We Need Four Armed Veteran Guards For Each State In Tampa
Submitted by attackapathy on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 12:46in
This SHIT is HITTING the proverbial FAN. If you THINK FOR A SECOND that our walk into TAMPA unarmed and NOT BE ASSAULTED you are mistaken.
We need to start a collection of volunteer veteran and police officers for Ron Paul ARMED BODYGUARDS to ESCORT THEM safely throughout the convention proceedings.
We need:
1) Someone to set up a web site for people to sign up
2) A place to MEET En-MASS each day for state delegates to find their assigned bodyguards
3) We need to enter EN MASS as one UNIT to the convention WITH GUARDS not one person at a time
OR
No matter what they will F-K us. We've seen it 1000 times over and over. They will F-K us and they will F-K us HARD.
»
- Login to post comments





go away trolls
you literally have no life, go do something else with your time...please?
I completely agree
It needs to be legitimate as in legal though. Those delegates NEED to be protected, they need assured safety- ALL OF THEM. ALL delegates need to be guarded so that all other delegates wont be treated unfairly and its morally just. if the city of Tampa is bringing in tanks, thousands of officers and machine guns- there obviously aiming their guns at us. we haven't employed anyone to protect or to fight for our beliefs- THEY HAVE. why would anyone from any side of the spectrum want what happened in Louisiana, and elsewhere (Missouri, Oklahoma, Arizona etc) to be repeated?? its completely unnecessary, no one wants to look bad and no one wants to be hit. people need to understand the seriousness of these delegates jobs. they are all LITERALLY wanted criminals to the establishment. they're going to do EVERYTHING in their power to stop us and if you don't realize that you need to start turning around. the reason our upheaval seems so impossible, is that the powers that be want their control, they want their power and no one has taken it from them with any success. if we were in their shoes wed probably want to shut down opposition as well, especially since their entitled to any benefit the mind can imagine-power, money, fame, influence, popularity etc. please BUMP this everyone we need this process to begin now!!
I saw a post on FB last night
It spoke about how tampa is getting ready. Very scary stuff, I will find the post and put it here!
http://winliberty.com/blog/?p=662
May I remind everyone of the "Occupy Mesa Arizona" Incident...
As a response to a Iraq war veteran getting his skull fractured by Oakland, California police deliberately firing a tear gas canister at the vet's head, the Arizona Border Militia positioned themselves between the Occupy Mesa protesters and the Mesa, Arizona police. The Arizona Border Militia were armed with automatic weapons, safeties off, facing the police, backs to the Occupy protesters. I remind you of this incident because NOTHING HAPPENED.
An armed society is a peaceful society. I hope we can get AT LEAST four armed veterans well trained in gun safety for every delegation. I also remind everybody that Governor Scott refused to prohibit open carry in Tampa and Florida has the second toughest "stand your ground" law in the US. Now, if the Florida legislature would just follow Indiana's lead in passing a law allowing private citizens to use deadly force against police committing violent, illegal acts.
“The first American patriot that shoots down one of these drones that comes too close to his children in his backyard will be an American hero.”
Judge Andrew Napolitano
You're probably right.
I don't even think Ron Paul would disapprove personally of an aggressive approach. He's a revolutionary after all. The thing is, he can't say that. He has to say back off and be respectful and all that because of political correctness. But he would be happy, I think, if the people by force put an end to the Federal Reserve tyranny of this country. He just can't attach his name to it.
*edit* I'm not saying you're saying to do this, but the tone of the post made me want to write this. I just don't understand what revolution means if it doesn't involve some kind of serious risky obstruction.
John F