The Supreme Court announced today that it would l decide whether the Constitution grants individuals the right to keep guns in
Submitted by jmhenderson on Tue, 01/08/2008 - 14:03in
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/20/washington/20cnd-scotus.html
PASS THIS AROUND NOW!!!!!!
WASHINGTON, Nov. 20 — The Supreme Court announced today that it would l decide whether the Constitution grants individuals the right to keep guns in their homes for private use, plunging the justices headlong into a divisive and long-running debate over how to interpret the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the “right of the people to keep and bear arms.”
»
I don't like this...
Only because we don't have enough conservative justices on the Court.
Let's Reign! (Rev. 5:10)
Let's Reign! (Rev. 5:10)
Valrico (Hillsborough County), Florida
NO WAY..in my opinion, there is NO room for interpretation !!!
If this goes down...the streets will be where it is FINALLY decided.
Discover Costa Rica
And AGAIN!!!
And AGAIN!!! why isnt BIG MEDIA covering this!!!!!
FOLKS---- Please.... no
FOLKS---- Please.... no matter what those idiots in the supreme court say... NEVER EVER GIVE UP YOUR FIREARMS...
"Ineptocracy: a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confisc
This is big...
I am very surprised they would even debate such a fundamental issue. We desperately need constitutionalists on the Supreme Court. It's hard to get them with the Republicans and impossible with the Democrats. They all depend on their judges to enact more central governmental control agendas.
At least we would be assured that President Paul would nominate justices who did not serve the big government agenda of either party.
where to go for info
go to www.keepandbeararms.com for this type of information. or gunowners of America, which has endorsed the Good Doctor for President.