Ron Paul should not go on Howard Stern, but Nick Gillespie should.

I posted this the other day...

To get to the point, it could have a huge impact if Howard Stern supported Dr. Ron Paul, and all for the positive.

I know some may think that Stern’s listeners are some crazies, or dare I say kooks, but they are people just like Dr. Paul’s followers – good, honest, hard working, freedom loving Americans. Ask yourself whose other followers have been called the same names and more.

I know that Howard has a dirty, infantile mind for his on air personality but he's also got children, he's also honest and logical and has millions of listeners.

I believe, from being a long time listener who has sent the Howard Stern Show emails in the past about looking into Dr. Paul’s libertarian, constitutional law abiding, low taxing, system of checks and balances, non-centralized banking, sovereignty protecting, strong military, civil liberty, anti-oppression, peaceful, free market, 2nd Amendment gun rights, local government, freedom loving, self reliance, fiscally conservative, non-imperialistic, transparent government, deliverer and protector of life, free speech message that he would inherently support him.

One thing I think I know about Stern and that is he can smell a rat. Another is his mindset. I ask you Mr. Stern, getting to your radio show’s level, can you imagine how much stamina Dr. Paul must have considering all that he’s accomplished and how many kids he has all the while traveling now from state to state, speaking engagements, interviews, television appearances, doing his congressional duties. But more to the point there is no stink on this politician.

They only need to listen, as so many of us have found (or watch a youtube video or get a handout) to his message that if they haven’t heard about him soon many people will. Yes some of them are fanatical but in large groups of people that happens. Is a sports fan any less fanatical about his team than a politicians or a radio star? What about the other radio announcers, politicians and radio stars that have been caught with drugs or stealing, are their fans any less fanatical? Are they not more dangerous because the people they are following are often hypocrites? If they hear, and I hope they do, and if they listen, which I hope they will they could add so much more to the ground swelling grassroots campaign that there would be a thump in this country and the reverberations may be unstoppable.

Playing on Howard Stern’s ego, I think he would like to be part of that. I think he believes, or wants to believe that is, as he proclaims, the King of all Media, that he has an effect on people. Well show us Mr. Stern. Show us that you have smart, law abiding, peace loving, hard working, free people following you!

Ron Paul is a dignified man. He has character!
Besides, his wife would never let him.
Unlike Barb Bush who let's her 80 year old hobknob with knucklehead Bill Clinton.
I know my wife. And no way would she let me. She would lose faith in Ron Paul if he went on with H. Stern.

Yeah, this is a good idea. If Ron were to go on I'd be afraid of what Howard would ask him.

Why would Howard Stern want Nick Gillespie on his show to talk about Ron Paul?

Ron Paul should go on the show. I used to think otherwise because I thought he an Giulliani are friends. But HS is more open minded than that given his good remarks on Ron Paul. My bad for not thinking HS to be more open minded. Howard Stern may turn off some people, but he will turn on millions more. He's the Anti-Oprah and has done more to champion free speech than any broadcaster I can think of.