NH RESIDENTS: What you can do to help with the recount
Submitted by mikiloe on Wed, 01/09/2008 - 15:34
If you are from New Hampshire, you Must visit this map
http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/nhmap-popup.html and identify any discrepancies in the reported results and what you have observed!
Many of these communities are showing 0 votes for RP and 500+ for "Other"! In the town of Sutton, NH, BlackBox Voting (www.blackboxvoting.org) has discovered 31 votes for Ron that were not reported.
Data is being collected currently at www.ronpaulwarroom.com.
We knew this might happen. Let's keep after this people.
»
NH volunteers - please observe the recount
contact granny warriors
Where are all the ballots
Where are all the ballots stored between the election and the recount? Do people trust that these ballots aren't tampered with--what is to stop it?
And then there is the whole issue of the crazy turnout--how can you legitimately check that false ballots weren't created?
Not that I really think that happened, but you never know, and we should have some system in place that makes sure that could never happen--do we?
I hope the residents of New Hamshire jump in and help
GO RON GO
the Convention
Could it be possible that they are intentionally creating such an even spread between all the candidates so that the winner will only be revealed at the convention?? By doing this:
1. the democratic nominee is known
2. the proven stance on where the American people stand on the war is revealed
3.enough time is given for "their" candidate to have either
(a) switched positions which is unlikely because that will look bad or
(b) enough time is given for "them " to switch to Ron Paul simply to win the white house.If by that time the fact that the American people want out of the war is proven, they will have no other choice but to support Ron Paul in order to win the white house.
(c) enough time to instigate some kind of horrific attack in order for the American people to support the war again
Just a thought...
Lisbon
I can see that in the precinct of Lisbon, votes for "others" counted 22.65% (77 votes), coming in second place. Dr. Paul got only 19 votes, or 5.59%. This is well worth a look.
http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/nhmap-popup.html
DONT REPLY TO THIS GUY
Mohomid has been a member for 1 hour.
Do not reply to this guy. This is an obvious attempt to rile up supporters.
Let this ridiculous comment be flagged and removed.
recount is the most
recount is the most important thing now
this is bigger than ron also this is ABOUT A free election
stop this now or never
/Mike
Front Fell Off
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcU4t6zRAKg
Recount?
You'll have to forgive me, but I'm just catching up on this. Where is there solid proof that there has been any voter fraud in New Hampshire? This is only the second state, and there's already claims of voter fraud. Just like to get the FACTS straight. Thanks.
IVotedForRonPaul.com
IVotedForRonPaul.com is a registry of all who voted for our man. Everyone who votes in the primary should also register here.
NH MEET UPS WHAT YOU DO? IT'S YOUR STATE!!!!!!!!!!
TELL US WHAT YOU DO WITH THIS FRAUD???????????/////
We Must Do Something!
Listen, I love Ron Paul! However, I feel that if his campaign does nothing about this OBVIOUS fraud then they are letting us down. My reasoning is this...We are out every time we get a chance bustin' our @sses to get him elected, but what for? If we are going to be cheated, what is the point? Honestly. He needs to realize that it's not about the number of votes it is about the PRINCIPLE of the whole thing. Put your place in the evil doer's shoes. "Oooh, they knew we fucked with the vote and still did nothing. We got 'em now." Then they continue to rig the further elections. If he does not stand up now, I truly feel that all hope is lost. He has to let them know that it will not be stood for. He has an excellent reason to do something; HELL, two counties that were reporting ZERO votes had 31 and 25 respectively. If they did it to those two, who is to say that they didn't do it all the way up line with some algorithm. I am a computer programmer and I know how this shit works. BUT, that is beside the point. That would be a bonus. The real deal is to let them know that this is a revolution!! In the revolution, they took turns returning vollies. THIS IS OUR VOLLEY! Period! If it is about the money, who cares, we can raise him more money! Dr. Paul, please do something. These people are mocking you and laughing at you and now they are cheating you! Don't stand for it. It is NOT human error! 1 to 5 votes misplaced may be human error, but not 31 and 25. Please, order a recount! Thank you!
Precinct Leader
I just signed up to be a Precinct Leader.
Reply if you are also a precinct leader or sign up at https://voters.ronpaul2008.com/grassroots/ and then reply
If everyone of the people who voted for Ron Paul so far brought just one more person, imagine what our numbers would look like?
What you can do to help...
Here's how you help:
STOP THINKING ABOUT A RECOUNT. Ron Paul is almost 10,000 votes from getting a delegate, so a recount isn't going to help. It's good to be right, but it's better to be effective, and a recount will simply not be effective. It also won't uncover some grand conspiracy, so people who are doing this for moral reasons are going to gain nothing. Maybe they'll find 100 votes for Ron. Whoopdie frickin' do. Let's spend our time and effort on winning delegates in future states. If I'm not mistaken, Nevada, where RP is immensely popular, is about to have a primary. Let's send our time and effort there.
"Nathan Hale" why do you consistently argue against RP?
I've gone through a lot of "Nathan Hale's" posts. He consistently tries to work against Dr. Paul.
No one would have as much free time as he spends campaigning AGAINST a single candidate unless they were getting paid for it.
He says things like:
"Ron Paul lost this one on his own... Ron Paul played a lot of bad angles and lost this one on his own."
We THOUGHT
RP was popular in NH too!
YOU STOP SAY THIS HERE-SPY!!!!
RECOUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Nathan Hale........you sir are a FRAUD!!!!
You're no Ron Paul supporter. In fact i hope people pay attention to his post. This is the very reason Ron Paul should go after a recount. They've already found 56 votes with no investigation. Do you think they would risk deleting Ron Paul's for just 100 lousy votes? I don't think so. Who knows how much more they could find? Even the expert that studies this stuff says that there is more than likely much more to it. Ron Paul was IMMENSELY popular in NH and look what that got him. We've had 500 volunteers there for a month!!! This is complete and total BS. Do you think they could run stories on MSNBC and CNN about Ron Paul hanging it up if he had finished 3rd????? I don't think so. And, if this happened here in NH, wanna bet that it didn't happen in IOWA too? He probably should have gotten 3rd there too. ahhh but Mr. Nathan Hale wants us to move our attention to Nevada where the same crap is going to happen. Hey Nathan? Fu$k You!!!!!
baubaublacksheep
Right on
Good for you
Do both.
INVESTIGATE!
government of the people, by the people, for the people
---
It seems like if they could
It seems like if they could pick a few districts at random and hand count those to see if there are significant differences, and if there are, then do a full recount. That should be far less painful.
Let's get a 2nd NH town to organize now!
Ok we have Sutton but has anyone somewhere else started a public campaign to round up all who voted for Ron Paul to get a real count today or within the next 24 hours (place an ad, posters on all the streets, etc) to get the best number which cant be too difficult in a small town, then compare to the reported totals. Systematically we can get everyones attention. Just what the Clinton's & McCain thought you were to stupid to do in the first place..
Stratford, NH - best example
We should focus on Stratford, NH.
Apparently this location used electronic voting but it has a low rate for Paul and Obama. 4% (3-votes) and 26% for Obama who is also considering a recount.
If all the hand counted balleted towns were all over 10% we need to start somewhere. Chances are we will find the fraud here.
watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8xgWjFe1cE
Looks
Looks like the columns were just off... They fixed it and the numbers match up now
There's no MIGHT about it.
It was going to happen. They have done this early on to distract us from canvassing and supporting our candidate... it's genius.
Not only that, it's literally impossible for Ron to get 10% in IOWA and way less in New Hampshire?? Come on! that's not possible.
-----
A great empire, like a great cake, is most easily diminished at the edges. - Ben Franklin
Not way less.
Iowa actually has a much higher population than New Hampshire, 2.9 million versus 1.3 million.
And we got 11.8 thousand in iowa and 18.2 thousand in New Hampshire
That means we got .4 percent of the population in Iowa and and got 1.4 percent of the population in New Hampshire, just the New Hampshire turnout was HUGE.
not to mention
the fact that they were trying to point out "human" error to defeat the attempts in the 50 states to go to paper ballot!!
yeah im getting sick of ron paul supporters. and im one of them.
argh.
ron paul 2008
--------------
if you build it he will come..........Ron Paul 2012.
digg http://digg.com/autos/First_Genuine_Chevy_Volt_to_be_Complet...
It isn't just RP supporters
It isn't just RP supporters it is all of us. Somehow we think if we complain about something we have done enough. I know the 31 voters in Sutton have reported it to the atty. gen., and they should be sure their votes count. They did find them and they probably got turned in. A giant recount would not have shown these votes because they never got turned in at all. Hopefully, and probably, the RP supporters in NH are making sure their own votes got counted.
RECOUNT!!!!!!!!!1
RECOUNT!!!!!!