Relying on Secrecy, Infiltration, Covert Means is Repugnant in a Free and Open SocietySubmitted by David144 on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 01:31
JFK- A monolithic Conspiracy????? Read carefully.
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society;...We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers, which are cited to justify it...For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion,"
I would ask those who continue to say "Rand is playing politics" and supporting it or saying things like "We need to pretend to support Romney...endorse..campaign...etc." or pretend to support the establishment. Why not endorse torture, wars. Do we think it's ok if they secretly infiltrate the Ron Paul campaign. I've heard Ron Paul say "Do unto others". It's not "do unto others as they do unto you", but "do unto others as you would have done unto you". In other words "lead by example". Ron is an example.
The very word "Secrecy" is repugnant to us and if this was the way Rand Paul hoped to secure a nomination for the presidency in 2016 or the vice presidency in 2012, or if he thinks he needs to kiss Romney's >>> to get ahead, or play the game, his methods of "concealment of pertinent facts" and trying to "justify it" is "repugnant to a free and open society" and of the liberty movement. We don't need to use "covert means" or "infiltration" to "expand our sphere of influence". And those who continue to support these means are partaking of "a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion,"
No Compromise. No Secrecy, lies, pretending. It is contrary to the purity and why we support Ron Paul and the liberty movement.
Please see the qualifications of Ron Paul's campaign manager at the following links. DON'T BE IGNORANT: