95 votes

Hope Henley, Lawyers for Ron Paul, "...Federal delegates case is up to about 450 delegates..."

[From Facebook}

The Federal Delegates Case is up to about 450 delegate plaintiffs courageously challenging the old guard GOP on the federal statutes regarding the delegate's unbound status. The Liberty Movement is alive and well and we are still in it to win it!




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
northstar's picture

450?

In a way, I hope some are Romney folk who are new to the GOP and realized how dirty they play and want to be unbound.

Real eyes realize real lies

We want our country back

Every year is a year for Ron Paul!

sharkhearted's picture

The PSY-OPS levels on here is just incongruous and astounding

But KNOW THIS you silly psy-ops automatons: You can not win.

Your groupthink "bandwagon" nonsense is groupthink psy-ops error in the first place...so it sinks its own ship.

And the appropriate question to them is, "Where is YOUR lawsuit?" "Otherwise...shut the hell up."

Seriously...in the alternative...what are these supposed psy-ops "liberty" supporters, doing?? Just askin"

Have a nice night.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Sorry for delay, and thank you for your question.

I am actually not at home at the moment and have only just checked in for a moment from a friend's computer.

Of course, your intent is to compare our relative contribution to the liberty movement. I can only humbly submit the following:

As a full-time mother of two and full-time high school English, math, and reading teacher, I acknowledge that my contribution is significantly more modest than yours. I am not a delegate, nor do I have a lawsuit to offer you as a solution for your dismissal.

So what DO I offer Dr. Paul? Well, before the Florida primary I met with fellow RP supporters and obtained a list of "supervoters" in my neighborhood. I printed out dozens of articles and information sheets about all the candidates, and walked my neighborhood, visiting door to door and sharing my thoughts and information with others. Unfortunately, many of the registered Republicans in my neighborhood at that time were either for Gingrich or Romney, but I had a few successes and when we gather in the street occasionally to watch children or pick up our newspapers/mail, my neighbors know where my husband and I stand and I have even fielded a few questions about Dr. Paul's position on Obamacare recently.

I was invited in June to attend an REC meeting, and so I did that. I intend to join that committee when I return from a short summer vacation. I will start out at the ground level, just meeting people and sharing concerns with them, and hopefully I will build a rapport with other Republican committee members and be able to serve in a more significant way in future. As I understand it, this has been Dr. Paul's recommendation.

But now, since you have asked, I must confess an involvement that I fear I may end up regretting.

A few weeks ago as the school year ended, I volunteered my time helping Paul Festival and Ron Paul Billboards locally. I also made a couple of recommendations on Dr. K.'s script for calling voters who may have been disenfranchised in their counties in Texas, and I volunteered to help with those calls (though he did not follow up on my offer of help, probably because I live in FL, not TX.) I don't think that the specific activities I performed for these groups is relevant to your question, nor do I think you want them laid out here, so I won't go into details.

I can only say that like many here, at that time I was deliriously happy with Dr. Paul's increasing success in pulling in delegate support, and I imagined that my efforts would only help him to win the nomination. We all know what happened next. Dr. Paul announced that he would hold his own Paul Rally, Doug Wead offered some thoughts about the L4RP lawsuit that were reserved, at best, and he also said that Dr. Paul needs to think about how best to PROTECT HIS NAME.

Now that comment of Doug Wead's hit me like a ton of bricks. I started reading everything I could find on Daily Paul about the lawsuit, about the Festival, about Dr.K's "research."

And to make a long story short, after seeing some of the tactics on this site, including yours, I am now convinced that Dr. Paul has very good reason for trying to protect his good name from those who would "take over his campaign." Like many, I have grieved over the last year for all the accusations of racism that Dr. Paul has had to endure because of those newsletters.

I am not trying to run some kind of "psyops" campaign. I have to laugh at the suggestion. I am only trying to make sense out of what I see, hear, and read here and elsewhere, and when I put this jigsaw puzzle together I DON'T LIKE WHAT I SEE.

So what is my contribution? Well, first and foremost, from now on I vow to "FIRST, DO NO HARM."

I am being 100% honest here. I don't KNOW what you, sharkhearted one, intend. That would imply inside information that I don't have. I have only called a spade a spade here, on this thread, because it IS a spade. This is propaganda, and you surely know it. That is why you try now to turn ridicule upon me.

I just hope that those reading will consider the facts, do the reading for themselves, and FIGURE OUT WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE, before it is too late. I pray it is not too late.

P.S. I welcome anyone with the slightest concern about my authenticity here to review my posting history over the last month or more. I think it speaks for itself.

Sorry I have to point this out Chris:

You just made a comment about group-think, and then quoted Richard Gilbert.
Group-think in action.

“Where is YOUR lawsuit? Otherwise…shut the hell up”

That is not the appropriate question (followed by interjection) btw, because it's based entirely on the false premise that the person that you are asking, wants a Federal lawsuit ‘asking the court to unbind delegates’ along with the involvement of Eric Holder's Justice Department, in the first place. It's presumptuous, you get it?

Now, you have a mind, and I know that you're a good writer, so formulate your own thoughts, and express them, just don't parrot some thing that came out of the mouth of some hot-head liberal attorney.

FYI: Take a look at how Steve in OK is going about it. That's how to do it, and have at least a chance of success, while on the flip side, if it fails, then you're just back at square-one. The way Richard's going about it, if he loses, then yes, that actually is a setback (despite what he's telling you about how “he designed it to do no harm”)
Yeah, he ‘designed’ it, alright (not even the right word), to do no harm … to him.

Please read

You go Hope!

Thank you for posting this, Hope is a real patriot, great to hear she's getting some traction.

"Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern." ~~C.S. Lewis
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Quite a bandwagon

y'all have got here.

(see my post below)

85 votes up. Impressive. So either at least 1/3 of the average number of DP lookers voted this up in only one day, or there are a LOT of branched account holders (folks with more than one account) here who hopped onto this thread and voted it up.

I think I'll print this one out, just to get a sense of who's who.

this place is rife with multiple accounts

the voting is about as fair as an average gop state convention.

It's funny, the discrepancy between comments/votes

I've noticed that as well. Probably would look suspicious, to have 1-day old members chiming in, though.

Given the Just Announced

Sequel on Dr. K's program tonite that was just announced and has o votes so far...am wondering what will happen with the votes there and who will comment. I'll be watching...............

fonta

HaHa...Same Thought

...I already did!

fonta

Please Provide Bio on Hope Henley

...so we can know if we want to listen to her. That is a reasonable request.

fonta

Please provide a bio on you so we know if you entitled to

ask for her bio and see it.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

I Will Be Glad To

...if you want me to represent you in court. Apples and Onions.

(We do have something in common...I love dogs.)

fonta

Shouldn't that be up to the OP?

It's a reasonable request, so WHY are YOU so DEFENSIVE?

And why so many ID "changes" Karen?ShnauserMom?Shnauser Guard?
I'd hate to be the shoe salesman attending to you. LOL!

FANTA: Notice the "squirming" when reasonable requests/inquiries are made?....that says it all.

Bob-45: Step up to the plate pal, info forthcoming?

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Why Care About What Hope Henley Says

...when I try to research her...all I get is somebody in Florida who is into alternative health care yoga type stuff, Maybe there is another Hope other than the one who lives or did live in West Palm Beach.

However, when I google her, comma, Ron Paul...I get NOTHING except the Lawyers4stuff with her name listed as "one of them." Now the only Hope Henley I can find has a facebook, twitter etc...however there is no indication of ANY INTEREST in liberty or Ron Paul up until we see her name on Lawyers4 and then this "HOPE SAYS.." post which has, indeed, gone out in the internet today.

Has she posted here under another name, I wonder. Did she just answer the ad listed on her twit-thing about how to make money on the internet... Did she ALL OF A SUDDEN become very interested in politics and justice and Ron Paul.

Why should anyone care what Hope Henley says.

fonta

So are you sayiing that because she's not FAMOUS on the

internet that she's not reputable?????? Do you feel that only people who are easily GOOGLED on the internet are reputable?

I have a business, and it is LEGAL and I still do my best to stay OFF the internet search engines.

P.S. For that matter why should anyone care what FONTA says? Whay do YOU say anything at all? What is the point of you speaking? Are you a searchable entity? What does that prove if you are or if you are not?

Romney is searchable; Obama is searchable....look who THEY are. They're on the internet and you can't believe anything either one of them say.

For this reason ALONE, I anticipate that HOPE HENLEY probably has a lot going for her.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

Then WHY Isn't SHE Posting This?

And WHY is Bob-45 her "mouthpiece?
Are you HH?

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

It looks like he read it off her facebook page and noted that

on his post.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

No--I am the true birth mother of the cute doggie on my

profile. I am not HH. I was being chased around by Mary1 so to avoid her I changed my name to SchnauzerGuardian but to no avail; she still seeks me out.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

Not at all, SG.

I am interested in threads about the festivals, the lawsuit, and grassroots activities for Dr. Paul. You just happen to be on a few of them! Hello again, by the way:)

True Birth Mother....

...of your schnauzer?

You know I was getting ready to answer your 70% alcohol argument way, above with another apples and onions analogy plus a court case number that is a matter of record concerning making false claims about products.

However, having now read that you claim to be the TRUE BIRTH MOTHER...uhhm blush.... of your schnauzer I feel almost physically ill.

I am totally opposed to anything genetically modified and, therefore, do not think I would like your dog. Even if it is cute.

fonta

Thanks Karen

But being "chased around"??????
What are you gonna do when you hit Tampa, hide in the ladies room?

Look, if NOT being Famous does NOT garner Credibility.....

Does BEING FAMOUS make a body MORE Credible?

Either supposition is fruitless unless the many factors of reliability, truthfullness, past practice etc are all considered.

EX: Lindsay Lohan's "Credibility": She's FAMOUS!
There are more "credible-anonymous-posters" at DP who are NOT FAMOUS.

See what I mean, jellie-bean?

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Ms. Henley has been an avid Ron Paul supporter since 2007.

Dozens of members of this site know her. She speaks freely with fellow RP people and never asks anything of them. All she does is work on our behalf, tirelessly, selflessly, and continuously.

Do you know how to use a computer? Results of quick Google search "hope henley; Ron Paul:"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0thEhlZuVI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yIjp4mPzWM (2008 with radiofriendly, another long-term DP member and RP supporter)

In 2008 she wrote a song endorsing liberty, here first song ever.

Well My Bad On That One

...so I downvoted my prior post. Ms. Hope is the same one I'd found on Facebook and Twitter...around for awhile.

Since you are so much better than I am at google search, can you give some links to the others listed as *with* Lawyers4Ron Paul especially the lawyer from back when?

I must have been too busy checking if my oregano oil was 100 % pure and unblended compared to the multi-marketing product Oreganol with 30% oregano oil.
http://www.se1.us/health/oregano/comparison.html

I like mine better, but who knows...maybe yours is better.

fonta

Here's something for you to chew on---the best concentration

of alchhol to clean countertops with is 70% alcohol. Did you know that? Why isn't it 100% alcohol? Well--look it up. 70% alcohol is the best.

Do you think this concept could be extrapolated to other areas, like oil of oregano? I think it could be. Interesting isn't it.

So like don't buy his oregano already.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

Here is the text of the federal VOTER INTIMIDATION law

that I think Richard Gilbert is using as his core argument...(don't quote me...I am not the lawyer, now!)

QUOTE

Whoever intimidates, threatens, coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, at any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing such candidate, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

SequoiaTrees4RonPaul

Don't worry if you're not a lawyer,

neither are any of the “Lawyers For Ron Paul”

Wow, After reading this, Anything is possible

I Knew it, I knew all along, I never faltered, I know RON PAUL CAN WIN THIS BITCH!!!

U Betcha!

Up North (bump)

"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_enlistment

There is no duration defined in the Oath