56 votes

Romney & Santorum: you owe us ALL your delegates

Cheating, beating our people up, torturing them, breaking bones, twisting fingers out of joints, faking slates, stuffing ballots--and it's even worse than this!

Those who say that some of this happened and that there is no recourse: keep in mind that assault and battery is universal. The RNC is not exempt from the consequences.

Calling all delegates from vote-rigged states, it’s time to take BIG action. It’s time to join the lawsuit. You are just as disenfranchised as those delegates who have been directly brutalized.

They attack our delegates by stealth—through electronic rigging—which is equally traumatic as those in-the-face shenanigans at the caucuses and conventions.

This culling of our delegates through electronic rigging makes us appear losers when we are really winners.

Our team of legal experts has made it clear that the more the merrier. The judge will look strongly on larger groups of delegates from each state. However, if there are only a few, it’s not as powerful.

It is crucial that the delegates join up with the suit. Time is of essence.

Here is the point. Dr. Paul lost hundreds of delegates through election rigging. The means of rigging are diverse and include fabricated voters, as occurred in New Hampshire, Iowa, and South Carolina, direct vote flipping through electronic rigging, as occurred in dozens of states, ballot stuffing, as occurred in certain caucus states, the purging of provisional ballots, as occurred in Hawaii, and suppression of voters at the polls, as occurred in Nevada.

However, the biggest rig is the fixing of the votes in the machines, especially the central tabulator. Here, the vote count was systematically flipped in order to move Paul delegates to Romney and in some cases Santorum.

There are thresholds in each state to earn delegates. The machine rig flipped the vote so greatly that Dr. Paul fell below that threshold.
You simply fill out an affidavit and state that you have reason to believe that your delegateship was lost as a result of shenanigans in the vote count. If you have any direct eyewitness accounts, state that.

Who are the candidates? ALL delegates. Here is why. It is not only the rigging of specific votes in such states. It is the rigging of the entire election. This is through undermining the momentum of the election. By creating the false impression of a failure of Dr. Paul to win, this affects voters all over the country.

If voters truly knew the REAL Paul vote count, that he was winning the popular vote or in a close second in the initial states, a greater percentage of votes would have went over to the doctor. The point is EVERY SINGLE ONE of our delegates has been disenfranchised. In elections momentum and perception are very big deals.

Specific evidence of disenfranchisement:

• In Iowa there were 141 precincts with errors and irregularities, some 10% of the total. The vote remains “uncertifiable.” There is direct evidence of vote manipulation AFTER the results were reported to the GOP
• In New Hampshire the hand-counted votes show a Paul win or near-win; the electronic votes show a loss, except those precincts ‘watched’ by www.watchthevote2012.com, where Paul won; charts show rigging in through the machines, suppressing a potential Paul victory
• In South Carolina there is massive evidence of rigging, as shown through the mathematical charts
• In Alabama mathematical charts document massive rigging, as proven by the fact that the votes for delegates is 300% higher than the Paul votes
• In Michigan exit polls by RevPAC show Paul at 20%, while he was only allotted a mere 12%. Statistically, the 12% must be false
• In Wisconsin an exit polls show Paul at first or second. When these findings were presented to the City of Milwaukee Board of Elections in the form of a political service, the Board removed all results from the presidential election from its Website and refuses to replace it
• In Hawaii on Maui and Oahu Islands provisional ballots were NOT counted that could have resulted in a Paul victory
• In Maine there are still precincts listed as zero votes where there really were voters
• In Texas Anne Beckett’s entrance poll determined Paul as the winner with 66% of the vote, while the ‘official’ results show the good doctor with only 12% of the vote; also, in this state there is mathematical proof of severe election rigging in Travis County and Brazoria County.
• In California an exit poller in Los Angeles polled Paul at five votes for every one of Romney; however, Paul was given only 12% of the vote in that area
• Regarding Maryland, charting of the vote count indicates massive rigging. Certain Paul supporters have reporter smaller vote count numbers in their precincts than the total voters that they know personally went to the polls
• In Virginia there is significant proof that there was electronic rigging of the votes in certain precincts

This thread will be continuously updated with more data. Use it as the platform for evidence of more sheningans in other states. Bullet points will be added, as you post them and they are discovered.

Plus, help us prove the vote count. Have you uploaded your vote yet to www.ronpaulvotecount.org? Especially looking for voters in Travis County precincts 238 and 247.

Delegates: get in this lawsuit. Soon, the rigging will be systematically proved, which will greatly support the case. The lawsuit is also about documenting the rigging.

Don’t wait. And don't be frightened. Protect yourself from being cheated in Tampa and more. Sign on, NOW!!

To join the suit go to http://www.electionfraudremedy.com/ See the press release from Lawyers For Ron Paul here:

http://www.dailypaul.com/240611/press-release-ron-paul-suppo...

UPDATE: Tell us what you CAN do to help this effort, not what can't be done.

Read more, Lawyers for Ron Paul Press Release:
http://www.libertyusapac.org/wordpresspac/2012/06/17/press-r...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

WatchTheVote2012

In the above statement it incorrectly mentions us. It should be www.watchthevote2012.com or https://www.facebook.com/groups/watchthevote2012/ not watchthevote.com..

Thank You.
Edward True
Core Team WatchTheVote2012

optimystic's picture

Nice Compilation

I would only add that MSM network entrance and exit polls in Iowa showed Dr. Paul as the winner. Only when the votes were spirited out of the state to be counted in a secret location did the results show him coming in 3rd. These same exit polls were "seemingly" accurate in other states.

The exits showed a Romney/Santorum tie

http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/ia

The exits showed Mitt and Rick at 25, with Ron at 21. Exits were actually very close to the final results.

all you delegates belong to

all you delegates belong to us.

yesterday

My Republican Central Committee meeting, we talked about people being forced to vote absentee ballots, like me, even though there are three polling stations near where I live. I, and everyone who lives near me, are forced to send our votes in.. we can walk to the polling station, and deliver them, but they are still in an envelope, which when you bring it in, the poll worker may open and decide to give you a provisional ballot.

It would be good if the lawsuit could reach so far to end this mail in voting in CA. There is no way we can know how far and deep the fraud here goes. How did all those who registered GOP actually for Romney and not Ron Paul, in Chico?

As you know, I wrote to my registrar asking questions, and so far, all that has gotten me is no answers, but I see Ron Paul's numbers going up.. as team leader, I have now "placed third" in the state for people turning out for Ron Paul. More people in CA should contact their registrar and demand answers.. watch their poll numbers rise too.

THANK YOU Dr. K and the lawyers and the wonderful posters here who are doing a marvelous job fighting this good fight.

Thank you

Big bump.
Posted on Twitter to educate others.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

They Shoud Lead With The Things That Can Be Proved

and/or documented. Proving vote rigging will be more problematic since it woud require court orders for the machines and data cards to be analyzed, etc. This would only effect Tampa, if it makes MSM news, however it would serve to be a deterrent for future elections and would be the basis for insisting that our elected representatives introduce legislation that voters can receive a receipt, vote by papaer and have it counted and witnessed, etc.

one thing is very important that you are missing

GOP Presidential primaries and caucuses are NOT elections, they are party member preferences or as Dr. Paul says Straw Polls. They cannot even be actual elections by state law, they are giant private clubs, and those clubs can do what they want. So I don't think "vote fraud" is proper terminology, just plain "fraud" is more appropriate. The political parties are creating an illusion that a real vote was cast for a candidate to be elected. The truth is that only general elections are legal elections where your vote counts. As a matter of fact, a political party never has to hold a caucus or primary, they can simply select thier nominee, but they hold those primaries etc., to make it seem as though people elect a certain candidate, when they then rig machines, don't count provisionals, don't count whole counties or precincts etc. That's proof that they are pretending to hold elections when in reality they are not, it's a scam. So the question is can a judge intervene in a private club's phony elections? I would say maybe.

You will never see a US Senator or a US House Representative get elected through the delegate process, that because the people have a direct vote by law for these federal positions. A President is not directly elected by the people and that's where I think this lawsuit needs to be adjusted. Not even when you vote in November for President this year, do you vote directly for anyone. It's a popular vote by congressional district by ultimately by the electors.

Other than US Senator and US House Representatives, there is only one other position that is elected to a federal position (even if it's only for a day), that is an elector. It's in the Constitution of the United States and that my friends is where we have them by the balls when it comes to the courts. They gloss over these electors at these state conventions and district conventions, but that is where they are chosen 95% of the time. Who chooses these? The state delegates, if the vote is rigged or is not complete or not fully counted, then the wrong amount of state delegates are choosing electors which are not part of a club and are mentioned directly in the Constitution. So in Oklahoma where they ended a convention according to the wrong order, this is a prime and direct cause of choosing electors in a false and wrong manner, and would qualify for a judge or judge's panel to intervene.

Base this lawsuit on the Elector process or it will fail.

The intention of the riggers is to prevent a Paul win

That is why the Santorum-inspired clique threw Mr. Herford to the ground and virtually twisted Mr. Helwig's fingers out of his sockets.

The conspiracy to prevent the win DOES bring this under federal jurisdiction, especially the conspiracy against the delegates.

It is understood that caucuses are parties. But is legal at the Moose Club to assault someone, just because it's within the party structure? How about assault and battery? Does the RNC have immunity from this, because it's at the caucus?

Naysayers, always talking about "how we will lose," why don't you come up with a real plan on how we can win, like this lawsuit where a loss cannot hurt us but a win would help us secure a real victory.

Dr K

That is all fine but what makes it a federal lawsuit? Those reasons can all be handled in a state court.

The only federal connection is the electors.

The Federal connection is Federal President

But maybe we can sue in both if it is legal.

Because everything they are doing is a conpiracy to influence

the presidential election--and they ARE committing crimes such as assault, such as punching delegates, such as sicking the police after them, because of their voting preferences, such as forging slates.

The purpose is to prevent Dr. Paul from being nominated for the presidential election. That's what makes it federal.

What do you plan to do

if/when the RNC says that people engaged in legal litigation against the Party may not be delegates at the Party's convention?

Has this been taken under consideration?

Yes!

my concern

as well.

"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul

Since The Primaries and Caucuses Are The Way Candidates

get to the general election, then it is a federal matter even though the business is conducted by a private party. Fraud is illegal even when conducted by a private party. Think of the laws that pertain to winning prizes for product purchases, etc. and the laws that are in place and have to be followed. Also, when a party sets a rules then the effect is that they have to follow those rules by law in order to not commit fraud and voter disenfranchisement.

No that is not true

thats what they want you to believe.

A person who is a Republican (or anyone else) does not even have to go through the primaries to get on the general ballot. You simply have to get the required signatures or pay the required fee (in some states) to be put on the general election ballot. A primary or caucus means nothing, it is an internal party function that members of the club (the GOP for example) choose to participate in. Some states have rigged the system for the tax payers to fund a primary for the 2 big clubs, but those primary preference votes have no power by state law, they elect nobody.

The basic rule states that the "State Secretary of the political party" shall submit that political party's nominee for whatever race to the Secretary of State to be entered onto the ballot.

The state never says in its law that the winner of the Primary vote will automatically be placed on the ballot in the general election. So even if someone lost a primary in most states, they can turn back around and get the required signatures to be placed on the ballot in the general, some states outlaw that like Alaska, but nearly every state has a provision for a write-in, like Murkowski in Alaska who lost the GOP race to Miller only to create a write-in campaign with the help of the establishment GOP and even Democrats win her Senate seat.

Joe

so I do not have to post my post under your string, Please read you string. It is an intersting point I make.

I BEG TO DIFFER for TEXAS

but those primary preference votes have no power by state law, they elect nobody.

That statement for TEXAS is NOT TRUE.

gingrich

too

lbtbruce

Bump

.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

wouldn't this be good to post

elsewhere? what good is it going to do on the DP? is there a daily santorum or mitt?

you should

probably read it again.

"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul