shows on talkshoe.com
Just go listen to the last two shows on 4-10-2012 by scrolling down the page and finding the archives.
Is it possible we've making this whole IRS issue a lot harder than it needs to be?
Forget the IRS code/statutes, etc. and just address the main issue of the 1933 Bankruptcy; the fact there is no money; the fact you're trying to extort a tax out me, yet YOU the IRS/Gov have never paid me one red cent as being the employee you're assuming I am, and therefor, I think we have a MAJOR LABOR DISPUTE on our hands.
Everyone's trying to fight the codes and figure out some way around this and that; dig up some loop hole here and there, why not just go straight to the ROOT of the whole damn problem as soon as they approach you and never step a foot in a courtroom?
Have you studied Rod's IRS case with David Buess? This has been going on for 3 years. The IRS has changed paperwork headings; tried to move it to another jurisdiction; tried to switch Judges; tried to make this case GO AWAY, and Rod just keeps dragging them back into court. Now he's taking it to the Supreme Court; of course they won't hear it, but at least that proves his defense works. It's simple what's he's addressing in the court papers, and they don't want to deal with him anymore.
Go here and read Rod's IRS and NC Traffic Case, as well as get yourself a nice copy of the "Secret IRS Agent Handbook" where it says right on the front cover, that "The income tax is 100% voluntary" and "This book is NOT to be shared with anyone outside the agency" (I'm paraphrasing those quotes, but that's the gist of it) ... http://rayservers.com/blog
Rod (and neither should you) is not arguing whether or not the income tax is Constitutional, legal, etc. he's arguing "procedure"; they aren't following their own procedures, and this case will show you how to call them out on it.
God Bless you Rod, and all other's who've went before him and are currently in the fight to get this foreign corp out of our hair. One day soon, may those in prison be set free, because most of them seem to have committed no crime.