61 votes

KARMA: Clueless TSA PornGrope Convicted War Criminal Henry Kissinger!

Pardon me, was I grinning?

Globalist Tyrant reaps the Police State that he has helped sown
TSA Agents Conduct ‘Full Monty’ Pat-Down On Henry Kissinger

May 14, 2012 2:46 PM

NEW YORK (CBSDC) — Even a Nobel Peace Prize winner can’t avoid a pat-down.

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger got searched by a Transportation Security Administration employee while going through a security checkpoint at LaGuardia Airport in New York Friday, The Washington Post reports.

Kissinger, who was in a wheelchair, was told by a TSA agent that he needed to be searched.

“He stood with his suit jacket off, and he was wearing suspenders,” freelance reporter Matthew Cole told the Post. “They gave him the full pat-down. None of the agents seemed to know who he was.” Cole added that Kissinger was given “the full Monty” search.

Oh alright. Even Kissinger doesn't 'deserve' to be abused; that 'right' should be reserved to his cellmate, as he serves out his remaining days as the war criminal that he is.

Maybe the Nobel Peace committee that moronically awarded him can now at least 'repent' by providing him with a few books on his own warcrimes while serving out his term, to reflect on what he has committed, a last ditch effort to invoke some conscience, if he has any left.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm sure the TSA...

gave old Hank more action then he's seen in the last 25 years! The agent should have been the one running away screaming. but i wont be satisfied until Bush or Obama have to watch their own daughters get patted down like a lowly slave to the fatherland

Visit https://soundcloud.com/politics-of-freedom for all recent Ron Paul interviews, speeches, debates, forums, panels, press conferences, news coverage, and Texas Straight Talk updates!

"Terrorism is the war of the poor, while war is the terrorism of

That's Great!

I love how the TSA morons are too stupid to know who he is.

Like Henry Kissinger travels on passenger jets.....

Really? So we're supposed to believe he flies on these passengers jets with the "common man" routinely? If anyone expects us to believe this man doesn't travel on a private jet, given his affiliations within our shadow government, as well as the level of loathing the public has for him, this news article can be considered nothing more than an attempt at bad comedy.

The next time they stage an event like this with Kissinger, I hope they conduct a strip search and probe of his anal cavity to make it more believable....and enjoyable for the reader.

Even if you were boarding a

Even if you were boarding a private jet wouldn't you still have to go through the TSA checkpoint to get to the gate?

Yep; Henry Kissinger flying commercial?? I doubt it.

It was probably a Henry Kissinger look-alike hired to make it look like if it's good enough for that war criminal Kiss-(my-@ss)-inger, then it's good for the likes of the rest of insignificant lesser Americans!! I call BS on this one.

After promoting a secret war in neutral Cambodia and Laos

during the Vietnam war that dragged those poor folk into a world of pain and misery, I scarcely believe Mr. Kissinger would experience any shame or embarrassment. The man has long ago shed any redeeming human emotions in the pursuit of power and pride.

If anything, Kissinger is probably was pleased to see the TSA as one of the fruits of his and others dirty work over the years in dismantling liberty. I hope on judgement day I can witness the look on his face as he stands before the thousands of victims who suffered by his Machiavelli policies.

Conscience does not exist if not exercised

"No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up!
---Lily Tomlin

TSA agents stripped searched

and found the blood of thousands of others on him.

If Dirt Were Dollars
Quoting from the scriptures
With patriotic tears
We got the same old men
With the same old fears
Standing at attention
Wrapped in stars and stripes
They hear the phantom drummers
And the nonexistent pipes
These days the buck stops nowhere
No one takes the blame

But evil is still evil
In anybody’s name

If dirt were dollars
We’d all be in the black
D. Henley, J.D. Souther, and D. Kortchmar

As bad as Kissinger and Nixon were...

...when they decided to do something illegal, they had the decency to show enough shame to try to keep it secret.

They respected the law enough to break into the Dem HQ at Watergate in secret.

They respected the law enough to send troops into Cambodia in secret.

When they got caught doing illegal things, there were resignations and criminal proceedings.

The Bush and Obama White Houses no longer respect the law even that much. Now the rule is that the President can do whatever he wants, and as soon as he says "9-11!" the law is suspended.

Minor underlings at the Justice Department can suspend laws and treaties against torture by writing a memo.

Military forces can be sent to any country at the President's whim and he can not only ignore the constitutional requirement to declare war, he can even ignore the bogus War Powers Act requirements.

And when they're caught breaking the law and it's on the front page of the New York Times, no one resigns and no one is prosecuted. They run out the clock ignoring subpoenas and getting lawsuits dismissed on the basis of "national security" until the Congress retroactively legalizes their actions or the next President says "We want to look forward, not back".

Having Nixon and Kissinger back would be a distinct improvement over what we've currently got. That's how bad things are now.

So let's not celebrate Kissinger's humiliation. As bad as he was, we could do worse, and did.

Sorry, I don't buy it.

Tyranny is still Tyranny, whether done in the dark or brazenly carried out in the broad daylight. Whether tried and convicted or left still at large, they ALL were criminals to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and deserve the same scorn and ridicule.

Saying Nixon and Kissinger weren't so bad as Bush and Obama is akin to saying Mussolini wasn't as bad as Hitler because he at least made the trains run on time!

Minimizing the atrocities Mussolini committed in Ethiopia and Libya because they were in smaller scale that Hitler's genocide of the Jews doesn't excuse the lesser of two evils, anymore that it is to excuse Kissinger and Nixon to the larger sins of Bush and Obama--They still are both evil!

Conscience does not exist if not exercised

"No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up!
---Lily Tomlin

Won't Read It!!!

...hands over eyes...blanking out all thoughts...feeling dread. Seriously, I'm flying from San Diego to Atlanta tomorrow.

Can't stand airports...

fonta

Dirty Old Man

He probably enjoyed it, actually.

(Totally thought he was dead.)

It's judge Nap so go ahead and hit Fox

Judge Napolitano on Use of Drones in US: Congress Is Going to Look the Other Way and Let the Air Force Spy in Our Backyards

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/05/14/judge-napolitano-on-use...

yep youtube would be better

I am always amaized how some RP supporters

use populist slogans to further their personal agenda.

"Convicted War Criminal Henry Kissinger!" And why Condie Rice (the National Security adviser) and Colin Powell (the Secretary of State) are somehow better? The same answer - Jewish name AROUSES mob and weak minded. At the same time, populist empty slogans turn many potential RP supporters off.

I do not hear much outcry from RP supporters against "good" Catholics - Janet Napolitano and Panetta.

um, have you tried

searching DP archives?

If you have, you'd realize how ridiculous this: "I do not hear much outcry from RP supporters against "good" Catholics - Janet Napolitano and Panetta" sounds to anyone who's been a DP member for a while, or even to those who aren't members, but who may have been merely lurking here since 2007.

Is today like 'make controversy out of nothing'-day?

Guess I missed the memo.

They're ALL govt terrorists. Satisfied?

By the way search "govt terrorists" on DP and see who's avatar comes up most often, along with "The State/The Leviathan."

You do realize your own characterization tells the world much more about yourself, right?

So you're saying that you using this: "use populist slogans to further their personal agenda." is NOT YOU furthering "your agenda" to push Panetta & Napolitano (no relation to the Judge) that they too are guilty? Not that there's anything wrong with that assertion, because most of us here AGREE with you.

Also, you do realize that most here would readily agree with you that MOST upper echelon statist govt commissars are all equally warcriminals, right?

You know why I didn't cite Condy, Panetta or DHS Nap in this blurb?

Because none of them had a CBS article citing that they were porn-groped by the TSA, today.

Yup. My "agenda" really was that simple.

For the love of God, can we not find dispute, where there are none, today???

Uh, too late, only got 40min. left before it becomes Tuesday. Then a whole new 24hrs of prospective 'non-dispute dispute' to look forward to, from some.

LOL

I kid, 'cause I love.D

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Do not fecal from this article to other links.

This is about TSA groping. Both Napoletano and Panetta were involved in the decision making of the TSA.

Instead of condemning TSA once more, I see distraction about Kissenger. If you set standards too high, then you should also blame our parents and grand parents who have been electing all bad politicians - and that is the majority of Americans. (If your parents are immigrants from Eastern Europe, UK monarchy or you are a muslim student, then concentrate on politicians of this generation.)

RP supporters who jeer about groping of the old man put themselves in the same category as progressives who jeered when TSA groped Ron Paul.

You do realize that I agree with you on this issue, right?

By the way, was there some Anti-AntiZionist Sheriff election at the DailyPaul that I never heard about? Because seeing your past comments, you definitely seem like you were running for it. Still, I definitely wouldn't have voted for you.

LOL

"Do not fecal from this article to other links."

And just WTF what makes you think anyone's gonna abide by your little petty verbal dictates at a Ron Paul site, you know where people tend to lean pure Constitutionalist/Minarchist to Anarcho-Capitalist?

And what would be the consequence for not abiding by your verbal dictates? Should I fear for my precious QWERTY's life?

I seem to have missed your point.

At what phase of your logical deduction did you think it was prudent to demand others to discuss a topic with the minutia, a level of specificity that only waxes you satisfactorily, at a constitutionalist/voluntaryist leaning Ron Paul forum, again?

"This is about TSA grouping."
- No, the article blurb is specifically about Kissinger being groped. Kissinger, who is a convicted warcriminal. A fact I merely cited, which in it of itself is merely descriptive, and non-agenda-ed.

"Both Napoletano and Panetta were involved in the decision making of the TSA."
- Yes, but so were GWB, Cheney, Chertoff, Muller, Markus Wolf, Tom Ridge, John Mica, L3 Communications, Raytheon, Boeing, etc. etc. etc.

Lucky for my carpal tunnel, other than Kissinger, they weren't the ones specifically groped that day, by the TSA.

Want to provide me with a timeline so that I can cite only those statist corporatist panopticon tyrants who fit into the specific time frame to your satisfaction? Should I dig deeper and go into PROMIS/NSA/FBI/CIA precursor to DHS control grid? Would that satisfy you? Or how about the Jekyll Island founding of the Fed. Reserve, since whatever govt/corporatist fascist project, they'll be 'paid' with FRN's, inevitably. No?

"Instead of condemning TSA once more,"

- Hm, while I'm not demanding, like you, to check my past DailyPaul threads on the TSA, but if you did, you'll find that I kinda do that regularly. Did I get your approval? Did I? Did I?

"I see distraction about Kissenger."
- Well, he is a pretty funny looking a-hole sh*tbag to laugh at. And oh I so enjoy my distractions.

"If you set too high standards,"
- Do you feel sane, because I'm not sure anymore. Didn't know I had to abide by a verbal/literal prior restraint of fulfilling a set of arbitrary standards that I can give two f*cks about.

"you should blame our parents and great parents who were electing all bad politicians - and that is the majority of Americans."
- Um, I should? Like now, now? But my folks are such sweet couple! Blame them? Wow, since you told me to, guess I should! Okay, done!

Mine never voted for them. But I'm assuming you're courteous enough to include yourself and your parents into that broadstroke assumption too, right?

"(If your parents are immigrants from Eastern Europe, UK monarchy or you are a muslim student, then concentrate on politicians of this generation.)"
- Can't tell what you're talking about. Are you waxing a E.EU/Muslim-fetish Haiku? Are you sure you're okay? Because now I'm doubly unsure about you. Besides how would you know whether Kissinger is, or is not from my "generation?"

Hold up, we were talking about a minor, petty, somewhat comical CBS blurb about Kissinger being TSA-porngroped and me admittedly laughing sophomoric about it and merely citing the fact that he is a globalist POS warcrimal, which are all true and factual description, right?

Because you know, dickheads facing Karmic Comeuppance, even a minor nuisance? Kinda funny.

Suggestion: when someone kinda seems to be in agreement with your geopolitical worldview, it's not necessary to pick an unnecessary dispute, especially one in which your verbal diarrhea is insufficiently utilized, and/or alluded to poorly for effect.

Really, I'm kinda getting dizzy from all the verbal methane you've gathered, I forgot why I was replying to you in the first place...

Oh right. We both agree??

Huh?

Er... then why are we debating this non-controversy again?

Reply, when you learn to utilize some netiquette. As this will be my final reply on this matter with you.

Ciao, Anti-AntiZionist Sheriff.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Completely ridiculous. Who

Completely ridiculous. Who even new Kissinger was Jewish but you. Go back to the progressive swamp you were marinated in.

Progressive swamp? Nice try, but kind of feable.

Tell me why Kissenger is a war criminal, but C. Rice is not? And why politicians in Congress, who supported Vietnam war and all other wars, are not criminals? So why so much emotions about Henry?

Henry did not advocate Patriot act, NDAA, TSA, issued military orders, approved waterboarding or killed 16 Afghani women and children and painstakingly burned them.

it's always a good idea to spell properly, especially if one

is to feign intelligence, while attempting ridicule.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feeble

got irony much?

So how long do you think you'll last, before the Mods give you the boot?

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Thank you for

pointing out the typo.

If my posts disturb you to the point you feel being compelled to respond, that may be an indication that you are more comfortable in a collective where everybody blows the same horn.

you're very welcome.

I'll return your horns when I'm done drinking out of it.

Seriously, you've just become my favorite source for fulfilling, my daily non-sequitur bemusement quota. Initially I wanted your Trollolla Arseusness gone, but it's too good. Please stay.

A: "If my posts disturb you to the point you feel being compelled to respond,"

B: "that may be an indication that you are more comfortable in a collective where everybody blows the same horn."

You do realize that the two clauses have no basis in positing a literary nexus, right?

1. One does not need to be "disturbed" to feel compelled to respond. That in itself is an erroneous a priori unsubstantiated presumption to begin with.

2. You would had to have established that the observer possesses a level discernment spectrum to be able to determine whether what he observes can be construed to indicate anything. Which by your failure to establish any substantiation for the basis behind what may prompt one to, or not, respond, you've just negated your efficacy in determining whether you're capable in determining what can or cannot "indicate" anything.

3. Since you've self-established that you cannot determine the basis for adjudicating any indication, anything that follows, ie. your attempt at snide passive aggression is also negated by the fact that you now hold no intellectual high ground to discern whether you're even qualified to deem a ritual involving a given set of demographic blowing the said "horn" instrument would be a good, or a bad thing. Let alone whether one should inherently take offense to said such activity.

A person who has already previously established a penchant for tyrannical control freakdom (as per your Kissinger request) as demonstrated by your need to have others talk about a very limited range of topic that you've self-arbitrarily decided that you may impose and demand of others (how very liberty minded of you), has no business chiding others for having or not having any collectivist inclinations, when the charge is being made by a collectivist himself.

Wait, scratch that. One would have to be a collectivist to charge what is or is not an inherently collectivist activity.

Thanks for the Hardy Har Har.

Shall we go again?

Actually I have some java brewing worth more tending.

Ciao AAZ Sheriff, twice, twice.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Candasleezy Rice IS A WAR CRIMINAL

NEXT!

They are ALL criminals.

Each and everyone.

beephree

Then do not forget to

add your parents who elected and supported all the criminals (unless you are a foreign student or fresh immigrant) and condemn your mother and sister for supporting racist affirmative action laws.

ecorob's picture

lying bs...

he flies charter everywhere in the world with his private entourage

this was staged and it probably sickened him to have to lower himself to the underlings...except he enjoyed being groped because he is a sexual deviant and that is how history will remember him...

a sexual deviant that tried to destroy the world

hitler, rockefeller, kissinger...birds of a feather

bush, clinton, gore...more of the same

hidden in the bushes...wolfowicz, rumsfeld, paulson, geithner

shall i go on?

i certainly can

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

that's what I was thinking

These globalists don't usually fly commercial with the common folk.

RP R3VOLution

"Nobody knew who he was"

Ha, Ha! Best part.

Ann in Florida

sad thing is, I just asked a

sad thing is, I just asked a friend who is actually faily smart and knowledgeable, which religion Henry Kissinger subscribed to, in response to a reply above. his response? "who is henry kissinger? lol.

emalvini's picture

Kissinger Probably Couldn't Wait To Be Groped..

Kissinger is a mover and a shaker. Why he goes throught these security lines and allows himself to be groped is beyond me. Could you see David Rockefeller going through this nonesense? I think not. Kissinger probably enjoys being fondled. That is my guess..

In Europe, it is well known that Henry the "K" is a lover of little children, if you know what i mean.

He is a sick puppy!

I would love to be that TSA scoundrel

Would have give Henry a poke, get him ready for his retirement home behind bars.

sovereign