Updated with Action Plan: Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched.Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 14:29
Could Ron Paul have gotten 72% of the vote instead of 12%? Anne Beckett, election judge for Austin (Travis County), says it is so.
In fact, (corrected) as part of her job she did a preference poll of Republican voters for their party affiliation. As a result of the interactions offered by the voters (not solicited) she says that a minimum of 66% of the voters were likely voters for Ron Paul. As they gave her their preference she wrote a line on her hand, then, counted the total voters. Some 2/3 of the voters, she believed, went for Paul, NOT Romney (she wishes to be conservative, but says that at the bare minimum 66%, not 12%, of the votes went to Paul).
For credibility it is important to note that she took a complete poll and was there from 6:00 a.m. until closing (12 hours). The precinct she judged was 247-R.
Here are the 'acclaimed' numbers from the election board:
Scroll down to pg. 456. The results she is disputing are as follows:
Live voters, May 29
Mitt Romney: 72
Ron Paul: 15
Early voting (absentee ballots)
Mitt Romney: 41
Ron Paul: 4
Don’t feel depressed about all that has happened. We have been severely cheated. Apparently, in this case the real numbers in the live voting are 72 or more for Paul and 15 or less for Romney.
Ms. Beckett states categorically that these numbers are false. In her words, it’s “completely false.”
UPDATE: She has noted another anomaly. There were over 155 Republican votes in her precinct, not 87, as listed above. One wonders how many other times were the number of Paul votes in Texas precincts simply purged by these vile computerized voting machines.
The judge has filed an affidavit with ElectionFraudRemedy.com.
Tune in to this epic show. Dr. K. will interview Ms. Beckett about her findings and will discuss the full strategy going forward for proving the fraud in other counties and states.
Note: here are all the charts by our mathematicians on vote flipping: https://www.sugarsync.com/share/bzvpf3dyq5hre
BIG UPDATE: this Travis County chart is a must see, which confirms Ms. Beckett's findings. You'll see what a normal chart looks like versus one demonstrating flipping -
Note how Dr. Paul starts out at a higher vote count level than Romney, only to be suppressed with increasing vote counting.
Newest update: I now have the voter rolls for Travis County precinct 247 and other suspect counties. Any volunteers willing to help?
For a detailed charting of the rigging in Dr. Paul's own city and county see also:
Previous update: See also this powerful anaylsis by one of our top experts in Riverside, County, CA, also breaking news:
UPDATE: Tools needed to prove election rigging
This is a systematic plan to prove election rigging.
First, it is necessary to procure the voter roll of all registered voters in a given precinct. Then, it is needed to get the poll tapes from each precinct, that is the tape spat out at the end of voting by the machines.
It isn't necessary to get the whole tape. Just the end, where the total votes are listed or the total votes for each candidate.
The tools are as follows:
Tool #1: The Script:
Hello Ms./Mr. ___________. I’m __________ ____________ with the Ron Paul grassroots organizations Citizens for Honest Voting. We are conducting a grassroots exit poll to confirm the results of the recent election in your precinct. Would you possibly be a Ron Paul supporter or voter?
(If yes)...great, did you vote for Dr. Paul in the presidential election in precinct __________. (If yes) Great. We have reason to believe that the vote count in your precinct isn’t accurate. Just trying to confirm the vote as best as possible to keep our voting honest.
Would it be OK (Ms./Mr. ____) if I send you a special form for confirming the vote? Would it be possible to get your email (or send to the address)?
You can also confirm you vote on-line. Are you on the Internet (steer to www.ronpaulvotecount.org)?
Would it be OK to get some more information from you, so I can help you confirm your vote?
Would you also be willing to do an affidavit to confirm your vote? This way ALL Ron Paul votes will be recognized.
(Or, you can offer to send or email the form to them)
Answers to standard questions:
"My voting info is private." A- that is fully appreciated but you would like to see truly honest voting, wouldn't you? That's why we're doing this poll."
"What do you hope to accomplish with all this?" A- "just to make sure the voting is entirely accurate and honest. This is important for you and for the future of our country, wouldn't you agree?"
Note: then go through the After-Action Exit Poll and get all the voters’ information. Stress the importance of the affidavit, if they could do it. Tell them that this is powerful proof of the vote, the kind of proof needed to keep the voting honest. Keep track of all the voters and the vote total. Then, you’ll fill out an affidavit confirming the assessment.
Tool # 2: After-Action Exit Poll
This is the tool that must be filled out after contacting every Ron Paul voter. It provides an immediate proof of the vote count:
Tool #3: Final confirmation is through affidavits at www.ronpaulvotecount.org
The affidavit is procured, signed, notarized and then uploaded.
Grassroots is where it is!!!