49 votes

I HATE feminism!

The Philosopher posted the following comment on my post dealing with the public school system. I thought it was worth a thread of its own, and it is exactly what I would say on the subject.
For more info on Betty Friedan and her contribution to creating a totalitarian state see http://www.rense.com/gene...

'Womens Liberation' wasn't about freeing women to be able to work or anything else. Women were able to have and maintain jobs before the 1900's, even though, most people don't realize it due to their public education.

Womens Liberation was designed to motivate women to exit the homes, to shed the major responsibility of raising, nurturing and educating the children, to weaken the emotional bonds between child and mother as well as the emotional bonds to the father. We can see this already in our current time; when parents reach an age when they can no longer remain independent, what do the adult children do with them. Does the adult offspring take the elderly parent into their home to care for their parent; no, they stick them in an old age home and very rarely visit.

The system works like this:

The woman gives birth, she has 6 week off of work to look after her child. After the 6 weeks she must return to work, and at which time the child gets a nanny or goes to a daycare facility -where the child spends the majority of his/her waking moments with strangers.

At 4 years old the child now goes to nursery school, where again, the child spends the majority of his/her waking moments with strangers.

At 5 years old the child goes to Kindergarten, and again between Kindergarten and daycare, either before or afterwards, the child spends the majority of his/her waking moments of the entire day with strangers.

At 6 years old, the child goes to 1st grade where it spends 8 hours and then the child may have a babysitter or nanny until one of the parents come home from work; again the child spends the majority of his/her waking moments of the day, in the care of strangers. This goes on until the child is old enough to no longer need a babysitter or nanny; however, by this time the child has friends and homework and such, so he/she still spends a bare minimum of time actually involved with his/her parents.

Depending on the child and the parents, at about 14, 15, or 16 the child now spends their time after school with sports or friends; and again, the child spends a minimum amount of time with his/her parents.

At around 18, most children go off to college or get a job and eventually move out of their parents house.

At 21 to 22 years of age, the child's parents are more or less strangers to the child, because they(the children) spent the majority of their waking moments, since they were 6 weeks old, with people other than their parents.

The point being is that, ever since 'Womens Liberation' made it cool and desirable for the woman to leave the raising of her child in the hands of people who need to be approved by the State, children have been spending less quality time with their parents; thereby becoming less attached and less appreciative of their parents; leading to the disintegration of family and society.

This is very good for the State, since it makes money off of Certifying Daycare facilities, Creating Public Schools which have teachers unions which will always sway the votes for ever increased pay for the teachers. The State makes money off of the Accreditation of Colleges, Universities, and Trade Schools. The State even makes money off of Certifying the old age homes and all of the nurses, aids, and doctors which work there; and the State makes large sums of money off of the backs of the parents and children in the form of taxes.

The destruction of our Society is from two things: the education system and 'Womens Liberation,' without both of these two things the modern desensitized Slave would not possibly exist.

Plus, we shouldn't forget that since the 'Womens Liberation' the majority of society now is forced to have two incomes; because the introduction of the other half of the population into the workforce allowed the FED to increase the money supply without it being noticed as easily. Nowadays, families don't have a second income for the reasons of saving for retirement or buying a better house or whatever; now modern families are required to have a second income just to survive equally as well as families survived off of one income back before the 'Womens Liberation' movement happened.

But, I'm sure that all of these benefits to the State and the FED which have resulted from the 'Womens Liberation' movement were just 'Happy Accidents' for the State and the FED; it's not like it was designed that way or anything. It couldn't have been designed that way; the State and the FED just love us way to much to do something like that -of this I'm sure. ;)

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It has destroyed women's role

It has destroyed women's role in society. They have now became superficial beings that claim they don't need men. It has put the ordinary man out of luck in dating these women. It was designed by TPTB to be this way.

Women Against Feminism...pretty good read


"I don’t need feminism because…I’m tired to be, as a woman, represented by some hysterical hipster whores.

I don’t need feminism because I can hold my own beliefs without an army of angry vaginas backing me.

I don’t need feminism because I don’t think it’s necessary to belittle an entire gender in the name of equality.

I don’t need feminism because our sons are not inherent rapists and our daughters are not perpetual victims.

I don’t need feminism because it reinforces the men as agents/women as victims dichotomy."


A Message to Women - Paul Elam

Here's an article for you Gents


Men here aren't much better, but I'm sick of the women options in the USA...

MGHOW - post feminism

the war against men

link sent to me by a friend who moved to s.e. asia because of this issue. he's happy as a clam there.

Cyril's picture

Sacha Guitry's warning

Sacha Guitry's involuntary warning prediction about feminism:


"I would gladly admit that women are actually superior to men, if only they wouldn't be trying so hard, now, to put themselves as low as we can !"

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

you hate feminism...

then you must have 'white male privilege'


My only

problem with feminism or a women's right to choose is abortion.

Yes.. you have the freedom to do what you want. But nobody has the freedom to murder an innocent life.

The irony of feminism is

The irony of feminism is driving to work and all day I hear women complaining to each other how they wish they can be home with their kids instead of having to do the daily grind...

We all share this eternally evolving present moment- The past and future only exist as inconsequential mental fabrications.

my 2 copper

I will add the removal of the stay at home mom killed our neighborhoods ,sense of community and parental involvement in school.
What do you think mom did all day, dust?
She networked with other moms. Made friends. It was how the men met their neighbors. She was the one that planned and ran community events that brought us together. On the small scale maybe just dinner at the neighbors. On the large scale, how about the neighborhood Easter egg hunt or being a den mother for cub scouts/brownies.
Who was the local PTA? That would be a mom. Who climbed all over the school board if they tried to poison our kids minds? Mom.
Feminism was classical divide and conquer.
How well do you know your neighbors? Now you know why.
America needs its mommy back.

"You only live free if your willing to die free."

I vote this, todays best post.


The Women's Movement,

the result? Both members of a household have to work now in order to make the same money that one family member, traditionally the male would make when the pie wasn't divided up into twice as many pieces.

So its better now for "them". They doubled the tax revenues and the state gets to raise the children. ta da!

I hope you like it.

I am always pleasantly surprised at how many women are attracted and active in the Liberty movement. Patriots have this special light. The men, women and children active in the movement, all have it and they are actually in fact quite beautiful people. That being said, in my original post I wrote: "They" doubled the tax revenues and the state gets to raise the children... that was a quote from N. Rockefeller to Aaron Russo when Aaron ask him why the Rockefeller Foundation supported the women's movement and financed it. I guess "they" knew what the end result would be.

God forgives always. Man forgives sometimes. But Nature never forgives.

Cyril's picture

+1 "I hope you like it."

"I hope you like it."

(+1 for punchy comment and sarcasm)

Oh, no doubts that creatures such as R. Nancy Pelosi or Sen. Feinstein very much enjoy the show of all of it happening among the less fortunate members of their gender.

N'est ce pas, "mesdames"?

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Boy oh boy

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Cyril's picture

Feminism... yet another "-ism".


Feminism... yet another "-ism".

Hmm. Can't say that, Cyril! Okay. Fair enough.

Then, I DEMAND the right (and protection by Great Almighty State) to my...

eating-stinky-cheeses-and-leaving-them-in-the-fridge-more-than-two-week-long-although-I-could-or-should-eat-them-faster-... -ism !

Ha !

And NOBODY dare claim this is an indefensible silly idea !

I'll call them intolerant haters. (Especially if I'm denied the protection by Great Almighty State part).


Ha !


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

How about effeminitism?

Thweetheart you did not jutht thay that with your hair like that no, you are coming with me mithy now thit down and leth get you fixed up. And OH MY GOD what are we wearing for shoeth? OK thtay calm, we can deal with thith.

Thwear I don't know what you do without me thometimes.

Most of those who think so actually don't and most of those who think sew actually rip.

I hate feminism because they

I hate feminism because they want to kill babies. Why do they want all the babies dead?

I suppose you're talking about abortion.

Perhaps there are other aspects of feminism we might agree on.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

I agree.

Last night was very depressing.

Ron Paul on his son Rand Paul:
"he does a lot of things similarly, but I think he does everything better. Than I have done over the years,"

I hate feminism

Because they boil all arguments down to 'white male privilege'

Agenda: Grinding America Down

That the agenda of the feminist movement was part of the larger progressive movement is reflected in former Congressman Curtis Bowers' documentary Agenda.
Website/Trailer - http://agendadocumentary.com/trailer/
Documentary (full movie) - http://vimeo.com/63749370

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Home Alone America: The Hidden Toll of Day Care, Behavioral

Drugs, and Other Parent Substitutes

This book also covers points in the post.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Reminds us why libertarianism is insufficient

if our focus is only on freedoms, statelessness, and rights without also fighting for a healthy culture. The destruction of the civil society and the community has coincided with the rise in feminism and any other ism that promotes rights over responsibilities.

This is why the liberty movement needs conservatives as much as conservatives meed the liberty movement.

The right to vote for women

Changed everything, it gave the then "progressive" movement a whole new class of voter to pander to. We've never been the same.

Perhaps if they'd had the vote all along, the 20th century might not gone over to the progressive dark side.


Feminism did not destroy children

This is silly. Feminists asked for equal protection under the law and the same living standards for work and productivity. What destroyed this country was an obsession with productivity, in the absence of real growth in wage standards that have been frozen since the 1970s. The inflation of the currency is wiping out the middle class at a steady and alarming rate. The poverty line is no longer what it is listed and likely never was. However, in 1993, a can of pepsi, for instance, was 25 cents. It is now a dollar or more. Figure it out.



"Freedom is never easy in a world of tyranny" - ME

The feminists

...have destroyed our children, our families and the moral fabric of the western world. This is all one must do to destroy society.

A mother is like the Sun to our solar system. Everything revolves around her. Take her away and the planets wander off into space.

Ironically the post is full

Ironically the article is full of feminist grammar. I bet most people under 35 today believe that "them", "they", and "their" are singular pronouns. The article is careful to avoid use of the generic "he", "him", or "his", using the cumbersome he/she or his/her constructs and in one place referring to a human child as an "it".

I can forgive feminists for many things but not for trashing English grammar.

Another bullet point to add to your list.

Before "women's lib", the federal government's total take from a typical household was 25%, i.e.

Pre 1960 25% of the breadwinner's (man's?) income.

Post women's "lib", i.e. after 1970, the federal government's take increased FOUR HUNDRED PERCENT:

50% of the man's income + 50% of the woman's income, from 1/4x pre-1960 to 1/2(2x) after 1970.

Through "liberating" women from their traditional roles, the federal government's revenue take increased FOUR HUNDRED PERCENT.