137 votes

Do you believe that Romney could actually be worse than Obama? Yes'+' or No'-'.

Day 1?

TransCanada - Keystone Pipeline

What is "Common Sense Healthcare Reform"? Romneycare perhaps?

2.1 trillion in defense spending.

I believe that Romney could actually end up being much worse than Obama.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Which Menendez brother was worse, Eric or Lyle?


They killed their father


and mother


It's a (Murdoch) family affair

Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal did publish Carol Paul's recipes last week, before her son sold out her husband on Murdoch's TV news station.

Two-headed coin of fool's gold

I would have had more respect for Rand had he endorsed the pitiful idiot who passed national RomneyCare rather than the Father of ObamaCare.


bush(GW)=clinton=bush(hw)=elite control

Romney will give us 8 more yrs of the same or worse

I'd rather have a liberty president in 4 years. Waiting for 8 years will drain the movement.

Plus, I think Romney's mandate is to seek global conflict. To sap us further economically through increased military spending while simultaneously accelerating the erosion of civil liberties.

A man with no soul is extremely dangerous. I vote no on Mittens.

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo

If Romney is

is part of this brain trust of saving money first standard at Bain Capital - take at look at this link and see how that logic worked out. http://www.gregpalast.com/how-bain-capital-helped-bpblow-up-...

They are the same

Its the Devil you know or the Devil you dont know.
I feel Romney is only there so he and the rest of his vultures can get rich selling off and outsourcing whats left of this country.
Anybody that cast a vote for Mitt Romney is a complete FOOL !

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

Yes, he could be worse

Romney is more likely to get us into a war with Iran, although both parties seem eager for it.

Romney has not stated anyplace where he would make significant cuts in the budget, but does want to spend more on the military. So the budget will remain wildly out of balance whether Romney or Obama is president. The only difference is that if a Republican is president it will be the Democratic rather than the Republican congressmen who pretend to be against raising the debt ceiling -- just as Obama opposed raising it back when he was a senator and Bush was president.

Neither Obama nor Romney will do anything to restore the Bill of Rights.

I wish people understood that

I wish people understood that they are both owned by the same people. It is like asking do you think employee A or B will work harder for their owners when both have proven that they will do and say ANYTHING. A great interview to watch is Aaron Russo. He talks about this around 12:00 minutes, but the whole interview is great.

I would highly recommend...

to check out the links above too.

The stuff on TransCanada-Keystone Pipeline, needs to be seen by all of us. We really need to know where we stand on that issue. It is being set up as one of the biggest political, lobbyist, corporatist blunders of all time. Too many "Good politicians" are using it, because they know that the general public is ill-informed about it.

Secondly, keep that "Common Sense Healthcare Reform" term in mind too. Looking at many local representatives web pages, a few of them have used that term too. Any time the word "Reform" is used by government, it means that it's most likely going to be a new government program for political gain for politicians, more wasteful spending by our government, and more taxes for us.
I personally see Romney's definition of "Common Sense Healthcare Reform" as Romneycare.

He will give it his best shot.

That's why he gets the big bucks.

In simple terms: yes. But...probably more like the same.

They are both puppets who want nothing but to win elections, gain power, and gain fame.

They are both willing to do whatever it takes to stay in power, and neither have any principles of their own on which to stand.

They are both malleable and pliable to TPTB, lobbies, special interests, and the military industrial complex.

They are both completely unconcerned with the needs of the American people, and are only seeking self-interested goals and are gathering "experiences" to put into their next book.

They are the same, but Romney would be "worse" if his masters want him to be. And I think they do.

Is there a "nothing will change" option???

If so, I'd vote for that. Because I honestly don't know if he will be worse or not. In some ways yes but in other ways no. We will have to wait and see I guess.

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeles

I believe you are correct--

why compare devil puppets, though--


it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--


It's almost like Rand could have just endorsed Obama... not a whole lot of differences.

The Bain of the Paul legacy

Yes, but growing up on a diet of newsletters, Rand knew he had to endorse the white Obama.

yes ....

I've been explaining my reasoning for some time now. Obama is a known evil. With Obama in the White House, people know we need to fight. Too many people fall for the false notion that anyone with an R behind their name is less evil. If Romney gets into the White House, the battle will weaken. The destruction will happen much more quickly then. IF given the choice between Romney and Obama, I'd say "Obama May Be the Best Choice for Conservatives" (originally published in Conservative for Change) http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150315611143746

Correlation does not prove causality!

Lieberman or Bolton for his Secretary of State?

'Nuff said.

Yeah...he's rapidly becoming known as "SLIME-knee" based

on the behavior of his minions in these primaries.


What's the difference? They both play for the same team.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...


Absolutely, sort of...

If the economic SHTF in this next term, which is pretty likely, I can easily see Romney presiding over massive state expansion. So, yeah, he could be worse than Obama has been SO FAR. But of course, Obama would do the same thing, so Romney wouldn't necessarily be worse than the FUTURE Obama.

Truthfully, there is very little difference between them.

Neocons are always worse because they deceive more

They bait people with conservativism, then go against their words. They had to st up an extreme ly active propaganda system that dramatically corps the conversations.

But hey, the dems aren't much better.

Democrats are no better-

but at least you KNOW what to expect.

One Cent Less!

Romney would only have to spend one penny less than Obama to go down in history as the greatest fiscal conservative of all time.


He serves the Zionest NWO. Obama serves the regular NWO. Rommney will get into war, actually before he's ever President. Obama is takeing his orders from Zbigniew Brzezinski who dosnt want a war in Iran and is a big Trilateral guy who is pissed off that the Zionest and Russia are doing everything wrong, whaaa. Either way it's BAD.

Romney would probably not be quite as

bad as Obama, but he will do as he is told, which is more than bad enough. If Romney were president, the Republicans would go back to sleep, thinking all is well, even though he would continue to betray us.


Who would have thought Obama Administration could have been worse than Bush Administration? Not very many I think. A Romney Administration will most possibly launch world war III.

For Liberty!

The ol

lesser of two evils argument. It's irrelevant since I'm not wasting a vote on either one.