| |
  
|
||||||||||
RP beat rudy in exit polls
Submitted by obscure titles on Wed, 01/09/2008 - 08:17
Fox is the only one I found that posted the raw data. http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008/01/09/new-hampshire-repu... All other candidates, republican and democrat, had accurate exit poll positions, except for RP and Rudy. Do the calculations yourself and see if my math is right. » |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
Rounding errors
I think that those numbers are pretty darn close to what happened. If you add up the male and female votes you get Ron Paul with 8.92% and Rudy with 8.88%.
I think the rounding errors could account for the slight difference. They only have the percentage in whole numbers.
I'm surprised that with only 1400 respondents they got so close to the real outcome.
Can't Hold It Back --
Barf!
Close? Opposite sides of a coin --
Vote RON PAUL 2008
Vote RON PAUL 2008
Makes Me Sick To See This --
Vote RON PAUL 2008
____________
Made (makes) me sick to see this smiling jerk (GIULIANI) even register on the board // I believe him to be dirt that can't be cleaned.
This video helps me understand HOW this might be the case:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs
Vote RON PAUL 2008
Your math seems correct..
but don't forget the dynamics of the people voting, my guess is that the supporters of Dr. Paul are far more likely to take part in an exit poll than Guiliani's supporters would be. Don't get me wrong I am a firm believer that vote fraud is a way more common occurance in this country than any of us would like to believe. I am just saying that this exit poll data doesn't show Dr. Paul beating Guiliani soundly, it's by something really close to 1/2 of a pecentage point, and that amount (5 votes out of 1000) could easily be explained by lack of Guiliani voters taking part in exit polls.
The reports coming in from NH from people who for sure cast votes for Dr. Paul and he still recieved 0 votes in their precinct are very worrysome and definately need to be looked at, and we need to all be on the look out for problems such as these, I just don't think this exit poll data is the smoking gun it first appears to be.
Dont see how Rudy finished where he did then
After reading those numbers I have to agree with you.
Maybe these are beginnings
Maybe these are beginnings to very complex answers:
http://www.mediamax.com/djskiefer/Hosted/stats.pdf
http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php
please double check my math.
please double check my math.
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994
almost 99% haven't voted yet
We must learn from these early results,
Obama and Paul 'volunteers' were turned away as observers, because they didn't have the right 'paperwork'.
There's no substitute for getting 'hands on', to turn out the votes!
"it's not important who votes, it's who counts the votes"... :)
-the master of engineered elections joseph stalin.
The earliest primaries are most likely of all of them to be 'gamed', watch the Clinton and McCain big party vote machines and how they work, every detail is controlled.
-absentee ballots, counting ballots, lists of voters, free rides, etc.
but 99% of Americans have yet to vote,
The biggest results are yet to come!
:)