54 votes

Updated:Lawyers For Ron Paul Civil Rights (Voting Rights) Lawsuit FAQ Video And Filed Court Documents

Updated 6/29/12 Interview with Richard Gilbert 3:13:25
http://www.toolsforjustice.com/audios/LFRP-PRCallJune-27-201...

Updated 6/13/12 with the current Lawsuit Filings

http://electionfraudremedy.com/

To view and download the entire 84-page federal civil voting fraud complaint filed in the U.S. 9th Circuit with the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California on Monday, June 11, 2012 by Attorney Richard Gilbert. The case has been assigned to Federal Judge Hon. David O. Carter.
Click here:
http://www.toolsforjustice.com/1_COMPLAINT_SACV-12-00927-DOC...

To view and download the 14-page Summons filed in the 9th Circuit on Monday, June 11, 2012 by Attorney Richard Gilbert as part of the Federal Civil Voting Fraud Complaint filed on behalf of disenfranchised delegates.
Click here:
http://www.toolsforjustice.com/3_CERTIFICATE_OF_INTERESTED_P...

To view and download the 1-page Certificate Of Interested Parties filed in the 9th Circuit on Monday, June 11, 2012 by Attorney Richard Gilbert as part of the Federal Civil Voting Fraud Complaint filed on behalf of disenfranchised delegates.
Click here:
http://www.toolsforjustice.com/3_CERTIFICATE_OF_INTERESTED_P...

To view and download the 1-page Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge for Discovery filed in the 9th Circuit on Monday, June 11, 2012 by Attorney Richard Gilbert as part of the Federal Civil Voting Fraud Complaint filed on behalf of disenfranchised delegates.
Click here:
http://www.toolsforjustice.com/4_NOTICE_OF_ASSIGNMENT_SACV-1...

To view and download the 2-page Notice of Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program filed in the 9th Circuit on Monday, June 11, 2012 by Attorney Richard Gilbert as part of the Federal Civil Voting Fraud Complaint filed on behalf of disenfranchised delegates.
Click here:
http://www.toolsforjustice.com/5_NOTICE_TO_PARTIES_OF_COURT-...

Updated 6/12/12: The lawsuit was filed Mon. June 11th 2012 in the 9th Circuit Federal Court in Santa Ana,CA Case# is SACV 12- 00927
The Federal Clerk, after exhaustive review of complicated legal documents involving hundreds of plaintiffs and defendants, has determined that all of Plaintiffs' documents were in proper form and has accepted the case for filing.

Paul grassroots group files civil suit against GOP
http://www.examiner.com/article/paul-grassroots-group-files-...

Lawyers For Ron Paul Civil Rights (Voting Rights) Lawsuit FAQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPt2nlyfmfc

This video explains a basic overview of the Civil Rights (Voting Rights/Election Fraud) Lawsuit being filed in Federal Court by Lawyers For Ron Paul on behalf of American voters.

Here is the Lawsuit FAQ in PDF format.

http://www.toolsforjustice.com/LFRP_LAWSUIT_FAQ.v.6.6.10.201...

Update 7/30/12

Richard Gilberts response to Motion To Dismiss
http://electionfraudremedy.com/OPPOSITION_TO_MOTION_TO_DISMI...

8/8/12 3rd Filing
http://www.facebook.com/download/374875655918347/lawsuit2.pdf



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I think anyone that reads the 84 page filing in the OP above

will see that it is apparent that this is a slam-dunk Dr K.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

reedr3v's picture

Excellent, thank you

.

this needs

this needs more publicity
this needs more publicity
this needs more publicity
this needs more publicity
this needs more publicity

get this to kokesh

http://tinyurl.com/cfkwfwg

in kokesh's words "mitt motherfucking romney"

haha

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

Thank you, Lawyers for Ron Paul

:)

Lots of good info here. Mods,

Lots of good info here. Mods, any way we can get this on the front page so its easy to find? Please?

Blessings )o(

Let's do this!

This lawsuit is the game-changer that will turn both conventions around and get us back to saving our Constitutional Republic!!! This is the only way that Ron Paul has a chance to win this. If you don't understand that, then you need to research more and understand what is happening.

Please spread the word to any delegates/alternates you know going to Tampa. Have them sign up at the website or go to the FB page of Lawyers for Ron Paul.

Let's "Get 'Er Done!".................

Judy Spady

Front page? The most important voting related lawsuit in 30

years has been filed with the goal of making the RNC follow federal law and it falls off active forum topics when commented on?

I've never seriously asked for anyone to vote up any of my post's but I'm asking for to you now.

Vote this up if and comment if you want to see this front paged please.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Wow we love you Mr. Gilbert, the ambulance-chasing attorney

whose “accomplishments” for Ron Paul include attempting to convince supporters of the presidential candidate that he “cannot win the nomination” unless all naïve delegates to the RNC become listed as plaintiffs to a “lawsuit” against their own party before the Committee on Credentials even meets.
Tell me, Mr. Gilbert, what part of the following do you feel unfairly represents your ability as an attorney (or to tell the truth, for that matter!)?

... It seems as if plaintiffs’ attorney, Richard C Gilbert, flipped through several civil rights suits and copy/pasted any constitutional-sounding rights/clauses that he could find: equal protection, due process, full faith and credit, “right to privacy”, 9th amendment “right of reservation of all rights not enumerated to the people”, right to travel, and right to free speech. I’m surprised he didn’t add the establishment clause and the right to dream in color. Mr. Gilbert also pays homage to “Vice President Cheney” by including a quote from the former VP: “Freedom means freedom for everyone.” Well, now, isn’t that nice. Mr. Gilbert also seems to have a stutter when typing as fully three paragraphs on p7 of the complaint are identical. Finally, Mr. Gilbert asks for “Costs, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees.” Obviously, Mr. Gilbert is not quite the Juridical Rock Star that Mr. Olson and Mr. Boies are. Indeed, he doesn’t even know where to file his suit as the United States had to remove the suit from Orange County Superior Court to the Southern Division of the California Central District Court.

I mentioned that I thought the plaintiffs were paying for this themselves and here’s why: On Mr. Gilbert’s website, he boasts that his “fees are half what other firms charge.” I suppose this is a good thing if he actually manages to win and the taxpayers have to pay his “costs” but does one really want a “discount lawyer” arguing constitutional law and civil rights issues? It seems that this Orange County couple lost their asses in the financial market since the complaint bears a “fee waiver pending” notation. Perhaps he charged his clients the filing fee but is choosing to keep it for himself by asking for a waiver. I do hope that the plaintiffs are receiving a discount for each typo that is present in the complaint as there are many.

So we know that Mr. Gilbert produces a less than stellar product and that his clients are either poor or getting ripped off BUT let’s talk about the firm. Mr. Gilbert appears to be a partner at Santa Anna[sic]‘s “Gilbert & Marlowe, we’re a different kind of law firm.” Well, yes, you are! Gilbert’s “skilled Orange County attorneys have more than 100 years of combined experience, including working on numerous precedent-setting cases in family law, same-sex marriage, medical marijuana usage, and others.” All two of them listed in the attorney profiles?!? Moreover, Gilberts’ attorneys have been “NAMED ‘BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA’ by Harvard Law School Graduates.” I’m glad to know though that “money shouldn’t stand in the way of getting the help you need.*” (“*Conditions do apply”)

And how about Mr. Gilbert, the man? He’s a real peach born way back in 1951 in NY, NY! Mr. Gilbert’s practice is limited to “100%” litigation in the areas of “Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Custody & Visitation, Family Law, Personal Injury — Defense, Personal Injury — Plaintiff [and] Toxic Torts.” Mr. Gilbert received his degree from “Western State University College of Law” in Fullerton, California way back in 1977 and was admitted to the CA bar in 1979 (SBN 85912). Is it just me or does it seem that Mr. Gilbert might have had to sit the bar exam more than once? Mr. Gilbert also lists education at Whittier College School of Law, Los Angeles, California but doesn’t describe what or when he might have studied there. You might have noticed my emphasis on “way back” and thought, “What is the Rascal doing?”

Well, I checked the Internet Archive Wayback Machine to see how Mr. Gilbert’s website might have changed over the years and to see if I could glean anything further about him. The most recent page archive listed was May 2006: Interestingly, I noted the following differences 1) between 2006 and 2009, the firms “collective experience” grew from “90″ to “more than 100 years.” 2) between 2006 and 2009, “constitutional law” moved up in prominence in Mr. Gilbert’s practice areas 3) in Dec 2004, Mr. Gilbert listed his education as “Harvard Law School (PIL)” but that is no longer listed in 2009…hmmm. Let’s look at that a little more closely. Quick! Google. It seems “PIL” indicates he may have attended the “Program for Instruction of Lawyers” 4) Waaayyyyybaaack, as far as the wayback machine goes in this case. Jul 2003. A very quickly scrolling, somewhat nauseating, line of text tells me that Gilbert and Marlowe have been criminal defense and family law “attorneys for 24 years”, which jives with graduating in 1979 as both he and his partner, Diana Marlowe, did. Hmmmm….6 years further down the road to 2009 and suddenly we move from 48 years (24 each) to “more than 100 years.” Doesn’t 48 +12=60? Must have been that light speed scrolling text that altered time.

Well, enough with the discrepancies already. I’ve proved to myself that Mr. Gilbert misrepresents both his education and experience. In addition, he likely overestimates his areas of competency. Just because you CAN practice constitutional law in the area of same-sex marriage doesn’t mean you SHOULD! I’m certain that ambulance chasing is great for Personal Injury suits, but I think Mr. Gilbert should leave suits like Smelt to the good Ol-Boies.

Nice Research!

And although I don't particularly have great faith in this guy Richard, and have been anticipating his "fingers in the cookie-jar",
as evidenced in your post, I do pray for three things.
#1: He gets lucky...and wins
#2: The delegates are not harmed,or deemed to be invalid.
#3: The Court Calendar will schedule trial in time for RNC-Tampa.

Wish/Prayer#3 is especially relevant as I have experienced personally the slow-moving "wheels-of-justice", and this is especially a realistic,pragmatic concern regarding this case.

And the "Pro Bono" allegation repeatedly made has been utterly debunked:
“Costs, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees.”
Nice work Ninja!

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

YOU DO IT.

You convinced me. You take over that case.

Hic Rhodus hic salta.

still waiting to see that certified document.

.

Here are all the certified court documents in the case this far

Added to the OP above for all to read : )

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

GoodSamaritan's picture

Yes, it's really important that

all Ron Paul delegates give up their identifying information so that the RNC and Romney campaign will know exactly who you are as soon as possible.

As I have asked in one or two of the countless other threads on this topic without receiving an answer, what is the guarantee that only good can come of revealing delegate identities before the convention?

And another question: since there's no way any court could act in time to protect our delegates from retaliation, why is it claimed in the video that there is no danger to exposing them since they're protected by "litigation privileges" (which simply means that statements made during the litigation are non-actionable)?

I'll add this from the Texas State Organizer for the Paul Campaign:

http://www.dailypaul.com/239122/important-from-paul-campaign...

Ron Paul - Honorary Founding Father

Already filed

http://www.examiner.com/article/lawyers-for-ron-paul-files-c...

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

GoodSamaritan's picture

Ambiguous

The article isn't perfectly clear whether the suit has been filed, is being filed, or will be filed.

Ron Paul - Honorary Founding Father

Well I got the case number off of the attorneys

personal facebook page and he says it's filed.I doubt an attorney in good standing to practice not only in the circuit courts but is approved by the Supreme Court to bring cases to be heard there is going to bs about this since that is an extemely small percentage of attorneys that have that standing.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Great news.

Great news.

Watch the Vote 2012

www.electionfraudremedy.com

Document voting rights violations and election fraud abuses committed during the 2012 Republican primaries in our ToolsforJustice private forum.

Bump!

I think it mat help a lot with some skeptics.

That is true

but it will not help with the diehard operatives here that continually fight this without any basis in fact.They refuse to listen to the main attorney that repeatedly posted all of his contact information including phone email ect and instead resorted to baseless smears and were caught creating sock puppet accounts to defame him.

I did all the investigation I needed to day one when I became aware of this by making phone calls and using the the net and was satisfied and confident that this was going to be the best move and way to go next to stop the irrefutable fraud we are saddled with in our current nomination process.

All you have to do is watch the video or read the short pdf FAQ and you can see that this has the ability to completely change what happens at the RNC convention in Tampa in our favor.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

??

You mean Richard? He was always condescending and his answer's always ambiguous. Does he still mistakenly believe that someone made death threats to him, when in reality they where quoting Micheal Nystrom's spiritual analogy. The fact he could not work that out made him, to me, look stupid.

Plus the fact that they are always trying to get as much delegate info as possible, even trying to scare people by saying "This is the only chance for Ron to win in Tampa" BS etc, Like its all about you guys and this case, Seriously.

Which is WHY from the start that I beleived this was fishy and any deleagte planning on going to TAMPA stay the hell away. I still dont trust it, and thats my opinion.

So far Richard has not made a good impression with me.

DELEGATES DO NOT GIVE YOUR INFO TO ANY THIRD PARTIES.

Remember the Pro Bono (cough) Claim?

Here's a FACT:
Mr. Gilbert asks for “Costs, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees.”
Like lambs being led to the slaughter, God Help Them!

CAN:Somebody counter this with a FACT?...NOT an OPINION.
Please educate me...I wont "down-vote" your reply.
Or try to "bury it" in countless posts here.

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

WOW....

LOTS of ROMNEY Paid Trolls...( Zsh Ninja, Most likely is one)

YEAH! WOW!

Don't counter my argument with FACT.
Use the TROLL accusation...real cerebral on your part.
Alinsky never recommended arguing with facts..just accusations.
Your pattern was spotted ages ago pal.
PROVE or DISPROVE...the Money end of course.
I don't expect a relevant statement..just another side-track comment.

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

I HAVE OVER

200 hours in this case, DO YOU SEE ME ASKING FOR MONEY...NO!!! Neither is Richard, I will take it by the question and answer, and the following of a one "zsh ninja" that you have no inkling of what is involved in filing a case. The term, "All cost including legal fees" is involved in ANY case that is filed, if it were not, one would be leaving themselves open to a LOT of fees that are court required to file such cases. THIS "CLAUSE",,,enforces law that the losing party pay those fees, IF ANY, when they lose.

There, a reasonable answer, and if you do the research, as I AM NOT playing instructor here, I DO MY research, IT IS WHAT I DO...AND AM trained...TO DO. PLEASE, do some research on this "phrase"

That is a reasonable, truthful answer, BUT, I fully expect, that it will not be enough to satisfy. Those who continually question fact, refuse to do the research BEFORE they ask a question, AND have seemingly REFUSED, all other legitimate, honest answers, because they simply are not want they want to hear...will NEVER, be satisfied with an answer until they see it for themselvs, SO I EMPLORE YOU....RESEARCH IT!!...Thank you and have a nice day :)

That's IMplore NOT EMPLORE

Now I see WHY the MOTIONS FILED before the Court were so grievously.........
..............FLAWED !!..............

200 HOURS on THIS CASE....ALL YOUR TRAINING...I'm sooooo impressed!
Now get this:
BUY a DICTIONARY...GET SOME TRAINING in ENGLISH & SPELLING.

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Thank you Jerry

I am grateful for you efforts. To me, you and the legal team are heros, and I am sorry to be a witness to the undeserved attacks you have suffered on Daily Paul by some folks who appear to have come here and waited for a legal suit. In all my years here, I have never seen anything like it.

I do believe those attacking you KNOW very well what is involved in a case filing. I'm sure these attacks are designed to make the nieve doubt and fear the legal team.

The truth is, every delegate that you are helping, and a few here on Daily Paul, are deeply appreciative.

"stealth" reflects them and why they employ that term.

You are incorrect

Delegates can get any information they need from delegates for Ron Paul.com, where it says NOTHING about stealth, even though it is updated every day, with names, and links, unlike those anonymous attackers.

Too many people here, who are not republicans and not delegates are not checking facts that concern delegates.

Stealth delegates would be stealth by the campaign, not fearmongering general announcemnts from a organizer on Daily Paul.

Richard was attacked, and I was attacked for asking him questions, and that is why I DOUBT the doubters.

I can't ask questions without getting bashed?

Now ninja is back to charactor assassination of Richard and his firm.

Time is going to tell, and if I'm wrong, I'll be damned, that's how much a religious person like me thinks I'm not wrong on this.

And Danton taking Nystroms Buddha story, I can see where Richard would see that as a threat. Richard being new here, his BIG mistake was thinking he was going to come here and meet friendly people.

I still don't know if I like the entire concept of the law suit, but I do know I don't like how Richard, his firm and those who have come to help KNOWN delegates, which there are many OPEN delegates, have been treated.

Just vote for Paul!

IF he is a Lawyer and can not work out, after being told and lead to the Post about the Buddha, that it was NOT a threat whatsoever. Then that does not inspire much confidence in him as a Lawyer to me.

I asked him questions, and was not attacked, except by those who where blindly following him.

All I got was ambigious anwers and condescention. There is a valid reason's for Richard's QUESTIONING, and I suppose you could say VETTING, It was because He and his Cohorts have continuosly called for delegates to contact them. And then got all defensive, when people didnt simply trust him.

We are working within a world of corruption, people need to be trusted, and for that to happen they need to PROVE THEMSELVES, and explain in detail (without the condescending attitude and attacks) who they, what they beleive, what they want to do, and how they are going to do it.

Because of the way he acted and spoke, I still dont trust him, and thats MY OPINION.

I fear this will be used against us in some way.

JUST VOTE FOR RON PAUL!, Its your constitutional right! Let them TRY to take us to court after we elect Ron Paul.

EH???

"explain in detail (without the condescending attitude and attacks) who they, what they beleive, what they want to do, and how they are going to do it"

You mean the way we were asked politely or professionally? Or the way we were attacked with defamation, name calling, false information and fear mongering by a few here?

AND then, when the questions were answered, we are called "LIARS" "cohorts" "fraudulant" "conspirators" or "we are Phishing" DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN REALIZE...THAT A FULL LIST OF DELEGATES IS AVAILABLE ONLINE...THROUGH THEIR OWN PARTIES MEANS...We don't want a "List" of delegates...WE COULD CARE LESS...about knowing EVERY SINGLE DELEGATE...BUT...we DO CARE, that they have been abused, disenfranchised, harrassed and intimidated, BY BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE...NOT JUST ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER...EVEN BY CERTAIN R.P campaign officialsat the state levels.

THIS IS about the liberty movement and protecting what little freedoms we have left. I AM SORRY, that there are those here that are so hurt, paranoid and distrusting that they can never accept help for anything because they will NEVER trust anyone they don't drink coffee with everyday. BUT WE ARE THE REAL DEAL.

Wow...yeah? "without the condesending attitude and attacks"

Answers are not what is wanted here, and Vetting...is not done by slander, libel or defamation( yes I know the difference, but in law, if you care to research...they all are covered under the same law)that, is just being rude, arrogant and self serving. Not to mention, that rp4pres, one of "your own" in the little band of those who cannot accept a good thing when you see or hear it ( and in "cohorts" with zsh Ninja)was BUSTED, using FAKE accounts and posting AS RICHARD, to try and defame him, THAT IS FACT.

WE HAVE done our research, we are, professionals, and perhaps, this is why we do not come back with hateful, defamatory and inflammatory comments.

I have been a member here for 45 weeks, I have been busy doing my part to help the campaign,so forgive me when I take offense, at being slammed, trashed, and belittled, for doing MY PART in ensuring our rights, ARE NOT INFRINGED. YOU WOULD TOO. Or you can sit at your computer, and try your absolute best, at trying, to tear down any help, or any "outsider" that wants to help. Really, these post that are being designed to dessimate this case here, seem almost OCCULT like by design. Your either with the liberty movement or not, but either way, TEARING something apart, when you DO NOT have the facts, IN WHICH CASE, MAY BE NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS ANYWAY...IS NOT HELPING.

To all those who are supporting us, and are ACTUALLY finding out who we are THANK YOU!!!, at least, the ones that are supporting us here...HAVE TAKEN THE TIME TO ASK US...NOT ASSUME.