John Mccain knew he was going to win!

0 votes

I have read the book Votescam which I reccomend to all of you. Hard to find and banned by Barnes&Noble back in the 90s. Solid evidence significant mass vote fraud has existed since the early 90s. New Hampshire was a rigged election. Mccain knew in advance he was going to win. Watch the ABC Debate compared to all the rest. The others he looks afraid. In the recent ABC debate he has this smile on his face as if he knows he's going to win. He should have been afraid of losing to Romney being right beside Massachusettes and the amount of money Romney spent. If you notice Mccain's behavior in the media in general the past couple of days, he has this same look on his face like haha im going to win and there's nothing you can do about it. Then they called it on all the media networks after like 30% had voted. Scary and Sad.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No big deal

The McCain campaign (and all the major campaigns) do polling so yes he knew he was going to win.
The media does exit polling and they know which are the historic swing districts. When the 2 lined up to show a McCain win they called the state.

he won huge in 2000

Allot fo the same supporters. He also has large reputation for gaining bi partisan support. His name is well known.

Very wird

Check this out

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23414

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html

check out this thread too &

check out this thread too

& view the results at the link posted (boston.com)

the numbers on the chart (NOT the totals, but the numbers in the columns) show Ron Paul way up top, but the totals have a totally different number that don't correlate with the precinct-by-precinct numbers!

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23414#comment-196480

Find out how "entangling alliances" interfered with the rights, and honor, of these U.S. Navy sailors from the USS Liberty www.ussliberty.org

For me

it was the Frank (FYF) video. For those that saw it, remember Frank wanting to bet the Paul supporters that the Doc wouldn't make the percentages they were tossing out -- I could see in his face he knew something that we didn't.

But, then again, my husband says I need to stay away from the computer for a few days because I'm having a breakdown.

Good luck to us all,

Lisa C.
www.women4ronpaul.com

Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!

Fraud? Nah

Not unless you can prove it. If you can prove that, let's say you voted and it wasn't counted then there could be a case. There is talk of the hand-count for Obama had him winning while the computer votes went to Hillary.

Plus

McCain did have that support in New Hampshire, I just think people are just that stupid.

unfortunately you're right..

unfortunately you're right.. i was living in NH when he ran against bush and my parents "die hard liberals" who i turned into ron paul fans even voted for McCain... there is a serious love fest over him their....

I dont think he had that much support

He was doing terrible in the polls not that long ago then the media instantly catapulted him saying new hampshire voters were changing their mind about John Mccain. His support could have likely been fabricated.

Wilmington NC LOVES Dr. Paul

Wilmington NC LOVES Dr. Paul

In all seriousness -->

The only way things can happen like they did tonight is through computer fraud. The great thing about computers is that, a person or group of people can decide ahead of time what the numbers not just for RP will be, but for everyone will be. It allows a kind of control beyond just defrauding
one candidate.

But my friends, we must acknowledge that the fraud of the system runs much deeper. I say this not to discourage, but to clarify. Because, if your going to fight an enemy in any way whatsoever, it is WISE to KNOW FOR CERTAIN the truth about it/him/her etc. Guessing does not help, and tends to confuse people and divide the effort of people.

I believe that computer fraud was committed, and I further believe that the PTB have officials under their control who assist in this process - this is why no one can watch the counting of the votes - if they could, it would ruin their conspiracy.

After all, they get to hide all their other conspiracies very easily since the others are not under the watchful eye of the public. But voting fraud is unique in that we are aware of it, but cannot do anything about it. I cannot say what RP would have gotten vote wise, but I can say that there is no way HUCK goes from 1% to alot right after meeting with the CFR to explain "his solution" to the Iraq/middle east problem, and then Mccain goes from nothing to something right after an irrelavent Lieberman endorses him.

One thing consistant about the CFR and the people behind them is they have ways of telling their own what's going on and what decisions they have made. Thats why you saw those idiots snicker and giggle when Ron was on the ABC debate the other night. Ron came in at 8% in NH so it
"looks" like hes falling off just a bit. This is the psychological crap we are fighting, and regardless of what Ron decides to do from here on out, you must in your own mind, know that the PTB are lying to you once again - not out of anger or fear - but out of knowledge of what our enemies do because they cannot help themselves. I do think the PTB made a mistake in showing Ron going down a couple points, but well see.

As has been said by others, you all are watching a big show, and the only uninvited guest is Ron Paul. The PTB are not stupid, they are merely evil.
They know that if they ignored RP it would make him more popular, so they have chosen where to put him -> but in an obscure place, so hopefully most people will see him as unelectable.

That is what they do to candidates that do not bow to the empire.

I believe this is the strategy the PTB have chosen based on my observations. They have a few cater to RP while others deny him and slander him, he polls but he can't win a primary. Its essentially like the bully who holds the smaller kids head with one hand so his punches cant reach him as he flails away on thin air.

I hope people ALL of you now realize that vote fraud is not only a
likely possibility or a maybe, it has been done - twice. The
question is, what are YOU going to do about it?

I always found this suspicious:

Remember when "progressive" Ned Lamont was running against Lieberman in 2006? He was a real threat, someone who seemed radical, who seemed to want real change (the "anti-war" candidate).

Year 2000, Connecticut Senate election results:

Lieberman 828, 902 63.21%
Phil Giordano 448,077 34.17%
Total votes cast 1,311,261 (for 4 candidates total)
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000senate.htm

Then 2006, with Lamont:

Lieberman 563,725 50%
Lamont 448,077 40%
Total votes cast for 1,131,692 (5 candidates total)
http://us.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/

Now what do you think the likelihood is that a challenger 6 years later got the SAME EXACT number of votes?!

Find out how "entangling alliances" interfered with the rights, and honor, of these U.S. Navy sailors from the USS Liberty www.ussliberty.org

So the people rigging the

So the people rigging the election made sure that the challenger got the same number of votes. Why would they do that? It doesn't make any sense. I think you've stumbled on an odd historical fact and nothing more.
I live in Ct and voted for Giordano in 2000 and Lieberman in 2006. (Lamont was scary for more reasons than the war.)

wow that IS unbelieveable

truly, something is fishy

For an informed citizenry, individuals must discard the television set in favor of the acquisition of information via either books and/or the internet. An uneducated populous will remain in ignorance and thus continue to suffer the sharp ax of tyranny.

and how bout that long

and how bout that long written victory speech he had???

EXACTLY....they "called it" only....

TWELVE minutes after the polls closed!! How did they know?? Maybe.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs

I agree completely

Like how smugly he said keep troops in Iraq 100 plus years knowing that 70% of Americans want us out. just think what this says to the world, him getting the most votes from Americans.

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free".
Goethe

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free".
Goethe

Very Perceptive

That's like when Dick Cheney smugly pronounced the percentage totals in 2004. They knew they were going to win. McCain is a piece of trash, NWO minion who knows who makes the puppets dance.