Video: Lt.Col. Karen Kwiatkowski interviewed on Local News, ahead of Tuesday's Election! VOTE Y'all!

my original 'sin,' "KwiatkoSWki"

vs.

The correct one: "KwiatkoWSki"

is technically 18%, not "half," right? lol! I kid, 'cause I love.

And you do realize that it was key press order reverse, and not an omission, right?

Well, Tom, can't help what you get angry about, but I assure you if you messed up my name, even in a headline as an honest oversight in a midnight typo?

Me?

Not gonna be: "seldom I get this angry..."

As, of all the things TO GET "angry" about in this world? Typo? Really not that high on my list. Policestate@HOME and illegal wars/occupation/murder/rape/torture/wars/children getting harmed@ABROAD while watching the innocent get beaten and murdered in both arenas? Sure.

But, a typo in a headline? Not so much.

Guess I just have a bit more tolerance before I "LET" someone piss me off. Then again, by then, limbs are flying.

But watching steadily growing amount of pettiness and useless, mindless, irrelevant inter-bickering and dickering over nothing at DailyPaul that I too feel oddly compelled to address despite the level of its silliness, which I too am participating in right now, right now?

Not angry, but sad as f*ck.

Tom, there are tact, and then there's 'tact.'

Meditation helps me tamper my angst, with a bit of Zen, and Ohm...

Should try it.oD

this is the kinda bullsh*t people believe when they don't research themselves:

"Mises was a Rockefeller foundation sock puppet."

Um, you do know that Mises was and is Dr. Paul's greatest intellectual heroes, right? And you do know that Dr. Paul often describes himself as a 'libertarian' with a small "l," right??

Guess that makes a libertarian/voluntaryist/self-taught Misesian Austrian economist like Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul an 'evil,' 'evil,' person, too.

THE ONLY one who has put forth this nonsense,

Mises was a Rockefeller foundation sock puppet.

is Mr. Worship at the altars of FDR, infrastructure statist 'progressive' authoritarian econ-imbecile schmuck extraordinaire, who's only still somewhat worthwhile to consider on geopolitical analyses: one Webster Griffin Tarpley, a commie socialist, in case you haven't figured out yet.

And it shows; when your 'source' is a single person and other bloggers who take Tarp's words as gospel and regurgitate it, making it seem like there's more than one person saying it, you're not really "read[ing] history," now are you?

And even IF Rockefeller did, that would be assuming Ron Paul is some puppet just because Peter Thiel the Bilderberg attendee donated millions to a RP SuperPAC.

KOCH Bros who fund the opposing faketarian Reason/CATO Beltarians once paid Murray N. Rothbard when he founded CATO and had been with them before falling out. Guess that too makes Rothbard, who was a close friend of Dr. Paul's and also another one of your dreaded libertarians who were Dr. Paul's other intellectual hero, 'evil' 'evil,' too. Suppose Dr. Paul, too, by proxy, by your 'logic.'

Besides, you have no idea how ironic you're being, as Karen IS a professed libertarian, a Misesian/Rothbardian one at that, who writes regularly FOR the Misesian/Rothbardian libertarian LewRockwell.com, who is only running as a "Constitutionalist Conservative Republican" because 'hey, I'm a Misesian/Rothbardian voluntaryist' is too difficult to parse to her otherwise statist district's constituency.

And regardless, as a veteran and someone running for the Federal office, her only Oath is to defend and uphold the Constitution FOR the United States of America against ALL enemies foreign and domestic. She quit the Pentagon BECAUSE she was willing to keep her oath. And now, she pledges to uphold the same oath as a federal official/public servant. That's the only thing that matters regardless of whether she is or isn't a 'libertarian' or no matter what you may or may not know about what a libertarian is.

Besides, the ONLY ones who equate Ayn Rand as an end-all & be-all to libertarians and libertarianism are liberals who've never read any of her works and delude that any and all exercise in 'intellectualism' begin and end with only indulging works of liberal authors, and those who assume that if someone reads one single author, that that person must be an adherent of that person's complete philosophy/ideology/principles, etc.

That would be akin to automatically assuming if you Kumar were to read the Communist Manifesto and/or Mein Kampf purely for the sake of opposition research, that you are a Hitler worshiping Nazi, or a Marx loving commie.

While many libertarians may start with Ayn Rand, they truly 'begin' with Rothbard.

Should really know what you're talking about before maligning people or authors whose works you're clearly not aware of or familiar with.

Seriously, anyone who regurgitates Webster Tarpley's empty jingoism on econ has as much credibility as Mutt WRONGney.

Mises was brilliant and well-studied. His books are a foundation for a lot of the beliefs espoused by Dr. Paul.

Everything doesn't have to be a conspiracy theory, and even if you don't like the motivations of those people you can still take parts of their work that you find useful and incorporate it into your philosophy.