62 votes

WeAreChange: Twelve Confrontations of Bilderberg 2012

12 very powerful or well known elite, media, and corporate, are all confronted, this guy has huge balls, but we need to ask them questions that will corner them, It's great to know people are really waking up!


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


I have to normalize my breathing patterns after watching that compilation. Those are BIG NAME elites. That is some serious high level testimony right there. Damn. Luke and company keep up the great work. I'm doing my best too. Confronted the leaders of 3 of 4 Canadian Federal level parties (Layton, May, Ignatieff) and Harper is the last federal war criminal.

More to come!



Watch this dry yet astonishing Dr. Robert Beck cancer treatment lecture on Google Video - search "Suppressed Medical Discovery" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkiX0jJJozk

I've seen similar youtubes--

the 'we are change' truly have courage--

someone below mentioned that they were rude--

the rude things are said after the car doors are shut--

kind of a safety valve for the pressure--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

I like this guy. Keep up the

I like this guy. Keep up the good work. Super Big Thanks

Federal Reserve Tracts?

Does anyone know of any tract showing how the Federal Reserve Bank works?

I know chick publications makes tracks for religion.

Or any good hand out flyers about how the Federal Reserve Bank works.

I would like to hand something out to people.



Hand out cards/literature or tracks about the Federal Reserve Bank,
To people at the mall,supermarket,church and school or anywhere else
in public.
DO IT!It does work. Remember to put websites and QR codes on your

I'm not sure if I like

Luke (the interviewer) or not. I like how he asks the hard questions, but sometimes it seems like he is borderline pestering them when they don't answer by following them and calling them Nazis and enemies to humanity. I think he might do better by building up to questions about the Bilderberg group rather than immediately slamming them in the beginning. Just my opinion.

One Word


Some of that is good, but

Some of that is good, but following the car with a camera and yelling at the car with a closed window accomplishes nothing.

we are change

We are change needs to act professional and show at least a little respect. They need to be more of an information getting service than just hit piece news. I got disgusted with the way they continually badgered Rand. Rand wasn't hiding. He had 3 or 4 interviews on the topic, so he was responding to the issues being raised against him. If someone isn't going to talk, then ask maybe twice and move on. And Rand was definitely preoccupied with getting to another meeting. If we are change wants to be taken seriously, then quit acting so disrespectful. You can still get many newsworthy reactions from professional work. Being very disrespectful just makes you look like you are a spoiled brat trying to get attention and making a name for yourself.

So I guess

You want We Are Change to be like the groomed Operation Mockingbird Lapdog Corporate Media, which gets memos from the CIA and The Pentagon and six mega corporations who run 9/10 of the media including Clear Channel/Bain Capital which runs every radio station in Minot, ND?!

May I suggest you check out these articles...



And in that second link, yeah THAT Carl Bernstein of Woodward and Bernstein Watergate fame or infamy.

For The Power of The Republic!

If that Interview with J. Rothschild

wasnt news worthy I dont know what is.

FYI- WeAreChange isn't affiliated with Ron Paul, Its time we lift the Skirts of the Fed NOW!!!

His name is Edward Snowden

What is Capitalism?

GOD this has to go Viral

I had no idea what A Bliderberg group even was until i started seeing these awkward reactions to his questions, about even attending a meeting?! whats so bad about that...[15 mins later]..oh

Thumbs up!

His name is Edward Snowden

What is Capitalism?

I'm curious if anyone else

I'm curious if anyone else felt the same as I did after the way Luke R and one of his minions rudely and childishly harassed Rand Paul not so long ago for about 7 minutes after Rand made it clear he did not wish to speak with them? The arrogance of that act(it was uncomfortable to watch) made me no longer wish to watch any of their videos or count them amongst us(or at least amongst me).

I mean, we already have an Alex Jones, do we really need another AJ wanna-be? I'm trying to ask this sincerely: what do these guys accomplish by repeating the word Bilderberg over and over again?

As much as I've despised the Bilderbergers long before anyone heard of this kid, I think he is more of a poor man's Assange or AJ than one of us. I still can't get over the wenneedtobechanged LA chapter who cornered Ron Paul about 9/11 and let him know he wasn't doing enough about it. Their immaturity threatens to set the movement back, and it wouldn't shock me if they were used in the same way Alex is, whether purposeful or not.

I felt the same way.

Luke asks the tough questions, but he goes way too far sometimes. At about 20 minutes in this video, they trap Jill Abramson in an elevator and harass her for like 10 minutes. I feel Luke and his team can often be immature and harass people. He needs to tone it down quite a bit I think.

Yes RonPaulholic, I felt

Yes RonPaulholic, I felt exactly like you did. The hit piece on Rand from wearechange was extremely immature and unprofessional. They were enjoying being jerks to Rand. Even laughing about it. I think that hit piece showed a lot more about some of wearechanges motives than it showed poorly about Rand. Attention seekers. Playing games with people for cheap thrills. Some of their other interviews have been good, so I am not sure what they are doing. Try being consistently professional.

Actually no

It was nice to see Rand challanged on his positions, since afterall they are ever-changing-sounds familiar.

Dr Paul is a good role model, not luke

Im not upset about him being asked questions, but am upset about the childish manner it was done it. I mean absolutely childish.

Again, as much as I put my faith in any person, I put it in the Pauls. I sincerely asked what change luke rude-owski has made, but I already have seen plenty of good Rand has done both over the years for his father, and for mankind in general in the US Senate. I mean have you actually seen the video of luke harassing Rand? That's nothing I want to be associated with. It surely is not how Ron Paul conducts himself.

Yes, that's what I thought

Yes, that's what I thought also. The Rand interview was extremely childish. If really showed how immature that Luke guy can be. In the Rand video, Luke seemed more like an attention seeker than any type of journalist.

One of the better Wearechange

One of the better Wearechange videos I've seen. I like it much better without as much screaming and yelling.

Good job guys.

I love the debate but

Please take a lesson from Ron Paul. Please do explain your side of the debate and do point out where you think someone may be in error. Tell us your opinions. Debate is healthy.

Personal attacks are not.

Pointing out how much time someone has here seems a bit childish.

Yes, there are obvious Trolls here. No need to argue with them. You take the bait when you do.

Keep the real debate going!


I've always wondered why they meet in public places and not some trillionaire's hidden Island LAIR.

Two Thumbs Up

Luke you are a hero. Good job !!

"Its easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
Mark Twain

Voices are scrambled

After just listening to Alex Jones/Mancow piece on scrambling radio signals I watched this afterwards. Notice that Tony Blair interview is scrambled along with a few others.

"We are grateful to the

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years."

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
-- David Rockefeller

I love "We are Change". I would NEVER have to guts to do...

what they do.

Initiative & Courage.

+1. yes, very courageous, they have done research, keep up-to-date news of events, committed to truth & fairness. I have a feeling he /they are doing it on their own initiative, - no party or group has put them up to it. "We Are Change" deserves support.
These are the folks that scare The-PTB, as recorded in their "Protocols", = [There is nothing more dangerous to us than personal initiative, specially if it is backed by genius. He can do more harm than can be done by millions of people amongst whom we have sown discord.]

exposing the secret, or 'sic' rate % - of demons. WOuU


We need to depopulate the Bilderberg Group before they do it to us.


all of them

paulbots support bilderberg and its attendees.

paulbots love peter theil, who is a long-time inner circle of bilderberg group. paulbots hated bilderberg and chided perry for having received an invitation. but as soon as they found out that theil gave a couple of million for lousy violent ads, they now defend and protect bilderberg and attendees like thiel.
who they beat up on are conservatives like perry who are not even part of it like thiel is, but was forced to go to one meeting.


How do you know Thiel is not like

the Ron Paul of the Bilderberg group, trying to steer the global elite from creating their goal of Totalitarian World Government? I know one thing about Perry, he was completely behind the NAFTA Superhighway, which was a Bilderberg/CFR goal. He also has done nothing to stop the illegal immigration on the Texas border. I recall he once put some National Guard on the border for his reelection campaign, then after elected, shot the finger at Texans, removed the troops, and went to Mexico to appologize for his political move. Now, if you can point out what Peter Thiel has done to undermine the Republic, then your point might have some value.

Controlled Opposition

Is what he is.

Let us disappoint the Men who are raising themselves upon the ruin of this Country. John Adams

Perry didn't do the things you mentioned.

perry is not as powerful as you make it seem and he did not do those things you listed. it was none other than the shadow dnc/gop leadership, including folks htat are on romney's team and the cirlce that romney belongs to. by the way, romney is by far worse and he a very close pal of the paul family as you know, and rand is gushing his endorsement of romney as he is 'precisely' what we need.

in the truth of what perry did and what romney did, the two are almost incomparable. romney is the original memeber of hte inner cirlce, like perry has been deceived to be on the outside and made to follow marching orders.

remember, bush team and rove and media humiliated perry and gave he and his family a rough time during the primaries, so establishment does not like him, especially for his comments against the fed and closing down 3 agencies.

this is the problem with rp supporters - when it comes to well-intentioned people, especially cons romney rivals, you do not list the good things the person has done and ignore them. you go on with lists of romney's rivals, but don't do much of the same with romney.

so if you ignore the authentically good, then that means you have an agenda against them that is embarassing to reveal, or rather the leaders you follow within the paul campaign that have been outed recently are the ones against perry and for romney, so you follow along.

perry absolutely was not behind nafta superhighway. it was the bush team who are now all on romney's team and have endorsed him. the bush and obama folks will not allow for much border control - this has been a us policy for decades. and perry and other state governors have very limited control over this. perry has spoken out about this issue on numerous occassions in depth and he is quite genuine about it. while romney on the other hand does not do that - and that is where your concern should be and not on perry.
perry clearly did some things i would not have done like a state gov't vc fund, etc.. but these things are quite small in comparison to what romney has done (ex - romneycare).