13 votes

9/11: a decade later, a whole new ballgame

The official accepted belief on the towers is that the two were destroyed by 4 small nuclear devices, two in the basement, two on upper floors, that produced over a million degrees of heat that dissolved the building, put out minor radiation for a short distance and kept fires burning for months. It vaporized enough steel to build 3 huge aircraft carriers and huge beams hundreds of yards away show more damage than anything in Hiroshima. This is the official opinion of DARPA and the US Army. This is highly classified but I am printing it anyway.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I am Goddamned glad that the

I am Goddamned glad that the pinheads who disagree with myself and Veterans Today and the U.S. military on the mechanics that brought down the WTCs are not allowed to go to hospital ERs and direct surgery or otherwise shove their weight around. I personally wish they would all show their manliness by cleaning cat boxes by turning deposited material into sandwiches for their Star Wars and SpongeBob lunch boxes.

Beyond that, yes WTC 7 was preset with a nuke in the basement. The nuke MAY have been removed. WTC 6 was loaded the previous night and morning to attain the pictured result. No nuke.
Nanothermate was utilized to cut the cores in WTC I and II. It appears a quantity of it was scattered about to provide the illusion it took down the WTCs, which would indicate that the U.S. Government did this treachery instead of the Silverstein/Lowrey/BlackStone bunch, Bush cabal and Israeli mercenaries hired by The Crown.

Howard T. Lewis III

Perhaps the most significant thing about this article is...

that Duff is corroborating what "Drake" and Benjamin Fulford have been saying about the military regarding preparation for mass arrests. Read between the lines...

Duff does it again

is there anything this man does not know, I just hope most or all of what he types is truthful. Such eyeopeners about romney.

I am fearful of what the future will hold with him as president , imagine all the crony neocons getting back into the whitehouse all the same ones from bush 2 first and second term...........SCARY!!!

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

Official v Unofficial 9/11 nonsense

Oh, I see. The "official story" and then the "unofficial, official story" to sucker in those who can't believe the "official story". 4 nukes?? Would not radiation would be a serious problem here? Both stories are complete nonsense. The best probable evidence so far is nanothermite and a controlled demolition to create the complete destruction needed to hide as much of the evidence as possible - hidden behind the camouflage of two plane collisions. Can't see what this has to do with this presidential campaign though?


ClirChris F- Cat box therapy is indicated. Or homework. Your choice.

Howard T. Lewis III


F e m a was there the night of the 10th ,
they did not bring any geiger counters ,
there was no need to have them right ,

we should just believe everything the official government says , after all they dont lie, the private sector is doing just fine

1st responders cancer rates and so on just look at the proof

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL


should probably just go back to watching tv and then go to sleep after that.

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

DJP333's picture


This was a very well written, heavy article. If true, the liberty movement has much work to do...all over the world.

"It’s not pessimistic, brother, because this is the blues. We are blues people. The blues aren’t pessimistic. We’re prisoners of hope but we tell the truth and the truth is dark. That’s different." ~CW

I'd like to find more about the $131 billion to Canada last week

How can this happen? In a quick search, I found info on the Fed Reserve giving them billions between 2008 & 2010 but not much on this latest one. What in the hell can we do to make this stop???

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know Peace." - Jimi Hendrix

Mitt Romney: A Clear and Present Danger

to our freedom

2 Chron 7:13-14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.

That's the first I've heard

That's the first I've heard of that 4 nuke thing.

Search YouTube for interview

with Dimitri Khalezov, former nuclear intelligence officer for the USSR.
It's somewhere with the other 9/11 videos. He gives a pretty good explanation of why he thinks mini nukes were used.

I don't beieve the nuke theory, here's why.

Eye witnesses state that bombs went off deep in the sub levels, both before and after the plane strikes, firemen went into a normal lobby, to find that it was destroyed when they came back down, even stating that it looked like a bomb had gone off in the lobby.
With heat reaching 1 million degrees, as the article states, these eye witnesses would not be alive to tell the story. That simple.
I believe nano thermite was used to bring all 3 buildings down.

the heat

the heat reaches 1 million or so in an instant of a second allowing for the vaporization of the steel and the melting to a molten state that would follow creating intensely hot pools of molten steel.

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

i dont agree with you

here is why

i agree thermite, suitcase nukes, conventional , all of it was used.

they shipped off all of the evidence , never before has that been done oh yeah , oklahomah anyone ?

the patterns have been set in history , just open your eyes and look for the patterns.

WE ARE IN TROUBLE WITH A ROMNEY PRES or a OBAMA PRES , which is going to be worse in the pages of history though

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

It's also speculated that many

It's also speculated that many more smaller explosives were planted on every other floor or so as to make the demolition controlled and ensure the complete collapse of the towers.

Another question Ive had is

Another question Ive had is if the Bush family wanted to invade Iraq, then why did we agree to cease fire during the first gulf war?


Well, the Bushs', Obama, Clintons...

Well, the Bushs', Obama, Clintons...you see, are all different masks on the same face. Whichever party is in power, it doesn't matter really. Matters they differ on are social issues and the wealth of corporate america(traditional conservatism) vs. the wealth of individuals(liberalism). But in the end, the latter contrast does not make a difference either way. Big bankers (largely originating from the House of Rothschild) control the economy and are able to engineer economic busts and booms. In addition, the same few inter-related families also control big pharmaceutical, big business, big everything..you name it.

Therefore, the president is not the one making the decisions upwards of 90% of the time. Have you heard the term "neocon?" Short for "neoconservative"? Yes, well there are also the "neodems" which dictate to, fund and hold control over the democratic party similarly. An organization called the CFR, which is supposedly a "democratic think-tank," is actually a hardcore lobbying group; they feed their ideas that are approved by the way up fat cats like Rockefeller(who had a hand in starting the CFR, CNP, trilateral commission) to the neodems. The CNP is basically the evangelical republican version of the CFR. Together, these "organizations" tell the president's "advisers" what to tell the president.

So in short, to answer your question: George Bush himself was more than likely not to have made that decision on his own. Higher-up's are behind all the decisions of which their ultimate goal is to transform Earth into a conforming, world-governed, single-economy fascist planet with you as their slave. What a life we live in, isn't it!

i still don't understand why

i still don't understand why whoever did this would want a controlled demolition. 1, more destruction would mean more blind rage, which seems to be what they were going for. 2, having a controlled demolition only makes the operation more obvious


Because an uncontrolled demolition might have...

presented too many lose ends. The towers might have stayed partially intact or building over a much larger area might have provided evidence Guiliani would have been unable to confiscate. Besides, this provided greater profits for the investment bankers, who knew EXACTLY what stocks to sell short. Listen to Max Keiser on 911 some time.

I would venture

that they wanted the towers to be completely destroyed for the following reasons:

1. if they had just planted the nuclear devices alone, the whole building wouldn't have collapsed and the event may seem to some "less memorable" and they wanted 911 to be deeply ingrained in the peoples' minds. Hence, the choosing of the day september 11th (9/11). I have always doubted that sandpeople are familiar with our emergency contact system anyways...same goes for the false-flag 7/7 bombings in London. The dates were chosen to resonate with peoples' minds. They are not coincidental.

2. The insurance money. More destruction = more money. Larry Silverstein cashed in on all 3 buildings that collapsed. Hell, one wasn't even hit by a plane! That's how greedy and despicable he truly is; he was god damned lusting to get the money for all three buildings.

3. To your point about controlled demolition being blatant: The controlled demo is only obvious to those familiar with demolitions. Rightly so, there have been a ton of people who work in demolitions that have come out and called bullshit on the official story.

These people believe they can fool anyone, and that no one will question them because they are too distracted with TV and society's other junk to be concerned at all. The ones who do want to speak often don't because they are afraid of ridicule or worse.

No I don't think that is what

No I don't think that is what I meant. If they had simply haphazardly planted the explosives/nukes whatever in the building, then the building would have collapsed to the side and caused even MORE damage than what happened on 9/11. And it would have had the added benefit of not looking like an obvious job.


I see what you're saying

now. But it seems that the explosives were NOT randomly placed, rather they were placed meticulously, and this is why the building collapsed the way they did. Had they placed many of the nuclear-type bombs all throughout the buildings "randomly", that would just be too obvious, as huge explosions would be seen and heard in many areas of the towers and this would blow their cover.

I agree that had the tower collapsed on its side that indeed it would have been more easily believable to the public. But again, presuming Silverstien and company wanted the towers collapsed completely, the way they did it was their only option. Had they only put bombs at the bottom of the towers, once the plane hit and the whole tower collapses sideways from the impact of a comparatively tiny jetplane...well, I think you get it.

Here's an "interesting" bump!

Here's an "interesting" bump!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown