18 votes

The Strange Case Of Judge David O. Carter (What Turned This Decorated War Hero Into A Puppet For The Obama Regime?)

Judge David O. Carter is presiding over the Delegates Lawsuit.
Think that was a random draw and do you think we will get a fair shake in court even as simple and clear the case is?

(scroll down to see entire article)
Judge David O. Carter was appointed to the federal bench by President Clinton in 1998

(Aug. 22, 2010) — On August 11, 2010, an Appellants’ Opening Brief was filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by Dr. Orly Taitz, in the case Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes, et al v. Barack Obama et al. This appeal is seeking to overturn the decision of Judge David O. Carter of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in an order of dismissal issued on October 29, 2009. The grounds for the appeal are based on an assertion that the “District Court acted with bias, lack of impartiality, and under improper and undue influence from (the) Obama administration.”

The original case was filed on January 20, 2009 on behalf of over 40 plaintiffs, including many retired officers and enlisted members of the U.S. military, Ambassador Alan Keyes (2008 presidential candidate of the American Independent Party), and Gail Lightfoot (a Libertarian Party member and write-in candidate for vice president). The plaintiffs were seeking “a judicial review and declaratory relief on the issue of legitimacy for the U.S. presidency and (the) position of Commander-in-Chief by Barack Hussein Obama.”

The brief goes on to assert that “there is ample evidence of his (Obama’s) illegitimacy to (the) U.S. presidency due to his use of another person’s Social Security number…; due to the lack of his long-form birth certificate with the names of a doctor and a hospital; due to the fact that his mother’s passport records show a different last name for him (Obama); and other records and national data-bases show(ing) him (Obama) using multiple Social Security numbers, several different names, different birthdates, and different countries of origin.”

Full article.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Should be interesting to see

Should be interesting to see how this plays out with a judge who already has a history of crumbling under pressure. I just hope this whole lawsuit thing doesn't backfire on the delegates because of this judge.

Blessings )o(

We would not have a case at all if it were not for...

Robert Gilbert. Robert Gilbert also said nice things about John McCain, who is one of most evil pieces of scum ever to disgrace the United States Senate, and that is saying a lot.

Nonetheless, I happen to believe Judge Carter will rule in favor of "unbound" delegates. Keep in mind, Jimmy Carter's advisers wanted Ronald Reagan to win the GOP nomination because they thought he would be easy to beat.

So, Pollman

Since this Judge is in Obama's pocket:
It would reason that this suit of Gilbert's will surely fail.
That is what this thread really suggests doesn't it?

And therein the excuses will start.
The Gilbert coverup.

He's your buddy, not mine.

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

That is exactly why I posted it Danton

and Gilbert is not my "Buddy" he is just doing a job that should have been covered by Paul's campaign staffed attorneys in the first place. The case as it is written is fine I believe. Gilbert was notified of the above article the as soon as he posted that Carter was to be the Judge.

If Carter throws the case out or rules against it the next avenue will be appeal.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

You fail to understand

Ron Paul needed CREDENTIALED delegates. Many were QUALIFIED, but they were not vetted, or credentialed, becasue there was no one on their GOP central committee, GOP town council, GOP caucus, even if it had empty seats, to vet them. They didn't even go there and try.

If a credentialed delegate got bumped, the RP campaign would help to file in that state where it happened.

Too many of us did not go all the way and work to get a seat. Too many HATE the GOP and won't. Too many wanted RP and his campaign to FAIL in hopes RP would be forced to run Indy or third party.

This law suit is demanding what Ron Paul stands against, and yet, these qualified, yet uncredentialed delegates, rushed to a lawsuit and bashed RP and his campaign for "doing nothing".

There is NOTHING they can do about people who qualify but fail to be credentialed.

Instead, they are being taken advantage of/ set up to be used and bring on exactly what none of us want.. A judge dictating and unsurping state laws, and employing a armed force against Americans at their own event.

Great post. I hope folks read it!!! THANK YOU

Are you aware

that the RNC credentialing committee in Tampa (which I doubt we have any friends there) can on their whim refuse to credential any or all of Ron Pauls delegates? Thats what I recently saw in a video here.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

YES! Absolutely YES

And this is WHY I continue to press the point that it is WE who challange them, by going to these meetings as guests. Having our say, as we can, running against them during elections, and making them petititon, and run for their seat. Challenge them and replace them with Ron Paul Republicans.

As I've said before: The Attorney has a Superseding Oath to

the Crown aka BAR aka "British Accreditation Registry", and is America still a British Colony? Do you really think they are going to allow one of their own agents that's being paid by the Crown get a lawsuit heard on it's merits? Of course it won't go anywhere, they are all in the same club.

And as I explained here, hiring an Attorney "AUTOMATICALLY", in the eyes of the court, makes you a Ward of the State:


I still say, there is a good chance that someone who is not an employee of the corporation, but is sending in money to that corporation (taxes), would be considered a shareholder/investor/beneficiary of the public Trust. And as a shareholder, they might possibly have "standing".


I'm not stating this is 100% fact, or that it will 100% work, but another approach has got to entertained, wouldn't you say?

I mean that "you don't have standing hammer" has got to be hurting everyone's heads by now, right?

Carlin said it. They got the

Carlin said it.

They got the judges in their back pockets.

From a conspiracy standpoint

and from all the negative comments I've seen about the LFRP attorney, I just pray that he didn't REQUEST judge Carter, knowing that the lawsuit would likely be dismissed by him, hence sealing the fate of many of our delegates.

Will be adding our cause to the prayer list.

judges are randomly assigned

in a system that isn't corrupted somehow from above. Gilbert speaks glowingly of Judge Carter having apparently represented clients in Carter's courtroom for many years.

I am fairly confident I heard on a conference call from

Richard Gilbert's mouth that the judge on our case is indeed this Judge Carter.


All judges are in on the take

All judges are in on the take to an extent far deeper then anyone can imagine!

The first time I heard Judge

The first time I heard Judge Carter, this is exactly what I was thinking about too. I'm praying the word I heard that he's a marine and fair judge will be true.

That's easy, a Bribe.

That's easy, a Bribe.

There is no Left or Right -- there is only freedom or tyranny. Everything else is an illusion, an obfuscation to keep you confused and silent as the world burns around you." - Philip Brennan

"Invest only in things that you can stand in front of and pr

He got a call


Bet He Gets Another Call

...neither party really wants any change in the *fixed* election process. So easy to manipulate.

Going up against this would require the heaviest hitting, well connected and respected, experienced team of lawyers around. Lawyers capable of arguing before the Supreme Court IMO.

I wish it were different...but the judicial system is no longer judicial.


Richard Gilbert

IS licensed and Qualified to practice in the Supreme court...just saying.

And Just as We are "Licensed to Drive".

Said "License" does not make one an excellent driver.


"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Richard Gilbert

IS licensed and Qualified to practice in the Supreme court...just saying.

Somebody in

Echo Canyon?

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!