15 votes

Harvard To Be Tried for Research Fraud

11 May (AHRP) – The US Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit has overturned a summary judgement by a lower court ordering a whistleblower lawsuit filed by Dr. Kenneth Jones against Harvard Medical School, its teaching hospitals, Brigham and Women’s and Massachusetts General Hospital, and Dr. Marilyn Albert (Principal Investigator) and Dr. Ronald Killiany to proceed to trial.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Fraudulent, government-funded Alzheimer's research

The incestuous relationships between presidents; the politically-appointed czars heading federal agencies; and corporations (which feed presidents, Congress, federal agencies, and universities alike) must end. Power concentrated in the hands of so few MUST be decentralized.

This particular case concerns Alzheimer's research. As the article notes (applicable to all such medical research, also drug testing):"Vulnerable human subjects are being shamelessly exploited in invalid, most often commercially driven experiments."

The current system is rife with conflict of interest. This also includes the court system, as this case shows (not to mention Dr. Burzynsk's, re cancer treatment), i.e., with respect to the lower court. Good thing there was ONE GUY willing to ruin his career and likely bankrupt himself to go up against the machine in the hopes of exposing the TRUTH.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

I dropped out of a PHD program in pharmacology after being so

disgusted at this legalized high tech welfare system.
There are sooo many ways to collect money in labs!


Your integrity...

...will be blessed.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Multiply that case

times just about every other case that "science" is "researching" for somebody else's buck or cause.

It has been known for years that the "monied special interests" have been funding the research that "gives them the results they want". So, if the researchers want to be able to afford to live, they give the special interests the results they want.
A big foundation or the gov't(essentially the same things) "see a need" for something that will advance their interests. They go to a "research" lab, and tell them they "need" a study which yields certain results, and they are willing to pay well for it, and keep the researcher from going hungry. The research is done, and the conclusion is what the special interest paid for, and this is then used to get some gov't legislation passed, or get some drug approved by the FDA, or whatever.
The entire scientific community is very suspect now, because of this.
I don't believe really anything the scientific community says, and haven't for many years. They are corrupt.

This is exactly how the "global warming" data was generated.
All fabricated and false.

grant funding

Just in case you're not aware, federal grant funding goes primarily through agencies like the NIH and NSF through a process of peer review which is exceedingly inbred and corrupt as you might imagine. Basically, it's a big club which gets to decide how to divide up among themselves the money they borrow from the Chinese on the assumption that the children and grand-children of the slaves will work to pay it back.

Aside from that phony "competition" a large portion of grant funding goes to the "top" institutions (Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, etc.) without any competition or accountability of any sort.