CNN ratings decline stirs "worries"

None of the msm are actually journalist. They are propagandist and sensationalist. MSM has actually been brought into the supreme court to decide if they are liable for spouting lies, propaganda and misdirection to the public. As I recall, the msm got off by being declared "entertainment." So there you have it and good riddance to the lot of them.

I have trouble believing anything the NY Times parades as "the truth". Their "exposé" on Apple turned out to be shameless click-bait. They have sunk below the National Enquirer.

Many people can't afford cable, and many more simply either don't choose to watch or simply refuse to have cable.

Besides, who wants to watch the same Wolf Blitzer rerun three times a day when he can get his news from the internet immediately?

More sweet MSM karma.

Another news outlet might have said "CNN ratings decline causes jublilation!"

was one of the first major propaganda outlets in the US.
It claims CNN presents "non-partisan news" in the same way that it thinks itself to present "non-partisan news".
Meaning that it's understood that they are both completely in the tank as propaganda outlets for the establishment on the left-leaning side.

The first thing to understand about these outlets is that they don't tell the truth.

Screw those bias bastards. Not only have I stopped watching them, I also canceled my TW cable and switched to a dish. Only picked up the dish because the wife had a fit when I suggested we just watch streams through our DLNA.

The last day I watched any msm.

may all those who read this, be one of them.

And they aren't buying what those networks are selling.

How on earth did this happen?!

Oh one wonders.

I hate msm, more than words can explain.

After the first St. Charles County Caucus went haywire (by design of the county GOP), I made sure to watch all three local news broadcasts (FOX, CBS, NBC affiliates) to check on their reporting of events - events I witnessed myself and knew firsthand.

Well, how did they do? Not one of the stations got the facts 100% accurate. Two of them were completely wrong in their take on events that day. Only one station even came close, with a few minor errors... and it was the local FOX affiliate, believe it or not!

And all this error related to a public event, where there were invited media (invited by the establishment) and tons of witnesses. Yet, no interviews... only a reporter sitting there telling us a 'story'. I have serious doubts whether the media gets any story, anytime, 100% correct. I view with suspicion the whole enterprise.

they would know that lying don't sell anymore!

then again, we're talking about MSM pressitute whores, for whom even IF they initially started out KNOWING that they were lying to their audience, eventually, after awhile they started to believe in their own lies, to the point that they cannot tell reality from their astroturfed propaganda 'news.'

Who knows, perhaps in a knee jerk overreaction CNN might figure that they need to cover Dr. Paul and the R3VOLution to have ANY semblance of truth.

Uh, NOT!

Like that's ever gonna happen, in 5 million years. Wouldn't it be hilarious, though? We get to annoy Dana Bash & John Roberts again. Ah... the memories.