Crickets on DrudgeSubmitted by Thimbleberry on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 10:45
I find it interesting that Drudge has no mention of Paul's victories in Maine and Nevada. Now why could that be? I have two theories.
A] Drudge has been bought off or at the very least is in the tank for O'Romney.
B] Drudge is helping the Paul campaign by keeping this down played so that Romney supporters relax into their arm chairs and remain in their fox induced stupor until the convention.
We all want recognition for what the Paul supporters have accomplished but maybe it's better that we don't get it. The delegate strategy seems to only work as long as the Romney supporters get complacent and stay home during the delegate process.
I think the media is in a catch 22. I think if they begin to talk about Paul then people will begin to think there is a chance he could actually win and that could cause a huge surge in support for Paul. On the other hand if they don't talk about Paul the Romney sheeple will stay complacent.
I think it's great strategy for the Paul Campaign to down play their chances. Yes it may discourage some people but because the Paul supporters are in it NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS and will stick with Paul through thick and thin, the Paul campaign can get away with down playing their chances.
Anyway that's my take. What do you think?