0 votes

TIME has written an article about us RP supporters!

The Story of Ron Paul’s Presidential Candidacy as Told by His Supporters in Our Comments Section
By Adam Sorensen | @adamsorensen | May 16, 2012

"Most people have hobbies: golf, model trains, restoring old cars, whatever. A year after Ron Paul announced his Republican presidential bid, I have concluded that his supporters must not do these things. They can’t possibly have the time. While others are at rest or at play, Paul’s supporters are on the Internet, googling his name and diving into the comments sections of news articles to register their opinions. Maybe it’s a measure of their dedication or their web savvy, or both. I don’t know. But they always show up, sometimes 500 or 600 in force or more. And since they often complain about the media giving their guy short shrift, I thought I’d give them a chance to tell Paul’s story, now that it’s in its last chapter. (There, the media just did it again.) What follows is a collection of comments, culled from TIME’s archive, that span the epoch of Ron Paul 2012."

Link: http://swampland.time.com/2012/05/16/the-story-of-ron-pauls-...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well

The "journalist" was miffed at being called names.

Which is why name-calling never works as a way to elicit better behavior or change.

Folks, if you don't sling insults, then those "arguments" can't be used against you.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

To me this is a free Ad. I'll take it.

.I think this will cause people to Google Paul and find out more about him. That enthusiasm is contagious...the pic is great.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

The Picture

Is worth 1,000 words.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

Copy paste and email it to me please

I will not visit any main stream any longer. I can wait a day or so to read it.

How much do you wanna bet...

... that these kinds of articles were already written a while ago and they've just been waiting for Ron to "give up"? They still don't get it and we're still getting those delegates.

Time has been controlled for a long long time.

I will not give them any hits. They are old media and irrelevant. Fk Newsweek and Time. They lose.

reminds me of quote

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years.

It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government.

The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller - June, 1991

egapele's picture

Okay, so I give both of you a +1

I completely get where you're coming from - we are a very, very powerful group of people and we shouldn't turn our attention where it's not due; however, articles like this are PROOF that they are acknowledging that we have been too much for them to ignore. In the future, we'll be seeing articles from them showing proof that they are acknowledging that we're not going away.