6 votes

Four dollars for a gallon of water? The dream of Monsanto and other corporations wanting to privatize water

Wednesday, April 18, 2012 by: Sarka-Jonae Miller

(NaturalNews) Four dollars for a gallon of gas is ridiculous enough, but $4 for a gallon of water could someday became a reality, that is if oil tycoons like T. Boone Pickens and water bottling companies have their way. Privatization of water in which companies control the public's water sources and free water is a thing of the past appears to be what Pickens and corporations such as Monsanto, Royal Dutch Shell, and Nestle are banking on to increase their vast fortunes.

Companies, brokers and billionaires are buying up groundwater rights and aquifers. Groundwater is necessary for agriculture and more water is needed to meet a growing demand for food. Many countries have already over-pumped their groundwater to feed increasing local populations. Combine this with climate changes and an ever-increasing strain on water resources due to a rapidly growing world population and you have got a future where water is called "blue gold" because of its scarcity and high cost.

Bleak future
The Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development estimates that half the world's population will reside in areas with significant water stress by 2030. According to a government report entitled Global Water Security, the demand for water will be 40 percent above sustainable water supplies with needs around 6,900 billion cubic meters due to population growth. By 2025, the world's population will likely exceed 8 billion people.

Private corporations already own 5 percent of the world's fresh water. Australia is an excellent example of a country already suffering from multiple water droughts. Farmers are selling water rights to brokers, unaware of the long-term effects.

The United States is by no means immune to these plots. Royal Dutch Shell owns groundwater rights in Colorado and oil tycoon Pickens is buying up all he can in Texas. He owns more water than any other person in the U.S. His plan is to sell the water owns, around 65 billion gallons annually, to Dallas and other major cities affected by droughts. Pickens hopes to profit off of desperation, saying "There are people who will buy the water when they need it. And the people who have the water want to sell it. That's the blood, guts, and feathers of the thing." He also owns a massive wind farm in the area and natural gas resources, but has admitted that he is no environmentalist, only an entrepreneur who goes where the money is.

Stopping the madness
The public might not even be able to rely on the government to do the right thing and protect everyone from private water owners buying up all the water and then selling it for as much as people are able to pay. Lawmakers in most states did not foresee water privatization because water was once plentiful. As such, in some cases the only people who legally have a right to stop water privatization plans are the people who reside on the water property. For Pickens and his land near the Ogallala Aquifer this means that he, his wife and three of his employees are the only people who have a say in his privatization plans, according to EarthFirst.com.

The only way people can fight this despicable process is to refuse to support it. Water districts across the U.S. are refusing to purchase water from private companies. If Pickens, Monsanto and others have no one to sell the water to then they will give up. They are only in it for the money. No buyers means no profit.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/035603_water_monopoly_privatizati...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Uhm... kind of shocked to see this on Daily Paul.

Property rights = you get to do what you want with the water on your land. Period. Places that say the water that falls on your land isn't yours are ridiculous. It's your land, you get everything that's on it.

Governments, private entities get to decide whether they want to buy from private water sources. End of story.

To call this a "despicable process" for selling what's rightfully yours is kind of ridiculous considering the site you're on.

On a side note, if you don't like some entities methods for acquiring land and/or how they manage it (or how they sneakily get legislation passed and invoke eminent domain to further their business), that's a totally different issue. Simply do what you may to protest their methods.

The president s newest

The president
s newest executive order gave the government rights to ALL food, water, and construction supplies located within the U.S. Either T. Boone has a plan, or he is gonna die a pauper..

Makes me want

To get in on the ground floor of privatized air stock.

Too bad we don't have a list of paid in members of Fed Reserve

According to law the Controller of the Currency in the Department of Treasury keeps the record of paid in shareholders of the Federal Reserve System.

If Doomsanto is a member, then it is the Federal Reserve that is financing this action.

Free includes debt-free!

Marketization not Privitization

the fed is private but bad know the difference marketization of water would be great.

yes, privatization does not mean free market competition

Conservatives tend to equate the two, but don't be suckered into handing your natural resources to a private monopoly.