Let's Ask the "Lawyers for Ron Paul" - Legitimate Questions Only PleaseSubmitted by vinceableworld on Sat, 06/16/2012 - 21:20
UPDATED: I myself was slightly opposed at the start of this thread... now back to neutral as I am seeing statutes and titles/codes which need to be looked up and see if they apply to our situation.
I think a post needs to be started to actually ask legal questions to the "Lawyers for Ron Paul" before we give them our list of delegates. That list is QUITE valuable. We should consider the importance of making sure we are getting CONSIDERATION for our value when we are making deals with - IMO only - the Devil.
Maybe these lawyers are different. I'm happy to give them the benefit of the very small sliver of doubt in the front of my head...
So to start with here's a question: The Lawyers only need ONE delegate as a plaintiff who is bound that doesn't wish to be bound... in order to make their case.
Why do they require "as many as possible to sign up?"
Submitted by FreedomIsAbsolute
2 part question: 1st part, What/who has given you the authority to take over the Ron Paul2012 campaign,
2nd part, Where can I find a statement by Ron Paul himself acknowledging the fact that you guys are in fact/have already taken over his campaign?
Submitted by An Abandoned
I would like to see the following questions answered officially by both the legal team and by the Ron Paul campaign. Personally I will not agree to be a plaintiff until I receive satisfactory answers for these:
1. Does Ron Paul approve of this lawsuit?
2. Can the plaintiffs be held responsible for the legal fees of the defendants if the case is lost?
3. Can the Republican Party exclude/ban people from the party if they are party to a lawsuit against them?
4. Will plaintiffs be called on to testify in court?
NOTE: I only want written and/or voice recorded answers from the legal team and from the campaign.
Thank you freedom and abandoned for the legitimate questions which I have pulled out of the chatter. I'm curious why how it takes less time for people objecting to this thread to keep telling us to listen to the audio when if they know the audio answers our questions... they don't just type the answer?
I'm not interested in an emotional appeal. I want "Black Ink on White Paper" as Rod Class likes to say it. Show me the congressional records, tell me what statute we're talking about... what precedent are you running off of here? What are your requirements of the delegates? Do you need ONE delegate? 20? Or do you need them ALL? Don't just cheer rahh rahh and tell me you can do it. That's what you HAVE to say in order to get our money or our names. What these people here want to know is HOW you're going to do it.
Now please - if you want our support - just start answering. The audio does not answer the paragraph of questions I've listed above.
Sorry I just get started asking and I have this URGE to KNOW MORE!