Justice Sotomayor: Tax Evasion, Perjury - What Did Obama Know and When?Submitted by dph on Thu, 04/26/2012 - 15:33
It seems hundreds of pages of well documented evidence might have been presented to Congress before confirmation and now to the presidential campaigns. Oddly, none of it came up during the hearings, or much of anywhere else.
This is a really good read:
From the linked article:
Dr. Cordero has put together a document addressed to the GOP presidential candidates. It it now up to supporters of those candidates to bring this issue to their attention as quickly as possible. Why wouldn't Romney, Paul or Gingrich jump on this like a june bug? As Dr. Cordero points out in his opening:
Dear Republican Presidential Nominee Candidates:
You have courageously criticized federal judges for being “activist” or Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sotomayor, P. Obama’s first justiceship nominee, for being “liberal.” Those are subjecttive notions describing matters of opinion; as such, they resonate only with some voters; their use can even indispose you with a block of them, e.g., Hispanics. This is a proposal, supported by my professional research on, and litigation experience in, the Federal Judiciary for you to base your criticism of federal judges, including J. Sotomayor, on their wrongdoing, which is a matter of objective evidence of their disregard of their duties and infraction of the law.