The Problem with Lawyers for Ron Paul...Submitted by attackapathy on Sun, 06/24/2012 - 20:53
When you go there... and you click on "who we are" there is not ONE NAME listed. Just a set of beliefs.
I'd much rather see a set of lawyers, their credentials, backgrounds, etc
Having read the actual brief in detail, at BEST they are just trying to ensure that delegates will not be bound. That means there needs to be ANOTHER lawsuit to ensure that DISENFRANCHISED delegates get to attend.
I personally believe that even COUNTY delegates who can show they were disenfranchised should be allowed to attend tampa and vote. As a way to smear the GOPs face in it.
Also, there will be NO ARMED federal marshalls. Because it's not in the brief. Unless the judge orders it. But they do not make that request. So quit harpin on it y'all (as we say in texas).
Personally I love dr. Paul. I stand by his beliefs. But he's timid. And sadly we needed a bulldog to fight back at every stage, not a wise elder saying "be respectful"
As for the LFRP saying "we are taking over the campaign" while I CONCUR with the sentiment, really they are wrong to say that. What is more truthful is... the grassroots needs to represent THEMSELVES in getting lawsuits and judicial orders filed. It is the grassroots who is taking over. LFRP is just one of many helpers in the midst. that is all.
Let me say this. ANOTHER lawsuit filed by the MA delegates WILL get press.
Then ANOTHER filed by LA delegates. That will get press.
pretty soon the american public will get the picture that something seriously went wrong this time. And THAT I think is the most important - The disgrace of the GOP for their evil tactics. They should be so utterly disgraced that they never try it again.