244 votes

Updated with Action Plan: Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched.

Could Ron Paul have gotten 72% of the vote instead of 12%? Anne Beckett, election judge for Austin (Travis County), says it is so.

In fact, (corrected) as part of her job she did a preference poll of Republican voters for their party affiliation. As a result of the interactions offered by the voters (not solicited) she says that a minimum of 66% of the voters were likely voters for Ron Paul. As they gave her their preference she wrote a line on her hand, then, counted the total voters. Some 2/3 of the voters, she believed, went for Paul, NOT Romney (she wishes to be conservative, but says that at the bare minimum 66%, not 12%, of the votes went to Paul).

For credibility it is important to note that she took a complete poll and was there from 6:00 a.m. until closing (12 hours). The precinct she judged was 247-R.

Here are the 'acclaimed' numbers from the election board:

http://www.co.travis.tx.us/county_clerk/election/20120529/fi...

Scroll down to pg. 456. The results she is disputing are as follows:

Live voters, May 29
Mitt Romney: 72
Ron Paul: 15

Early voting (absentee ballots)
Mitt Romney: 41
Ron Paul: 4

Don’t feel depressed about all that has happened. We have been severely cheated. Apparently, in this case the real numbers in the live voting are 72 or more for Paul and 15 or less for Romney.

Ms. Beckett states categorically that these numbers are false. In her words, it’s “completely false.”

UPDATE: She has noted another anomaly. There were over 155 Republican votes in her precinct, not 87, as listed above. One wonders how many other times were the number of Paul votes in Texas precincts simply purged by these vile computerized voting machines.

The judge has filed an affidavit with ElectionFraudRemedy.com.

Tune in to this epic show. Dr. K. will interview Ms. Beckett about her findings and will discuss the full strategy going forward for proving the fraud in other counties and states.

See also: http://www.dailypaul.com/238805/we-can-prove-vote-rigging-an...

Note: here are all the charts by our mathematicians on vote flipping: https://www.sugarsync.com/share/bzvpf3dyq5hre

BIG UPDATE: this Travis County chart is a must see, which confirms Ms. Beckett's findings. You'll see what a normal chart looks like versus one demonstrating flipping -

http://www.libertyusapac.org/wordpresspac/2012/06/11/217/

Note how Dr. Paul starts out at a higher vote count level than Romney, only to be suppressed with increasing vote counting.

Newest update: I now have the voter rolls for Travis County precinct 247 and other suspect counties. Any volunteers willing to help?

For a detailed charting of the rigging in Dr. Paul's own city and county see also:

http://www.dailypaul.com/240534/proof-of-cheating-in-brazori...

Previous update: See also this powerful anaylsis by one of our top experts in Riverside, County, CA, also breaking news:

http://www.libertyusapac.org/wordpresspac/2012/06/11/electio...

UPDATE: Tools needed to prove election rigging

This is a systematic plan to prove election rigging.

First, it is necessary to procure the voter roll of all registered voters in a given precinct. Then, it is needed to get the poll tapes from each precinct, that is the tape spat out at the end of voting by the machines.

It isn't necessary to get the whole tape. Just the end, where the total votes are listed or the total votes for each candidate.

The tools are as follows:

Tool #1: The Script:

Hello Ms./Mr. ___________. I’m __________ ____________ with the Ron Paul grassroots organizations Citizens for Honest Voting. We are conducting a grassroots exit poll to confirm the results of the recent election in your precinct. Would you possibly be a Ron Paul supporter or voter?

(If yes)...great, did you vote for Dr. Paul in the presidential election in precinct __________. (If yes) Great. We have reason to believe that the vote count in your precinct isn’t accurate. Just trying to confirm the vote as best as possible to keep our voting honest.

Would it be OK (Ms./Mr. ____) if I send you a special form for confirming the vote? Would it be possible to get your email (or send to the address)?

You can also confirm you vote on-line. Are you on the Internet (steer to www.ronpaulvotecount.org)?

Would it be OK to get some more information from you, so I can help you confirm your vote?

Would you also be willing to do an affidavit to confirm your vote? This way ALL Ron Paul votes will be recognized.

(Or, you can offer to send or email the form to them)

Answers to standard questions:

"My voting info is private." A- that is fully appreciated but you would like to see truly honest voting, wouldn't you? That's why we're doing this poll."

"What do you hope to accomplish with all this?" A- "just to make sure the voting is entirely accurate and honest. This is important for you and for the future of our country, wouldn't you agree?"

Note: then go through the After-Action Exit Poll and get all the voters’ information. Stress the importance of the affidavit, if they could do it. Tell them that this is powerful proof of the vote, the kind of proof needed to keep the voting honest. Keep track of all the voters and the vote total. Then, you’ll fill out an affidavit confirming the assessment.

Tool # 2: After-Action Exit Poll

This is the tool that must be filled out after contacting every Ron Paul voter. It provides an immediate proof of the vote count:

http://www.libertyusapac.org/wordpresspac/2012/06/08/after-a...

Tool #3: Final confirmation is through affidavits at www.ronpaulvotecount.org

http://www.ronpaulvotecount.org/voting/voting%20affidavit.pdf
http://www.ronpaulvotecount.org/witness/witness%20affidavit.pdf

The affidavit is procured, signed, notarized and then uploaded.

Grassroots is where it is!!!



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Republican red...

As in voter turnout that is predominately republican.

If these figures are accurate

If these figures are accurate then 6 or Ron's 48 votes in precinct 324 came from my street. I find that difficult to believe.

In 2008 ten people supposedly voted for Ron Paul in my precinct.

I know of 8 people who voted for him. That there where only 2 more, given the fact I delivered DVD's to the homes of Republican voters in my precinct, makes me think that perhaps they missed a few votes somewhere. Maybe I'm just wishful thinking.

Then, get your affidavits and upload them at:

www.ronpaulvotecount.org

All Travis County voters must certify their votes. The same with all voters in Liberty and Brazoria Counties.

Link to enlarged map of Ron

Link to enlarged map of Ron Paul's district for other counties where the vote should have been all Paul, and crumbs to Romney. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TX14_109.gif

Link to information and stats about Ron Paul's district, which encompasses 7 counties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas's_14th_congressional_district

RON PAUL 2012 * Restore America * Bring The Troops Home
http://www.texasuncensored.blogspot.com

whaddya mean?

whatddya mean "6 from your street?"

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

They will...

Just appeal the ruling so that the verdict will happen after the election takes place. It's good to expose this stuff, but it won't help this time around. And maybe not even the next unless the machines are gotten rid of.

It better help this time around!

There is not going to be a next time if they can help it.
They are turning lady Liberty on her head and stuffing it in the ground.

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

Effort by Romobams to get delegate information

Daily Paul has been overtaken by this group trying to get our information, telling us we have to sign up to the lawsuit

THIS is simply NOT TRUE.

I am a very strong Ron Paul supporter. I have dedicated this entire election season, beginning over a year ago, to the campaign. I've done this to the exclusion of many other interests.
I am the judge who watched the votes changed from what people TOLD ME to what we ended up with. According to the Travis County Election Board, he only received 15 votes in the precinct I worked, on that day, and i KNOW this was a lie.
If you do not act as part of this suit, please just do not act against it, as you are acting against OUR interests. I did not play to PROVE that they lie to us. I planned on proving how well Texas, and especially Austin, turned out for Dr Paul. And then, they LIED.

Please do not be like them.

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).

Wrong. We need to make believers out of these people

and put the fear of God into them. You don't want to go after Webster in Maine? No one gets off the hook. Let them find out that guardians of the ruepublic can move like a swarm of killer bees. And rule 38 - we know the rules.

Exit Polls Are Worthless

Many of us have been shouting this for years now. Don't waste liberty energy on exit polling. It is a waste. What did this prove? NOTHING. You have a hunch. I don't doubt that Ron Paul won but you cannot do anything with it. It has no legal value because there is no proof of how people vote unless you COUNT THE BALLOT.

Put our efforts into forcing the States and Counties into banning all computerized vote counts and do open and transparent vote counting by hand AT THE PRECINCT and reported from the same in front of witnesses and webcams.

I did not do an exit poll.

I worked the election as an official. People volunteered that they were voting for Ron Paul, and i made a notation each time. It's a bit different from an exit poll, as I did not ask even one person if he or she were voting for a particular candidate. They volunteered the info.
I hope you understand the difference.

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).

jeffreyliberty, I think we

jeffreyliberty, I think we all agree, or at least I do that we need to ban computerized voting and to have the vote counted by hand at the precinct. However here in Texas our Republican Presidential Primary was on May 29th. At the precinct vote counting won't do us any good to verify the primary results since it already happened. We should be working towards this goal for the November election though. In the meantime, or alongside of that we should be seeking to verify the vote. In a court of law you have to have proof that your rights were violated. By signing an affidavits you are certifying that this is how you voted. If enough people who did vote sign these saying they voted for Ron Paul and that number is greater than what was reported it is evidence of election fraud. A corrupt judge may very well throw it out. However by having the proof it allows us to show the public that election fraud did happen. It also gives us credibility and proof to use to get them to count votes by hand at the precinct. Exit polling would be great if it is done with a signed affidavits, but since the Texas primary is over, we have to go back and verify. If we canvas the precincts and verify that the numbers were correct, it will allow all of us to have a new found trust in the election system. I think all of us, you, myself, Dr. K, etc all know that election fraud is happening. You plan can help us in the next election in November and we should be working to get it done. However what the others are trying to do, if they can prove through these affidavits the numbers are not right, it will make your argument carry more weight to get them counted by hand. I tried to get our votes counted by hand in public view and I was told that we don't have a problem and it is not needed. Since they won't budge I need proof that election fraud is happening or at least at a minimum looks like it is happening to get the public support in getting votes counted by hand at the precinct.

I have the vote total by precinct for every candidate in my county. I have the early vote separated from the election day vote. I would like to run my own statistical analysis of the data. I personally would like to see the calculations behind the graphs that are being produced so I can compare my county using the same analysis. I still need to obtain the vote separated by machine for early voting and election day voting to have a good analysis. I will say though that in a few of the races I analyzed some of them looked like vote flipping. I will need to do further analysis before publishing any results....anyone that has the raw calculations for Travis County, please provide a url where those calculations are published. In liberty.

I think they are referring to affidavits

This is a bit different from the usual ask one or two exit-polls. I believe it's affidavits, which you can take house to house, and ask people to state who they voted for. That is not a worthless endeavor, as it should prove the truth, either way.

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).

Well exit polls as affidavits won't work either

... because you'd have to get 100% participation by court order to get results and even then no way to know what people fill out in an affidavit is the truth. In secret it would be more reliable but a spouse wanting to vote for Romney instead of Paul may not do that at an entry poll but in the booth would. Why not just count the ballots. Why does no one address that?

They are paid to get as many delegate names as possible

Exit polls are worthless. I think these guys are paid to do this and try to get as many Ron Paul names as possible.So they just keep posting over and over again. Seems like they might be worried about Texas now.

Exit polls were used to call at least a dozen primary elections

this year, and so were entrance polls. Yet, there is no evidence that any of these polls were done. However, they were acclaimed by the Zionist-controlled media as 'credible.'

By the way irregularities in the exit poll compared with the published results are just what you have indicated: the guide to now get those paper ballots--through after-exit polls.

Here fine effort is confirmed by the math, see here:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?369316-The-case-...

Scroll down to the bottom. This is BIG!!

Isn't that crazy?

I actually expected exit-polls, this year, but as (s)elections came and went, and it didn't happen, I thought we had better do this ourselves.
Then I signed up to be an election judge. That meant I was not able to do exit polls as I had a higher standard to maintain- I could not, legitimately or morally, and working as a judge for Travis County Elections, videotape anyone. But, I know what I saw and I know what I was told. I wish others had done polling in the precinct I worked. Sadly, nobody did.

Does make you wonder, though; if Mitt's the guy, where are the exit-polls to prove it?

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).

Your racism is showing

Exit polls aren't proof. You need the actual vote counts from the tape.

Moderators can't you do something about this!!!!!!!!!

What racism??

Who said anything about anyone's race?
I think you're cuckoo and probably the troll others are calling you.
Why do you waste your time doing this?

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).

Exit polling is how the

Exit polling is how the beauty contests are decided!!

doubt it

I think they sort of have the results before that event takes place. ....that is how the media can state with confidence what is happening with the votes before the polls are even closed. Ive never been polled, never seen a pollster outside an election precinct. They get their feed directly from fraudulently inputted data coming from the e-voting machines. That is the crux of the matter, that has always been the MAIN point in this fight for liberty. Everyone should focus on banning the machines.

They announced building 7 early

as well. Opps.

TOUCHDOWN!

Excellent news... I'd already given up hope on election fraud being uncovered.

If Anne Beckett is reading this, or if any of you know Anne Beckett personally, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE help her stay away from the windows and be careful!

This news will be very harmful to the powers that be, and the powers that be are basically the Mafia, writ large. It would not be too surprising that they would want Anne Beckett silenced one way or the other.

Careful Anne!

HONEST RON 2012!
LEGALIZE LIBERTY!

so far, I am good!

And i am alive.
I really didn't know if my first-person testimony would count for much, as it is just my relating what I saw. I suppose we'll see how far it gets, but anything I can do-- for right-- is what I will do.

I've been threatened, in the past; it may happen, again. I'll deal with it as it comes.

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).

Idea for you:

Perhaps it would be best to distribute your video testimony in multiple locations.

They'd have no reason to target you personally if your entire testimony is already out there in the hands of umpteen others already.

Do as much to document it as possible, and then duplicate the copies as much as possible, spreading them far and wide... YouTube alone certainly wouldn't do.

Thanks again for your service in our cause!

HONEST RON 2012!
LEGALIZE LIBERTY!

AnneBeck58

She replied to something I posted earlier, i was pretty shocked...if it indeed was her, sounded genuine. But there is a huge Troll infestation here so I am always skeptical.

"I am Troll fighter, number one"

-Ernest

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxWb-ViejPg

it was me.

Yes, i responded to you.
If someone has a question, ask. I'll answer as best I can.

We had SOME proof, but RNC does not care about Rules n Laws- they just break and then change 'em to suit whomever (not PAUL).