42 votes

There is a viper in the Ron Paul Campaign? Meet Trygve Olson Ron Paul 2012 Chief Strategic Advisor works for the enemy.

Read it before you downvote it. I have no intention on stirring up drama for Ron Paul or his campaign frankly, but this information must be known by all of us - now. You may be blown away by what you are about to read. I was.

Full article here: Excerpt from the article below:Who is Trygve Olson? A former official of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a tax-funded "regime-change" operation under the rubric of the National Endowment for Democracy, Olson was involved in several of the "color revolutions" that swept Eastern Europe and the central Asian former Soviet republics during the Bush years. This New York Times article reports on his activities in Belarus meddling in their internal politics and plotting to overthrow its thuggish President, Alexander Lukashenko: he also played a part in stirring up similar trouble on Washington’s behalf in Serbia and Poland.

"The Romney-Paul alliance is more than a curious connection. It is a strategic partnership: for Paul, an opportunity to gain a seat at the table if his long-shot bid for the presidency fails; for Romney, a chance to gain support from one of the most vibrant subgroups within the Republican Party."

So what’s this "strategic partnership" based on? Certainly on nothing Paul has ever said or done – but the people around him are a different matter, and here’s where it gets interesting. After citing various anonymous "senior GOP aides" who advise against alienating either Paul or the Paulians, we are given the following inside information:

"Romney’s aides are ‘quietly in touch with Ron Paul,’ according to a Republican adviser who is in contact with the Romney campaign and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss its internal thinking. The two campaigns have coordinated on minor things, the adviser said — even small details, such as staggering the timing of each candidate’s appearance on television the night of the New Hampshire primary for maximum effect."

Yes, well, so what? That’s hardly a "strategic partnership": if anything, it’s a tactical convenience that has nothing to do with any policy or real political issues. On this front, Romney has little or nothing to offer Paul, but that doesn’t stop wily old Satan from taking Jesus up to the mountain, and offering him the following:

"’Ron Paul wants a presence at the convention,’ the [GOP] adviser said — and Romney, if he is the nominee, would grant it.

"What Paul and his supporters would demand, and what Romney would offer, are subjects of some speculation. One Paul adviser, speaking on the condition of anonymity to talk freely, said prime-time speaking slots for Paul and his son Rand, the junior senator from Kentucky, are obvious goals. On the policy front, Ron Paul’s priorities are reforming the Federal Reserve and reducing federal spending. So promises to audit the Fed and to tackle deficit reduction seriously could appease the congressman and his supporters, the adviser said.

"Less likely are concessions on foreign policy, where Paul’s non-interventionist stand is at odds with that of Romney and most other Republicans."

So here is the bargain: give up this non-interventionist foreign policy stuff and we’ll let you speak at the convention, maybe let your son speak – all in exchange for an endorsement of Romney. We may even pay lip service to some of your economic views: maybe we’ll set up a Gold Commission, as was done some years ago under Reagan. Just shut up about foreign policy.

It isn’t going to happen: unless it’s a wide-open convention, Paul will not be given a speaking slot of any prominence, because he won’t endorse Romney. Period. But there are other ways to influence the candidate, who is after all conducting more of an educational and movement-building campaign within the GOP, as opposed to a conventional candidate-centered campaign. In the Paul camp, the focus is on the message, not the candidate – but there are ways to influence the manner in which that message reaches the general public.

Ron himself is incorruptible: indeed, he is far more radical on foreign policy than I ever expected him to be. When the subject is economics, he always brings it back to foreign policy, pointing out the indissoluble link between a free and growing economy and a peaceful foreign policy. He is constantly saying that if only we would get rid of the Empire, we could begin to reform our domestic entitlement programs and deal with all the problems we have right here at home.

They can’t influence Ron – but they can influence his organization. Gardner reports that after Ron’s son, Rand, won the Kentucky primary against an Establishment opponent, "Then, quite strangely, the establishment and the Pauls came together":

"At [Sen. Mitch] McConnell’s request, the National Republican Senatorial Committee sent an adviser to Kentucky to watch over Rand Paul’s general-election campaign — ‘to be the grown-up in the room,’ according to one Washington Republican who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk candidly.

"The adviser, Trygve Olson, developed a friendship with Rand Paul, and the two realized that they could teach each other a lot — to the benefit of both candidate and party. Olson showed Paul and his campaign establishment tactics: working with the news media, fine-tuning its message. And Paul showed Olson — and by extension, McConnell — how many people were drawn to the GOP by his message of fiscal responsibility…. And at Rand Paul’s suggestion, Olson joined his father’s presidential campaign this year, basically to do what he did for Rand: help bring the Paul constituency into the Republican coalition without threatening the party. It’s probably no small coincidence that the partnership helps Rand’s burgeoning political career, too."

Who is Trygve Olson? A former official of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a tax-funded "regime-change" operation under the rubric of the National Endowment for Democracy, Olson was involved in several of the "color revolutions" that swept Eastern Europe and the central Asian former Soviet republics during the Bush years. This New York Times article reports on his activities in Belarus meddling in their internal politics and plotting to overthrow its thuggish President, Alexander Lukashenko: he also played a part in stirring up similar trouble on Washington’s behalf in Serbia and Poland.

At a meeting of the New Atlantic Initiative, another semi-official interventionist outfit, in 2004, Olson appeared on the same podium as various government apparatchiks of the old Cold Warrior/Radio Free Europe type, who gave seminars on the ins-and-outs of successful "regime change." While others gave talks on Lukashenko’s "links" to Saddam Hussein and Israel’s other enemies in the region, Olson gave a presentation on polling results in the country. A particular area of concern was the possibility of an economic or political union with Russia, which was seen by the participants as the main threat to "democracy" and Europeanization in Belarus. And while meddling in Eastern Europe appears to be his specialty – his wife, Erika Veberyte, served as chief foreign policy advisor to the Speaker of the Lithuanian parliament – this biography on the web site of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University says:

"Mr. Olson has helped advise political parties and candidates in numerous countries throughout the world including nearly all of Central and Eastern Europe, Indonesia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Venezuela, and Serbia."

The "color revolutions" of the Bush era were brazen attempts to overthrow regimes deemed unfriendly to the US, and absorb the scattered pieces of the former Soviet Union into the Western sphere of influence. Of course, these efforts all backfired: in Georgia, for one example, our chosen candidate set up a veritable dictatorship, jailed his opponents for "treason," and launched a disastrous war against Russia. In Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan, too, our sock puppets set themselves up for a backlash: both US-installed regimes have since been ousted, either by being unceremoniously voted out of office or by force. In Venezuela, the US government has long sought to overthrow the blustering caudillo, Hugo Chavez, and our meddling has only played into his hands, enabling him to muster nationalist resentment against the democratic opposition. The same is generally true elsewhere. These "strategic" deployments of "soft power" never work, and wind up hurting our interests rather than advancing them.

Another aspect of these "soft power" deployments is the inevitable involvement of the American intelligence community in some form or other, engaging in covert operations with no real congressional oversight and without the knowledge or consent of the American people. This can lead to all kinds of abuses that inevitably impact on our domestic politics – an area where the CIA is supposedly forbidden from entering, although that has never been the case.

In the New York Times piece on the Belarussian operation, the reporter describes a meeting attended by Olson and Belarussian dissidents as "a meeting of the freedom industry," a telling description because that’s exactly what it is: an industry, one in which Olson is a player. It’s the "regime change" industry that has flourished in this country ever since the start of the cold war. The necons played a key role in staffing the organizations and semi-official front groups into which billions of our tax dollar flowed: Reagan gave the National Endowment for Democracy to them as a sort of playground, where they were out of the way and free to think they had some real influence on the administration. In the post-cold war world, the NED took on added importance – and more tax dollars – as the US tried to cash in on the Soviet collapse by sponsoring "color revolutions" throughout the former Soviet bloc. It didn’t matter that the very reason for launching these cold war institutions was no longer in existence: as one needn’t explain to a Ron Paul supporter, government programs have a life of their own, and killing them is akin to driving a stake through the heart of a vampire – a difficult and often impossible feat.

So we have a major player in the "regime change" industry as a "senior advisor" to the Paul campaign: and not only that but a pedagogical relationship between Olson and Rand Paul. The latter has presumably learned from the former why draconian sanctions on Iran – deemed an "act of war" by his father – are a good idea and ought to be supported. Paul recently joined ninety-nine other similarly clueless US Senators in voting "aye" on what is in effect an economic blockade against Iran.

The Establishment’s strategy is clear: get to the father through the son, whose political career can be imperiled by the GOP elders, like McConnell (although that didn’t stop Paul from getting elected over McConnel’s opposition). If the Paul campaign is "infiltrating" the GOP, as Gardner puts it, then the GOP Establishment is intent on infiltrating the Paul campaign at the highest levels.

So if you wondered why the official Paul for President campaign ads devote almost no time to foreign policy issues, then perhaps now you have your answer. Of course, that hasn’t stopped several independent political action committees from making strong anti-interventionist statements on Paul’s behalf: but still, that this end run is even necessary raises all sorts of questions, one of which is surely the exact nature of Olson’s role.

The libertarian movement has been through this sort of thing before. Back in 1980, the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate, Ed Clark, and his handlers at the Cato Institute, tried to pass off libertarianism as "low tax liberalism." The scheme failed miserably: as Murray Rothbard put it at the time: "They sold their souls for a mess of pottage, and then didn’t even get the pottage!" A similar effort to sell libertarianism as a marginally less belligerent version of conservatism isn’t going to do much better – and certainly Paul himself would have nothing to do with such an effort. As we all know, however, Paul isn’t a hands-on manager: he tends to trust people to carry out his wishes. That hands-off tendency has gotten him in trouble before.

The GOP Establishment fears – and, yes, hates – Ron Paul, and they have good reason to feel that way. It is hardly beyond comprehension that they would attempt to influence – and, ultimately, derail – the campaign and the movement it represents in this covert manner. I don’t think they are stupid enough to believe they can somehow finagle Paul into endorsing Romney, or whoever the GOP candidate might be: what they rightly fear, however, is that the Paul campaign will not end in Tampa – that Paul will launch a third party bid.

That’s what this wheeling and dealing, these shadowy movements in the background, are all about. Whether they will succeed remains to be seen. The signs, however, are not good. Gardner cites Jesse Benton, Paul’s campaign manager, as saying:

"You can dress in black and stand on the hill and smash the state and influence nobody, or you can realize the dynamics and the environment and get involved in the most pragmatic way to win minds and win votes and influence change. That’s what we’re trying to do."

This is the classic argument for a sell out. The irony is that there is nothing pragmatic about it. The American people stand shoulder to shoulder with Ron when it comes to foreign policy, as every poll has shown. The question is whom do the Paulians want to "influence" – the American people, or the very Establishment they’ve been fighting all these years? The alternative to standing on a hill and making a fashion statement isn’t selling out libertarianism’s anti-imperialist heritage: it’s making that heritage understandable and attractive to the American majority, which is already with us in spirit.


The plan, apparently, is to push Rand Paul for the Vice Presidential nomination. These people are deluding themselves – but, then again, that’s how the sell out starts.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Proof McConnell sabotaged Dr.Pauls campaign and Jesse is getting

his payback now. You'll reap what you have sown Jesse.

Read the OPs article above.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Truth and only Truth

This statement is a contradiction in itself. In the libertarian movement speaking the Truth from ones heart and consiousness wins people by the thousands. We are like butterflies coming to the light, cause that is what truthfull facts are: rays of pure light.

"The most pragmatic way" stinks, it gives a certain foul taste in the mouth. And will sent everybody in the libertarian movement moving away from you.

""You can dress in black and stand on the hill and smash the state and influence nobody, or you can realize the dynamics and the environment and get involved in the most pragmatic way to win minds and win votes and influence change. That’s what we’re trying to do." "

"And remember, a half-truth is far more dangerous then a complete lie, because the complete lie is going to be discovered sooner or later - just a little intelligence is needed. But the half-truth is very dangerous, even intelligent people, very intellige

Exactly how bad WAS that frat at Baylor....?

...If Rand could meet a snake like this and immediately think "he can teach me a lot."


"Truth is an absolute defense to the charge of paranoia."

Well Ron did say that

He was going to run on the same platform as Bush did in 2000. Maybe he is also planning on filling his staff with former Bush staffers. I think Ron can do better. Fact is, If he ties himself to too much "Bush" it will definitely turn a lot of people off. Especially Independents, Blues, and the die hard supporters who remember all to well Bush and CO..I am starting to scratch my head as well..

"I have found that being rich is not about having the most but about needing the least"

I am generally supportive

of the people that Ron Paul selects as his staff, but I am suspicious of this Trygve Olson person because of his prior record.

Personally, I think that his job could have been accomplished by somebody with less "eyebrow-raising" credentials.
That was a risky move, to bring somebody like that into the mix.


Do you think?

That's like saying: "Maybe we shouldn't eat too much of this rat poison, it might not enhance our evening."

"Truth is an absolute defense to the charge of paranoia."

Many more than one viper

Last month, on August 23, Bruce Fein became Ron Paul’s Chief Legal Advisor.

In other words, Ron Paul became Bruce Fein’s Client.

I have written in length about Bruce Fein as a crusty Beltway Foreign Agent and his involvement and guilt in the recent scandal involving Congresswoman Jean Schmidt.

I’ve written extensively on this issue. Today I just want to list here some of Bruce Fein’s clients, and then ask you to consider and define the situation in terms of ‘interests.’ Here are a few well-known clients of Mr. Bruce Fein as exhibited by his lobbying firm:



A Few Clients from the Banking & Fed Megas Pool

Bank of America
Morgan Stanley
Standard Charter Bank

Oil Industry

Exxon Mobile
Chevron Texaco

Military Industrial Complex

General Electric

International-Imperialistic- Parasitic Organizations

World Bank
United Nations



Now Ron Paul is Bruce Fein’s client. The above predators are also Bruce Fein’s clients. So what are we talking about here?

A Gigantic Conflict of Interest?

Compatible Interests?


next post:

Final: The Facts, Bruce Fein, Ron Paul, and the Next Step

Today is Day 7 on the campaign to raise awareness and alert re Bruce Fein, the greatest threat to the Ron Paul Camp to date. It may be my last one depending on the public response and feedback we receive from the already active and vigilant ‘true’ Paul supporters. I am going to start with one last response to Bruce-Mattie Fein agents who have hijacked several websites to deflect attention from the facts and the real issues. If you go and read the propaganda written by the Feins’ agents you’ll see why I refer to them as ‘agents.’ Either due to certain omega fatty acid deficiencies or natural genetic misfortune, these guys slip and make clear their close associations with both Bruce and Mattie Fein. Now, allow me to provide you with a concrete rebuttal to some of this misinformation that is being spread and planted by Feins’ agents:

“So what if he is representing foreign agents, foreign governments or foreign groups. He is an attorney after all, and it is his job to represent these people?”

Last time I checked attorneys represented their clients in courts. Last time I checked legal cases were not brought by attorneys before the CIA. Last time I checked lawyers did not argue their clients’ cases before State Department operatives. And last time I checked legal representation did not extend to going to Congress, wining and dining representatives, and funneling money into their pockets. Did I miss something when I checked all this last time?! Because this is what Bruce Fein writes and markets about the services he provides for foreign agenda clients, and if you read you hardly, if ever, come across any mention of legal-attorney representation

snip snip

Just to show my generosity and kindness towards the IQ-challenged Fein agents I am going to recap: Bruce Fein is a foreign agent-lobbyist and that has nothing to do with ‘legal representation.’ He represents foreign agendas before the CIA, the State Department, the Congress, and the White House… Courts ain’t got nothing to do with this in-name-only ‘attorney.’ Where did you guys ever hear of cases being brought before the despicable Central Intelligence Agency-CIA?! What exactly are this Bruce Fein’s ties and close connections to the CIA and State Department he keeps bragging about?! Read more �



SophiaH asks: 'so WHO brought this israel firster on board the campaign ? '

Last week, right after publishing my article on Congresswoman Schmidt and Bruce Fein’s brilliant foreign lobby money rechanneling-laundering scheme, and to my shock, I found out about this:

The Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign announced today that constitutional and international law expert Bruce Fein will join the campaign as senior advisor on legal matters.

“Bruce Fein’s participation adds to our campaign’s already intellectual heft, enabling us to more broadly engage the conversation about constitutionality, civil liberties and the dangers to national security of an increasingly interventionist foreign policy,” said Ron Paul 2012 Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton.

MORE very interesting stuff here:



Pagans are tolerant by NATURE.

Brucie is Fein for FOREIGN LOYALTY but NOT for Ron Paul

.As Legal adviser to the Ron Paul Campaign brucies role has been for nearly a YEAR to guide the changes of focus of the campaign to be pro israel. . . Got it NOW Folks?

vipers from under every rock pushed into the Paul Realm and displacing HONESTY and HONOR as they always do.

Ron Paul lost his QUEST almost a year ago and the pus from the multitudes of bites is only now rising up to where we SEE it.

".. we jews are the destroyers...because we want a world of our OWN "...

Maurice Samuels:http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl736.htm

NOW how much can we salvage form his heroic journey seeking
to return our Nation to integrity ?

RE STRUCTURE and take control each in our OWN communities

We cannot look for a LEADER because NO leader can know every nook and cranny of such a huge movement
We have to vet every co worker in every action and create a network of double checked co workers then connect to a national base with personal vouchers for every worker BECAUSE
credentials are forged or accrued by the operation called 'sayanim' ( look THAT up !) in which people get credentials that can pass most all inspections so credentials are no judge of a persons HEART and SOUL.

This is tough stuff to grasp by we who wish to be accepting
and not be accused of anti- someism but you and I have to be Spiritually vigilant to our someism friends and move away from any who we see hold support israel or die views

Yes there ARE Americans of semi tic heritage who are as American as we but we cant trust to just accept all without very minute vetting and give up the FEAR of being called anti-someism while we find those honorable ones we CAN work with and who have much to contribute. These people have eraned this reputation for 3,000 years so we are NOT being anti anything by using the cautions we would with handling a deadly poison viper.

Personally I cant subscribe to the Balfour Declaration as I see it as illegal and that IMV makes israel illegal.
IMV it was done by the same sneaks who have infiltrated the campaign to set up ways to DESTROY any movement that would undermine the thousands of years of building their ownership of this world

read the WHOLE of the Maurice Samuels quote and be chilled by the real agenda of the usurper/destroyers

Lets restructure as tho our AVATAR were in a jail from where he can no longer speak TRUTH but sends us vibes to never give up and carry the TORCH he lit in our darkest days.

REMEMBER these transits dont end in a few days , they go on huge powered for YEARS and Venus/Pluto is the LIGHT,
Phosporus/Hesperus Lucifer Torch to light our way.

Keep your INNER TORCH lighted and always showing the way to keep Ron Pauls vision moving forward.

and thats my Sunday Sermon kindred.
Over any and all ideologies we stand UNITED holding up
that LIGHT.

Read on about another viper here:


Overt Neocon Ties & Covert Israel Pedigree

Ron Paul has been in staunch opposition and a counter to Neocon agendas and field players. Whether on the Israel lobby and agenda driving the hawkish currents in our nation today, or the corporate war machine interests guiding our foreign policy practices, Paul has consistently stood firm and unrelenting.

kristolMr. Fein’s public pedigree makes it fairly easy to spot his overt ties and links. For example: he has been an adjunct scholar with the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). By now I think the majority of Americans know about AEI’s claim to fame:

“AEI is the most prominent think tank associated with American neoconservatism, in both the domestic and international policy arenas.[10] Irving Kristol, widely considered a father of neoconservatism, is a senior fellow at AEI, and many prominent neoconservatives—including Jeane Kirkpatrick, Ben Wattenberg, and Joshua Muravchik—spent the bulk of their careers at AEI.”

A well-known couple of facts about AEI:

1- In order to be accepted by AEI, to become one of their scholars, proven neoconservative inklings and ties are the never-waivered prerequisites.

2- AEI seeks candidates who put Loyalty and Allegiance to Israel above all.

John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt state in their controversial bestseller, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, that the tone of the right-leaning component of the Israel lobby results from the influence of the leaders of the two top lobby groups: AIPAC, and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. They go on to list, as right-leaning think tanks associated with the lobby, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the American Enterprise Institute.

Acceptance to the tightly knitted and guarded AEI Neocon community also extends to family members and religious affiliations. Bruce Fein has passed both litmus tests in becoming a highly-regarded member of AEI. His wife, Mattie Fein, has been a vocal hawk, neocon propaganda distributor, and a very familiar face within the Beltway neocon community: Read more �



Pagans are tolerant by NATURE.

We Knew

The campaign workers should have tossed this guy's butt out.

Read this if you want to know who is behind 'color' revolutions... it's not constitutionalists that's for sure.


Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers

"color" revoultions and killers of R3volutions

Here I am posting MOST of an email still being cognizant of the %rule of text content. This activity if well known to many
utube viewers of political topics and the warnings have been out for a long while now but as these warnings are often tied to Revisionist History the old epithets are hurled to keep the warnings from being taken seriously.

Please get serious here, there ARE real vipers who work from the instant ANY grassroots action starts to gain steam, the Suffragette movement which became the Feminist Movement, the Tea Party Movement which became a theist movement, and a list of grass roots movements which are the masses starting to find common ground and ORGANIZE to get some VOICE in the daily verbiage about all issues involving us not guided by and focused on the benefits of the small self chozen group .

Read here what Lawson sent. He learned the hard way last year when his channel was removed and no cause given and a lengthy struggle with utube/gaggle to get it back only after getting GLOBAL support and since uploads carefully vetted vids so as not to "OFFEND' the perpetually "OFFENDED"

Once enough people recognize what the REAL vipers are and how they have crawled INTO every peoples movement for thousands of years and usurped from WITHIN we can learn to see it happening and STOP IT before it eats out the CORE of what would have
helped some mass group to stand up FREE again.

Remember those ones are paying agents provocateur to play
revolutionaries for the global media to claim those are rejecting the government of the nation those ones want to overthrow so the Global Management team chaired and financed by one GEORGE SOROS can remove any regime
they claim is about to harm America or is harming their own people or beating and raping little kids in public OH THE ANGST and LIES and EMOTION and THEATER to make Americans go along with sending more of our own BLOOD and TREASURE off to those lands to be targets for any material flying about mainly to create confusion and allow a small cadre in waiting to rush into the Leaders House and drag him out and beat him to death and stab him a thousand times as was done to Muammar Gaddafi
with NO trial and against most of the Libyans wishes.

These faked revolutions are de rigueur on the TYRANNYS path to NWO and any REAL R3VOLUTION that gets in their way will of course be INFILTRATED and taken down by STEALTH.

Y'all KNOW who those ones are so dont play ostrich in FEAR of being called 'anti sisms ' as that very epithet was created by those ones to shut up any dissent !

MANY people know a lot about FAKED photos and FAKED revolutions.

Here is some Anthonys email and his addy if anyone wants to see his channel or open a discussion with a tolerant and intelligent man.:


The recent disgraceful case of the BBC broadcasting a photograph alleging that it showed child victims of a Syrian Government massacre, but which was revealed, by none other than the person who took the original photograph, to have been a photograph taken in Iraq in 2003, leads me to think that the following article should be taken very seriously, indeed.


NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign

by Thierry Meyssan


Member States of NATO and the GCC are preparing a coup d’état and a sectarian genocide in Syria. If you want to prevent these crimes, you should act now: circulate this article on the Internet and alert your elected officials. In a few days, perhaps as early as Friday, June 15, at noon, the Syrians wanting to watch their national TV stations will see them replaced on their screens by TV programs created by the CIA. Studio-shot images will show massacres that are blamed on the Syrian Government, people demonstrating, ministers and generals resigning from their posts, President Al-Assad fleeing, the rebels gathering in the big city centers, and a new government installing itself in the presidential palace.

This operation of disinformation, directly managed from Washington by Ben Rhodes, the US deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, aims at demoralizing the Syrians in order to pave the way for a coup d’etat. NATO, discontent about the double veto of Russia and China, will thus succeed in conquering Syria without attacking the country illegally. Whichever judgment you might have formed on the actual events in Syria, a coup d’etat will end all hopes of democratization.

The Arab League has officially asked the satellite operators Arabsat and Nilesat to stop broadcasting Syrian media, either public or private (Syria TV, Al-Ekbariya, Ad-Dounia, Cham TV, etc.) A precedent already exists because the Arab League had managed to censure Libyan TV in order to keep the leaders of the Jamahiriya from communicating with their people. There is no Hertz network in Syria, where TV works exclusively with satellites. The cut, however, will not leave the screens black.

Actually, this public decision is only the tip of the iceberg. According to our information several international meetings were organized during the past week to coordinate the disinformation campaign. The first two were technical meetings, held in Doha (Qatar); the third was a political meeting and took place in Riyad (Saudi Arabia).

The first meeting assembled PSYOP officers, embedded in the satellite TV channels of Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, CNN, Fox, France 24, Future TV and MTV. It is known that since 1998, the officers of the US Army Psychological Operations Unit (PSYOP) have been incorporated in CNN. Since then this practice has been extended by NATO to other strategic media as well.

They fabricated false information in advance, on the basis of a “story-telling” script devised by Ben Rhodes’s team at the White House. A procedure of reciprocal validation was installed, with each media quoting the lies of the other media to render them plausible for TV spectators. The participants also decided not only to requisition the TV channels of the CIA for Syria and Lebanon (Barada, Future TV, MTV, Orient News, Syria Chaab, Syria Alghad) but also about 40 religious Wahhabi TV channels to call for confessional massacres to the cry of “Christians to Beyrouth, Alawites into the grave!.”

The second meeting was held for engineers and technicians to fabricate fictitious images, mixing one part in an outdoor studio, the other part with computer generated images. During the past weeks, studios in Saudi Arabia have been set up to build replicas of the two presidential palaces in Syria and the main squares of Damascus, Aleppo and Homs. Studios of this type already exist in Doha (Qatar), but they are not sufficient.

The third meeting was held by General James B. Smith, the US ambassador, a representative of the UK, prince Bandar Bin Sultan (whom former U.S. president George Bush named his adopted son so that the U.S. press called him “Bandar Bush”). In this meeting the media actions were coordinated with those of the Free "Syrian" Army, in which prince Bandar’s mercenaries play a decisive role.

The operation had been in the making for several months, but the U.S. National Security Council decided to accelerate the action after the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, notified the White House that he would oppose by all means, even by force, any illegal NATO military intervention in Syria.

The hampering of TV satellites for military purposes is not new. Under pressure from Israel, the USA and the EU blocked Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Libyan and Iranian TV channels, one after the other. However, no satellite channels from other parts of the world were censured.

The broadcast of false news is also not new, but four significant steps have been taken in the art of propaganda during the last decade.

• In 1994, a pop music station named “Free Radio of the Thousand Hills” (RTML) gave the signal for genocide in Rwanda with the cry, “Kill the cockroaches!”

• In 2001, NATO used the media to impose an interpretation of the 9/11 attacks and to justify its own aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq. At that time already, it was Ben Rhodes who had been commissioned by the Bush administration to concoct the Kean/Hamilton Commission report on the attacks.

• In 2002, the CIA used five TV channels (Televen, Globovision, ValeTV and CMT) to make the public in Venezuela believe that phantom demonstrators had captured the elected president, Hugo Chávez, forcing him to resign. In reality he was the victim of a military coup d’etat.

• In 2011, France 24 served as information ministry for the Libyan CNT, according to a signed contract. During the battle of Tripoli, NATO produced fake studio films, then transmitted them via Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya, showing phantom images of Libyan rebels on the central square of the capital city, while in reality they were still far away. As a consequence, the inhabitants of Tripoli were persuaded that the war was lost and gave up all resistance.

Nowadays the media do not only support a war, they produce it themselves.

Rest of Thierry's article:



Pagans are tolerant by NATURE.

Spanish Company Will “Count” American Votes Overseas In November


When the Spanish online voting company SCYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SCYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation.

As the largest election results reporting company in the US, SOE provides reports right down to the precinct level. But before going anywhere else, those election returns are routed to individual, company servers where the people who run them “…get ‘first look’ at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.” In short, “this redirects results …to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.”

And although the votes will be cast in hometown, American precincts on Election Day, with the Barcelona-based SCYTL taking charge of the process, they will be routed and counted overseas.

SCYTL itself is a leader in internet voting technology and in 2010 was involved in modernizing election systems for the midterm election in 14 American states.

But although SCYTL’s self-proclaimed reputation for security had won the company the Congressionally approved task of handling internet voting for American citizens and members of the military overseas, upon opening the system for use in the District of Columbia, the University of Michigan fight song “The Victors” was suddenly heard after the casting of each ballot. The system had been hacked by U of M computer teachers and students in response to a challenge by SCYTL that anyone who wished to do so, might try!

Nevertheless, in spite of warnings by experts across the nation, American soldiers overseas will once again vote via the internet in 2012. And because SCYTL will control the method of voting and—thanks to the purchase of SOE–the method of counting the votes as well, there “…will be no ballots, no physical evidence, no way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes…or the count.”

The American advocacy group Project Vote has concluded that SCYTL’s internet voting system is vulnerable to attack from the outside AND the inside, a situation which could result in “…an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters…” Talk about having a flair for understatement!

It has also been claimed that SCYTL CEO Pere Valles is a socialist who donated heavily to the 2008 Obama campaign and lived in Chicago during Obama’s time as Illinois State Senator. Unfortunately, given what is known about the character of Barack Obama, such rumors must be taken as serious threats to the integrity of the 2012 vote and the legitimate outcome of the election.

Though much has been written about the threat of nationwide voting by illegals in November, it is still true that most election fraud is an “inside” job. And there now exists a purely electronic voting service which uses no physical ballots to which an electronic count can be matched should questions arise. Add to this the fact that the same company will have “first count” on all votes made in 14 US states and hundreds of jurisdictions in 12 others, and the stage is set for election fraud on a scale unimaginable just a decade ago.

Perhaps Obama had reason for supreme confidence when he said “after my election” rather than “in case of” to Russian President Medvedev a week ago.


Did Benton hire her ?

If not who did ?

Thanks for the article !

"Freedom is a right that can never be won in war,only by each individual "

Serpents in the Garden (or the RP campaign).

Trygvie Olson is probably as bad as the above article alleges for the well being of our hero's Presidential campaign and the future of liberty, however the question still remains, for Paul (whether he wins the nomination or not) and for the rest of us...

Where do we go from here?

Trygvie Olson is like Murray Rothbard or Ayn Rand as far as adherence to principles is concerned compared to the Republicans who will unavoidably infest Paul's transition team should he be nominated, and even worse liars, frauds, crooks, and miscreants who will be surrounding him in the Oval Office. We have to be in a good position to continue spreading the message of peace, prosperity and liberty no matter how much Ron Paul, or any political jobholder of ours may be compromised. This means, at the very least, supporting them when they are correct, and strongly criticizing them when they are wrong. It means also educating ourselves and the general public of the problems associated with policies of the Trygvie Olsons (and perhaps the Rand Pauls) of the GOP, along with proomoting clear understanding of how our ways, undiluted by compromise or evasion, would be better!

Ron Paul CAN'T do this alone (and he shouldn't be asked to). The more influential our freedom movement becomes, the more help he (and others) will need from us to aid in its realization!


"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is not to be attacked successfully, it is to be defended badly". F. Bastiat

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, finally they attack you, and then you win"! Mohandas Gandhi

That one is also a TRAITOR.

Rand Paul Defends Romney Endorsement


3:36- 3:50

WHO was that adviser ? ?

That one is also a TRAITOR.

could it have been Olsen?


Pagans are tolerant by NATURE.

Listen ...

this has always been about the tail wagging the dog.

Paul being the tail and the establishment being the dog.

This is a very interesting article, and very informative if true ...

But ...

all it says is exactly what Ron Paul has been saying.

He wants to take over the Party and the Party is fighting like mad to stop him.

Whether this Olsen guy is a plant or a key asset to Paul's strategy is not clear. Agent? Double agent? Triple agent?

Who knows and who cares.

All I know is that Ron is very smart and very astute and his one goal is getting out his message. If that requires some hard decisions, Paul will make them without blinking.

God Bless.

It all makes for academic

It all makes for academic reading but the fact is...one li'l ole endorsement at the wrong time and place just took out both Pauls as a serious threat to the Republican Party. They were seriously duped and ill-advised to follow this course of action. They forgot why they were there.

I cannot seriously believe you just said that.

"They forgot why they were there."

Ron Paul has been fighting this battle for over 30 years and you think that "all of a sudden" he would just forget about why he is there?

You armchair quarterbacks are starting to make me sick.

take an aspirin and go to

take an aspirin and go to bed.

It is actually 41 years come August 15

Since Ron Paul decided to enter politics. That was the day that Richard Nixon shut the gold window.

He entered the House on April 3, 1976 after a special election as a replacement for Robert R. Casey the incumbent who had defeated him in the March 1974 Republican primary but was appointed to head up the Federal Maritime Commission by Gerald Ford.


Interesting details in there.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

So many possibilities.....

There are so many many possibilities, and sure some strange strategy that we don't understand might be at play here, but it just doesn't make sense. You don't quit in the 11th hour. You don't quit while we are winning the majority of delegates in certain states, and having a good shot at Texas and California. The delegate strategy was working and the revolution was gaining thousands of new people with each college campus he attended.

I think the article above is very interesting. In my opinion, "something" happened. It's too early to make deals. Not with Paul taking Romney delegates. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to conclude the very distinct possibility that severe threats to the family were delivered. The empire, although slightly weakened by the rebellion, is still very powerful.

The way I see it is, for those who have had the "awakening", you know we can't plug back into the matrix. The rebellion...the resistance.... the revolution must and will continue. You can rest assure, they are going to use a divide and conquer strategy and lean on the Paul's to get us aboard the GOP.

PS . Me and my buddy registered yesterday to become Florida Delegates and REC committeemen. Root 'em out from within!

This Could Have Been Prevented...

if Ron Paul supporters had demanded a coalition with peace progressives rather than insisting on total victory and absolute surrender on all sides. Coalitions are inevitable and if you choose not to decide to be in one you'll still have made the choice to be in the one that ruins your plans.

Catastrophic political failure.

Look forward to a big war stimulus because that's what's next, be it from Obama 2.0 or Romney 1.0.

I am all for a "coalition with peace progressives"

But let me ask you, where they ready for a coalition?

My limited experience with progressives, weather i wanted to go there or not, took me straight to the "racist newsletters" smear campaign from TNR. I spent all my time educating what is and is not racism. It appeared to me that progressives would never go for Paul because of these racist/homophobe/anti-semitic claims along with Pauls born-again stances and statement on evolution -- all this meant the cultural divide was too big for them to jump across, even if it innocents were slaughtered under Obama's drone wars...

Telling, very telling.

And if the roles where reversed, I like to believe that RP patriots would jump across the cultural divide and vote for a Progressive atheist, evolution believing, Politically Correct anti-war presidential candidate -- but I could easily be wrong about that.


Yes, please BUY this wonderful libertarian BOOK! We all must know the History of Freedom! Buy it today!

"The System of Liberty: Themes in the History of Classical Liberalism" ...by author George Smith --
Buy it Here: http://www.amazon.com/dp/05211820


I hate to admit it but you are right. I am a nobody so I failed to persuade any big name progressive to jump ship. I thought that fault was equal on both sides. Too much self righteous sectarianism all around. That along with political tribalism got us all a big fat zero and four more years of corporatism. Maybe next time...if there is one.

I think the first thing we all need to agree to is neither progressives nor libertarians separately have enough numbers to win and we should not expect a mass conversion in either direction before we get a chance to govern. If we can't acknowledge that political reality, we might as well forget about 2016 as well.

Here's an article by AFP's Michael Piper,

questioning if Rand is selling out Ron's 'America-First' foreign policy and getting in bed with the Zionists via Trygve Olson? http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4189
Here, is a video of Ray McGovern stating the Zionist state controls US government and MSM. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-SszJkjy60&feature=player_em...

I tried to warn people that Zionism was created by the same agents of the House of Rothschild, that created the Fed. One side destroys us economically, the other morally and spritually. Also, you have their Hollywood and Network brotheren working on the social moral front with all kinds of degrading shows and pictures. When are people going to open their eyes to the Empirical Facts???? If you are a Christian read Matthew 16:6 and Rev 2:9 and 3:9 to understand you have been warned and will be Judged!!!

How about a link?

That would be nice.

This is it


November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Great essay by Justin Riamondo

He lays it all out.

But I wonder, is Rand Paul "playing" the Pro-War elites and Christian Conservatives?

You know, when you read Seymour Hersh's book on JFK "The Dark Side of Camelot", you come away with the idea that JFK talked and steered pro-war right during his campaign against Nixon and first year presidency, but wanted to go anti-war in his second term.

From that book, I gathered that there are really 4 high positions of power that determines everything, and if those 4 are against you as President, you've got problems.


1) Secretary of Defense
2) Head of the CIA
3) Head of the FBI
4) Head of Joint Chiefs of Staff

And in JFK's situation, he could not fire the popular Edgar J Hoover. Hoover's wire taps on JFK and his parties with women turned is prudish stomach. Moreover, Hoover was on the take from the Mafia - he always went to the horse tracks with his long term friend and ALWAYS won -- Where was Hoover the day after JFK's assassination? Busy finding out if it was the Soviet spy who assassinated JKF? This certainly was on everyone's mind. No, Hoover too the day off and went to the race track collecting his winnings at the window. What better way to receive a payoff, tax free? Apparently, he bet on the right horses and won quiet a lot that day.

JFK's Secretary of Defense, he could not change again for political reasons. The Head of the CIA, he could not change. But it is clear, very clear, that JFK did go completely around the CIA, used outside channels (non CIA friends) to deliver the utmost top secret deals between himself and Soviets dictator Nikita Khrushchev. It has been reported that JFK planned to get out of Vietnam and break up the CIA in a thousand pieces during his 2nd term. Well, its clear to me the CIA broke up JFK into a thousand pieces.

When we look at President Obama, the first thing we can look at is his in ability, perhaps he did not even try, to change these top 4 posts. They were all hold overs from Bush and all approved War-Hawks.


1) Secretary of Defense
2) Head of the CIA
3) Head of the FBI
4) Head of Joint Chiefs of Staff

Indeed, it seems to me, that it matter NOT who the President is, if these 4 positions are not for changing a Policy, its not going to change.

We often hear about "the 3 equal branches of government". But as I have read and read and watched history unfold for 50 some years, it is apparent to me that what we have here is really a lock or coup upon the Presidency via these 4 positions of power. Now who grants these positions? The President does. But it is clear that to "be" president, these 4 actually do the presidential vetting. To get past these 4 men as a Presidential candidate, you must pay convincing homage to their policy goals and desires and PROVE to them that you are "going to lead the team" in the direction that THEY ALREADY WANT TO GO.

It reminds me of the delema that faced future Soviet "presidents". They were so vetted by the military and the Communist Party, how could someone like a Mikhail Gorbachev come up through the ranks, take the power, and then make the REAL CHANGES needed to end the empire? Well, somehow Mikhail Gorbachev did just that. More than Ronald Reagan or HW Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev is really the one who came up with ending the Cold War, pulled back the Soviet Empire and took down the "Iron Curtain".

The question is, what is Rand Paul up too?

I am inclined to wishful thinking....that he is up to something, but I suspect that he has always been a little right-wing republican warhawk and NEVER ever a libertarian or agreeing with his dad 'only up to a point', and so he is in perfect position to co-opt our movement. Overtures are to the Christian Conservatives and our support is just taken for granted. He may be right, politically speaking. Usually having the right name in politics is all you need to win.

Nevertheless, I want a Liberty Statesman, who calls a spade a spade, each and every time. No, I have no idea how a Liberty statesman can get past the "THE SPECIAL FOUR". One thing is interesting to note, the position of Dept of Homeland Security did not make it into the "Special Four". Janet Napolitano, Obama's one appointee that was clearly a left leaning Democrat, has had zero policy influence. Will that change? I don't know. The "SPECIAL FOUR" have had since 1960 to consolidate all their power with the banking interests and the rest of the DNC & GOP establishment One World Power apparatchiks.



Yes, please BUY this wonderful libertarian BOOK! We all must know the History of Freedom! Buy it today!

"The System of Liberty: Themes in the History of Classical Liberalism" ...by author George Smith --
Buy it Here: http://www.amazon.com/dp/05211820

SO much to comment on, but the main point is about a

colition with GOP/Romney/TRUMP/ROckefeller/Bilderberg/and essentially the same 'ol same 'ol verses the People and Ron Paul.

Ron Paul has NEVER sold out his people in Texas and he would not buy into any kind of a deal with a loser like the Romney operation such as the lying, cheating, robbing, murderous Bankers and Insurance frauds who think they own the "little people."

This is nothng but an attempt of the Old Dying Energy to undercut the New vibrant, yhouthful Energy which is, rightfully, taking over the reigns of the future. The old energy we can depict as like Cockroaches who run like hell when the LIGHTS come on. Let them know that the LIGHTS are ON Now...and they are not going to go off in this New Age of President Ron Paul.

fearless brave joyful peaceful loving grateful, compassionate

One Problem at NRC in Tampa

If Ron Paul does not win the nomination at the RNC, will not the Ron Paul delegates be forced to back Mitt Romney ? Last time around in 2008, Ron Paul handed his delegates over to Hucklebee. I guess they were trying to make a coalition against McCain. But everyone else has already handed over their lunch money to Romney. Is Rand Paul a delegate to the NRC ? So his lunch money has been taken away too. Did Hucklebee turn over all his delegates including the ones he got from Paul over to McCain ? For unity's sake will Ron Paul be forced to turn his delegates over to Romney ? I think if none of the Paul's are VP, then the Paul delegates should all walk out.

You forgot

a good can of lemon-scented RAID.

Tales of Vesperia - Resolution of the People ~ from 'Ring a Bell'