Can someone answer a question for me, Re: Delegates?Submitted by rpforever85 on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 09:37
Like many others, I've been following the rolling delegate totals frmo various sources. However, I tend to trust Mises the most.
But if you look at their projected totals, why are some states highlighted pink (denoting a relatively high level of confidence in the projection) when the state conventions have yet to take place?
For example, Kansas. A high level of confidence, but did we really not take ANY delegates at any of the district or state conventions? And the source for these numbers? http://www.thegreenpapers.com, which only reports PROJECTED delegate totals based on the primary/caucus results.
Is this simply an oversight?
Also, why hasn't the MSM reported on Nevada's results in the same way they are reporting Maine's? Is this just bias, or are there actual schematic differences between the Maine and Nevada delegation that I'm unaware of?