| |
  
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
Well, if the official campaign doesn't care enough
to be prepared, what are we grassroots to do. This scenario was talked about for weeks preceeding this, and yet no one watched the process, and now that the results are in and reported, it's pretty much a done deal, just ask Al Gore. You either have to be prepared for this, or forget it. I'm to the point that even if you find an error......nobody's going to do anything about it. I said it all along, pick about 5 precinct to watch and measure for actual Ron Paul votes without their knowledge, and then compare to reported results.........then you've got a case. I don't guess anybody cared to "watch".
alan laney
http://www.verifiedvoting...
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
We can't let this pass
It is like telling "them" to go ahead and screw us.
They HOSED Obama, absolutely ripped him off. Clinton had conceded it to him.........the exit polls indicated he had her by 10%...hose job.
The powers that be HAD to prevent Dr. Paul from getting 3rd. It was a must! They had to do everything they could to prevent him from becoming a national candidate.
They trot out the newsletter story and ARE STILL PUSHING IT.
Senator McCain was indicted in the "Keating Five" S&L scandal and has other skeletons that are a matter of CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIVE RECORD. Is that in the New York Times on the eve of the primary?
They did what they needed to do to prevent the doc from getting third another 2.7% and he is front page news.They had to do it and they did.
This Sutton NH stuff. Are you kidding me?! Three people have 900 votes to count (or whatever) for dems and reps and they WRITE ZERO next to Dr. Paul's name....what?! He has had 1000 people on the ground with TV and radio for 6 freaking weeks. YOU WRITE ZERO BY MISTAKE?
IT WAS NOT LEFT BLANK...The form had a hand written ZERO.
Tell it to the judge.
T
Unify
Is VegasDB a plant?
Is VegasDB and others who post stuff about truthiers plants?
Davy C Rockett
http://liberty-central.blogspot.com
http://screamfreedom.blogspot.com
http://cystic-fibrosis-symptom.com
http://medical-definitions.com
Why Ask This?
Vote RON PAUL 2008
_____________
Am I missing something // why ask this segway? Was someone speaking about truthiers and/or plants?
And what will you do with the information? Why do you want to know?
I'm a 9/11 truther (I seriously believe in basically opposite of all the things that the official narrative would have us believe) // Do you consider me to be a plant?
Because I believe in 9/11 truth, I still believe that RON PAUL is the best man to put our once wonderful country back on track again. I support him both financially and by encouragement. He has plainly stated he does not believe exactly how I believe things to have happened // BUT HE SURE IN THE HELL SAYS A LOT OF OTHER THINGS I BELIEVE IN.
For one thing we should never have gotten ourselves involved in this war. And we need to bring all the troops home NOW. And the list goes on and on and on (the things I agree with him on) and that's why I intend to vote for him in 2008. We disagree on some things, so what?
I bet you and I might also. This being one of them.
Vote RON PAUL 2008
Hillary Clinton beat Obama
Hillary Clinton beat Obama in the Exit polls. They do not use diebold machines in exit polls.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.
Not true, According to Chris Matthews
The exit polls said Obama won. This is the ONLY indication of fraud in the election. - this was explained as either inexperienced exit pollers , or people lieing to the exit pollers because Obama is black. The exit polls could easily have been in error, but the only other explanation was an error in the results and that seems as reasonable as the other possibilities. If this result occured in Venezuela the state dept would be questioning it.
However, the fact that Obama won the hand count but not the machine counts do not indicate fraud at all, particularly when the vote count is so close. plus you have no demographic data comparisons on these results, - so it is meaningless, and when you make such bad mistakes, it takes away from the real indications of fraud.
Before I read this
Rush Limbaugh talked all day about the NH Fraud. Says he's 100% sure and just that alone will spur damage to the evidence or a 3rd party is looking into it already so me may not have to do anything.
You're kidding, right?
Only Limbaugh would talk all day about nothing. FIN
h-daddy
Yeah, not a smoking gun..
Yeah, not a smoking gun.. but suspicious.
What we have so far is we have real documented illegal activity from Sutton, where they did not "forget to write Ron's total down" but instead wrote down zero. We have the identical thing happen in Greenville with.. (oddly enough) the exact same canidate.
We have a lot of other red flags, like the machine totals and various other things but they need to be investigated to actually find out if there is anything else to it.
Didnt choke, laughed instead
cant believe you want us to accept this as your evidence. ha
que all the hating truther posts telling me to wake up.....
not sure what is wrong with it.....
just simply shows discrepancies in hand counts vs machine counts.....maybe you should wait for FOX to report it..
So?
This proves nothing. As anyone thought that maybe rural areas tend to use paper and urban areas tend to use machines?
If you get your recount and it finds nothing of any relevance will you admit you were wrong or are we going have to go through this every time we lose a primary?
Yeh, I've posted that
thought a few times but it is ignored. And, of course, if folks took the time to actually look at the town by town tallies they would see, easily, that there was no fraud.
The campaign was crappy and the results are crappy. That's a tough pill to swallow.
h-daddy
Look....I am not going to go through this
after every primary. I am just merely pointing out that there are discrepancies......should there be a different percentages for hand counted vs machine counted? I don't think so.
.
.
the Diebold machines are known to not only be inaccurate, but easily hackable......
.
.
There are many who DO NOT want RP to win or even have a good showing. I find it hard to believe that he raised 20 million dollars and has not votes to show for it.......then who the hell donated to him?
bump
read!
Quite possibly the
stupidist "analysis" I have ever seen. Useless. "Proves" NOTHING!!!
h-daddy
bumpin
bump