61 votes

Richard Gage Packs House in Boston for Premiere of "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out," Truth is Alive.

For a standing room only audience, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Richard Gage continued his national tour unveiling the new documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" The film centers around the interviews of dozens of experts in every aspect of the science related to the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11 - metallurgists, physicists, engineers, demolition professionals, chemists, architects, and others. The credentialed professionals and scientists with decades of experience in their fields go on record explaining why the official story of the destruction of the World Trade Center Buildings is patently, scientifically impossible.

The tour is covering 30 cities nationwide, with Gage present at each showing to introduce the film and hold an extensive question-and-answer period afterwards. In an audience poll, at the West Newton Theater outside of Boston, about one-third of the audience raised their hands when asked if, at the present moment, they saw nothing wrong with the official story and accepted it. Another third answered that they had questions and had not made up their minds, with the rest answering that they believed the Towers were a pre-planned demolition. Gage warmly welcomed those who said they were still believers of the official story and thanked them for allowing him to present his evidence to them.

The question-and-answer period was stimulating and thoughtful, with Gage and chemical engineer Mark Basile, who appears in the film, answering technical questions together.

Gage acknowledged that the subject of a false flag attack, possibly perpetrated by or with the assistance of an element within our own government, was an uncomfortable one for many people to deal with, but stressed that the direction our country has taken, and the cost in terms of Constitutional rights, national treasure, and soldiers' lives are still very much with us, and evolving daily. Gage remarked that no one would, without good reason, undertake to become the bearer of such an unpleasant message, and that his own costs by now included his house and his marriage. Gage and his wife split amicably after the stresses and pressures of Gage's life became too much.

The Portland, Maine Phoenix newspaper gave the recent Portland showing a favorable review, saying:

[The film] raises questions about the scientific integrity of several major reports about the events that day, including those issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the 9/11 Commission. It calls for a new, independent investigation that takes into account evidence that is inconsistent with widely accepted explanations.

Among those pieces of evidence:

• The buildings fell symmetrically and with uniform acceleration. suggesting that critical columns must have been removed in a steady pattern;

•Eyewitness accounts of explosions;

•The pulverization of huge amounts of concrete;

•Remnants of thermite and nanothermite — which can create the extremely high temperatures needed to melt steel and iron — in WTC dust samples;

•The lack of precedent — no skyscraper before or since has ever collapsed due to fire.

Neither the 95-minute movie nor AE911Truth offers a hypothesis about why three buildings would have been demolished, or who orchestrated such a demolition.

The great challenge for the so-called truth movement isn't to answer those questions. It is to get more people on board. To be perceived as more than nut-jobs. To be taken seriously. In 9/11: Explosive Evidence, several psychologists and trauma counselors are interviewed about the cognitive barriers erected around 9/11.

The film opens with interviews of 9/11 family members who sponsored the documentary.

A $10 donation is requested but Gage says:

We will not turn anyone away from the education of the crime of the century that has manipulated millions of people across the country and around the world to go to war.

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" DVD HERE

Full film can be watched online HERE

Future Tour Dates:


New York, NY 24 June

Philadelphia, PA 25 June

Pinellas Park, FL
(St. Petersburg/ Tampa) 28 June

Daytona Beach, FL 30 June

Atlanta, GA 2 July

Nashville, TN 3 July

Bozeman, MT 5 July

Alameda, CA 9 July

San Francisco, CA 11 July

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Great post.

I only hope that my friends can overcome their disbelief enough to watch the video. That cognitive barrier is incredibly cemented.

NYC Sunday (tomorrow) showing details

For New Yorkers 2 showings Sunday 6/24:

Theater 80
80 Saint Marks Place
New York, NY
map: http://mapq.st/JxOvEs

Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew
263 West 86th Street
New York, NY

more info: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/events.html#Upcoming_Speaking

A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali



it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Update DC another success, up next NYC

the big one get ready (this Sunday)


A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali

Much of Gage's evidence is legitimate

And I agree with his conclusion that the towers were destroyed by means other than simply the impact of the planes and subsequent fires, and ultimately that 9/11 was a false flag event.

However, his organization is unfortunately heavily infiltrated and compromised at the highest levels (including board of directors). As a result it is in part serving a gatekeeper function, and certain well-placed individuals within AE911Truth are playing key roles in marginalizing and suppressing critical eyewitness testimony which is arguably the best evidence proving a false flag operation on 9/11.

See for example:

See also this and this and this and this. David Chandler is closely associated with AE911Truth, and Kevin Ryan was (and probably still is) on its board. Likewise for Justin Keogh.

The rabbit hole is deep on this one but this is crucial stuff.

The "best evidence" is the physics of the destruction of the

towers themselves, the presence of incendiary residue (there should not have been one speck of thermite anywhere in Manhattan, not a single speck, it doesn't occur in nature never mind this high quality military grade,) the molten steel, the debris field and the clocked cannonballs of 20-ton steel assemblies blown laterally for two football fields.

I stopped reading your links when I came across the Pentagon "flyover" words which indicate that this collection of vague innuendo is about the Pentagon honey pot. It's simple: Gage says he is sticking to his area of expertise. He's an architect, not a pilot. He leaves the Pentagon to others and doesn't take a position. It's a wise policy in my opinion.

A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali

You're putting your foot in your mouth & making my point for me.

As you'd know if you'd have bothered reading even one or two minutes into the main link I posted, Gage is NOT sticking to his area of expertise. That's exactly the problem. I agree with you that he lacks the knowledge and/or expertise to weigh in on the Pentagon, and that it would therefore be "a wise policy" for him to leave "the Pentagon to others" and not "take a position". However, he has done the exactly opposite. He has been surrounded by extremely and systematically dishonest individuals whose influence has caused him to step way OUTSIDE of his area of expertise and to weigh in heavily on the Pentagon event, promoting known disinformation on the subject that even many of his own peers and colleagues readily recognize as such. So, by your own (very reasonable) standard, he has done something very UNWISE.

This is why, despite weighing in heavily in writing via a bogus hit piece that he later admitted was written or co-written for him by unnamed others, he absolutely refuses to debate or discuss the subject (and the things written in "his" paper about it) with the people on the receiving end of he and his handlers' assault.

Your inability to spend more than 30 seconds reading anything I posted explains why you are making nonsensical charges of "vague innuendo" and repeating years-old "honeypot" talking points: You've soaked up enough propaganda that you're taking other people's word on the matter and you've closed your mind so much that you can't even bring yourself to HEAR the other side let alone objectively consider it.

In the same vein, I bet you haven't even read the actual nanothermite paper in full and are just taking people's word for it. If you have that would put you in the extreme minority even within "the movement". I've personally done (informal) surveys and confirmed this. Very, very few people have read it, and even less have comprehended it, because it is long and LOADED with incomprehensible technojargon. I'm not saying the conclusion isn't (or is) correct, but this is not, in my view, a good foundation for a "truth movement" to be built upon.

On the other hand, everything else you cite I agree with and think is critical evidence. It's also much easier for the layman to understand which is vital. As I said I'm not trying to diminish or discredit it the way you are with the eyewitness at the Pentagon and their damning accounts. Please actually spend time at those links instead of just having this uniformed knee-jerk reaction about matters you haven't yet taken any time to learn about.

Posting links and saying "it's all there, read it" is not

an argument. If you have something to say summarize the main points concisely, like I do. So far you have given a lot of ad hom and vague suggestion ("he has stepped outside his area of expertise"...ok, EXACTLY what "known disinformation" has he "promoted?") No one is going to spend time reading trashy links because someone says so, and so far that's all they seem to be.

In case you haven't noticed the critical thinking skills at this website are far above the typical forum. You can't blow your smoke and mirrors here.

A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali

False flag theater - good for

False flag theater - good for ten years and counting.

I went and saw the movie on

I went and saw the movie on June 8 in Buffalo and it was excellent. These are all professionals in there fields and as far as i'm concerned the cat is out of the bag. Apparently I'm not the only one.


If you ignore building 7, the govt version seems plausible

But, when you factor in building 7, their version of events falls to pieces. We know the BBC reported the fall of building 7 BEFORE it fell. And I remember U.S. reporters reporting on the scene saying that building 7 might be taken down in a controlled demolition, moments before it fell. And the way in which it fell was obviously a controlled demolition. And, if you examine the video of the fall of building 7 you can see the blasts go off for the demolition. The only way those explosives could have been placed that quickly in building 7 would be for it to have been done BEFORE the planes struck the towers! That fact alone proves that the govt. knew that the towers were going to fall, which in turn proves that the entire thing was an orchestrated event.

Exposes Prior Knowledge.

+1, yes building 7 is easy to cover quickly & explain briefly.
you wrapped it in a para, great.

I read the book

These are the EXPERTS speaking, NOT the select group appointed by the government to analyze it. It's like appointing the fox that killed the chicken to determine what really when you have the farmer and the other chickens that were witnesses saying WTH?? Eventually the real truth will come out when someone in a high position is dying and has to get the truth off of his or her chest. That is usually the way it works. Thanks for posting, I plan on watching the online docu and in my mind, Gage is a true patriot.

Keep this bumped up


Please share the message of truth.

This is a great film, I shared the online link with everyone I know. Gage's first documentary film Blueprint for Destruction is very informative as well.

This is key

and as Paul craig roberts has said many times, you can´t win an argument if you accept false truths on this subject..

Try you may, but fail you will everytime..

FLASH: I'm hearing that Dr. Roberts and Richard will be speaking

together at an upcoming event. Anyone with details please share...pure history being made.


Dr. Roberts was an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan, and an editor of the Wall Street Journal and the National Review. He has held the William E. Simon Chair for Economic Policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown University, and is a Distinguished Fellow at the Cato Institute and a Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution.

Author of: "What we know and don’t know about 9/11"

"I will begin by stating what we know to be a solid incontrovertible scientific fact. We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to “pancake” at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false." - Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali

Atlanta July 2nd

My understanding is that Paul Craig Roberts and Cynthia McKinney may be at the Atlanta event along with Gage.

Thanks. That's right Congresswoman McKinney will be there


A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali

And you can't win an election

And you can't win an election if you accept the legitimacy of a candidate who "won" by fraud.

I'm an Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Member

and I vote unequivocally that this was indeed an inside job. We have to get to the bottom of this. Unfortunately I believe it's going to take an Iceland type culling of corrupted officials in politics and law enforcement to get it done...This should speak volumes about the coming US presidential election. We need an AMERICAN PRESIDENT AND THAT'S RON PAUL.

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

911 Truth-s,

best wishes for your endeavors, & success. 911 Truth is a great service to the disturbed humanity ~

Everyone knows that an entire

Everyone knows that an entire house is likely to collapse if it has a small fire in the corner the house. /sarcasm

Thanks for posting

I have some videos on the subject:

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

911 inside job

Bush crime family and their henchmen along with IzUnreal. May every one of the real murders of 911 be held accountable for what they have done to humanity.


The real players in this

The real players in this were:
Bush Sr.
PNAC et al
The Saud's - primary Bush partner in 911
P-Tek ( spelling ? )
BBCC - BinLaden Bros. Construction Co.
( Bush's, Saud's, BinLaden's, longitme friendships and business partnerships together, all together )

The Mossad agents were just actors with small bit parts.

One potential player has not been implicated in most investigations, but when I mention this name, hopefully it might spark some OMG moments and explain a sudden rise to power of a CIA tool from Kenya. Where was Obama on 911?

RON PAUL 2012 * Restore America * Bring The Troops Home

Bit part: Rudy Giuliani, getting rid of the evidence..

but for major players how could you forget Dov Zakheim? Pentagon CFO at time $2.3 trillion was announced missing from Pentagon, on Sept. 10 the day before 9/11. Good timing, the next day the "world changed" and it was never mentioned again.

Also CEO of SPC, which invented and tested remote "anti-hijack" system allowing controllers to seize control of jetliners from the ground.

HISTORYCOMMONS: October 2, 2001: Remote Controlled Passenger Airplane Flew Before 9/11, Despite Claims to the Contrary (HistoryCommons.org)

A Raytheon 727 lands in New Mexico in August, 2001. [Source: Associated Press] It is reported that the US company Raytheon landed a 727 six times in a military base in New Mexico without any pilots on board. This was done to test equipment making future hijackings more difficult, by allowing ground control to take over the flying of a hijacked plane." [Associated Press, 10/2/2001; Der Spiegel (Hamburg), 10/28/2001]

Zakheim called it the Flight Termination System (LOL):

Zakeim bio.

He was also a member on PNAC.

Zakheim's company, SPC, also had complete knowledge of the construction, security plan, and lay-out of the World Trade Center towers, as contractor for the official investigation of the first WTC bombing in 1993. The investigation was performed by Tridata, a full subsidiary of SPC:

If that's not enough, his father was a confirmed terrorist, a member of Irgun:

I'd say Zakheim and Cheney together had to be pretty close the top, the one we can see (please no Illuminati stuff. It may be true but it's not necessary for the first round of convictions.)

A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali

Jefferson's picture


a list of likely suspects.

9/11 has been used to effectively muzzle many people who needed to speak out at the very least, on how shoddy the investigation was.

Whether you are part of the LIHOP or MIHOP crowd, there were/are still basic flaws that could have been pointed out, without having to commit to a particular theory.
"Blowback" is an easy fallback position, but if a person does REAL research into this area, they will discover that 9/11 was an elaborate game of "let's you and him fight."

Follow the money, and ask yourself who benefits, and you will see a different picture. (not you but people in general)

Now they give the general public tidbits to gnaw on like "Fast and Furious," which is just busywork to keep people distracted from the REAL crimes that have taken place.

actors with small bit parts@

best left unsaid.


i personally...

think that Dr. Judy Wood is on the right track. Hopefully, Gage is for real, and not just controlled opposition. It wasnt thermite/thermate,nano super thermite. It's a new technology that works with molecular dissociation. The tech is out there, patented and all. The question is: are the culprits in the govt or above the govt?

Visit https://soundcloud.com/politics-of-freedom for all recent Ron Paul interviews, speeches, debates, forums, panels, press conferences, news coverage, and Texas Straight Talk updates!

"Terrorism is the war of the poor, while war is the terrorism of