Soldiers & Citizens Defense & Restoration of the Constitution Through Article V-A real plan.Submitted by Christopher A. Brown on Mon, 04/23/2012 - 15:33
Firstly, the current state of America is so unconstitutional that an Article V is too likely to be hijacked for many to accept. Therefore, this proposal assumes that citizens and soldiers know this fact and agree that the nation must be returned to a semblance of constitutionality before the convening of an Article V convention to propose amendments, if the constitution is to be preserved.
This is needed to prevent a "re-write" or the notion of "constitutional convention" or to assure that proper "adjustments" are made to our constitution.
There are three primary amendments which citizens and soldiers need to demand delegates agree to propose and amend from each state.
1) Amendment countering the abridging of free speech and the that of the press.
2) Campaign finance reform, (citizens united reversal +).
3) Securing voting systems and election reform.
The strategy is that the above are amendments which are proposed and ratified at the onset of a convention that have the potential, after an appropriate period of perhaps six months, to bring the nation to the brink of citizen constitutionality simply by informing citizens of events that media will never share. Amendment 1) needs to return the usenet to its former prominance. Dot com is unconstitutional and the constitutiona cannot be effectively defended or upheld there. Citizens will be started on the process of deeper unity based in constitutional principle and natural law.
The first obstacle is congress, and has been for 100 years. They have been violating the law, the constitution and their oaths since 1911. A man named Bill Walker sued all congressional members in 2006 due to these facts.
Currently there is a formal criminal complaint against all members of congress for this behavior.
An important formal step, but chances are the Attorney general will probably do nothing. And that, I and others would propose, is because we have suffered a covert infiltration of our government which is now quite complete, even at the state levels, which is why congress acted unconstitutionally for 100 years, evading their duty with Article V to see the infiltration completed. Accordingly, the maximum democratic involvement is required to overcome the embedding of infiltrations into states legislations in order for Abraham Lincolns words to be manifested.
"We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts
not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert
Abraham Lincoln, April 15, 1865
Democracy depends on opinion, opinion depends information, information comes from media, media is infiltrated, . . . democracy needs a change of conditions.
Soldiers are citizens and both of those are logically the only people of this nation that WILL act to defend and restore the Constitution. It is very likely that this specific proposal for constitutional defense is too functional and legal for any current politician to support until citizens rally behind it. There are some constitutional politicians, but considerable support for an Article V convention needs to be created before they will break ranks from the status quo political environment.
In that case, it is up to soldiers and citizens to begin that support IF the constitution is to be defended and prevail.
First the soldiers direct legal inquiry into the "lawful military authority", a status which is required for orders to be binding. This is direct legal defense of the constitution by soldiers which has ultimate constitutionality, something logically intrinsic to defense of the constitution from a domestic enemy. Only a constitutional civil government can bestow the status of "lawful military authority" upon our military. When citizens present enough evidence of unconstitutional civil government to soldiers, to substantiate the presence of espionage and sedition explaining usurpation's of the constitution, soldiers who have pledged their lives to the constitution have the right, and even the duty to break rank and make inquiry upwards into the chain of command over them.
A "lawful military authority" will immediately provide a reasonable review with strict constitutional mandates controlling the review, of the soldiers evidence. IF the soldiers evidence is reasonable and verified showing usurpation's, the chain of command MUST be prepared to use its legal system, wherein all members of that system have taken the same oath as the soldier, to identify and defend the constitution from the domestic enemy who has conducted or is conducting usurpation's of the constitution. The following link is a 3 page .pdf download of this draft of a legal pleading titled the "Soldiers Inquiry".
When the chain of command over the soldier fails to defend the constitution by providing authority to the soldier to make inquiry, citizens must file civil lawsuits; under United States Criminal Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115 § 2382, "Misprision of treason" or "concealing treason"; against those opposing the soldier seeking an order of inquiry. Soldiers using this legal method are acting to expose treason in pursuit of their oath to defend the constitution and any who oppose are working to conceal it. Very simple.
In the absence of free speech which can have the intended and needed meaning, citizens need a special tool of technology to make the internet serve constitutional defense. Currently it is very well infiltrated and Obama advisor Cass Sunstein recommended "cognitive infiltration" of activists group on the web as well as the ground in 2008. There are many articles written on this. The word "cointelpro" was invented inthe 197-0's to describe known infiltrations then. Any who would like to see the links, ask. Not the topic here so I'm not posting them even though they are activities which threaten the constitution.
The following 3 page ,pdf download describes a internet forum software that does not yet exist, but can quite easily. All that is required is a dedicated software programmer who has considerable skill and knowledge. If any such read this and are willing to do this in defense of the constitution, count on my assistance in conceptual development of algorithms etc., that I might do. firstname.lastname@example.org .
The software puts the reasonable, lawful, citizens agreements at the most visible point for all citizens so they may join and give birth to informed opinion capable of true democracy.
Enough description of these methods and tools for constitutional defense. Do you really believe that any politician will do what needs to be done from this current sociopolitical environment? Time for action, then constitutionalists like Ron Paul can be free to do what needs to be done without suffering the unconstitutional criticism of the infiltrators that surround them. Readers need to realize this is it. Your last real opportunity to defend your constitution and your future well being, freedom and rights.
I hereby certify that all downloadable documents of this post are solely of my creation and given freely for defense of the United States Constitution,
April 23, 2012, Christopher A. Brown