5 votes

Trust Law: Your Rights and How to Enforce Them - Are You Sitting Down?

Do you want to know what's REALLY happening in the courtroom, and how the judge, prosecutor and the STATE are stealing your money; your life; your freedom, and you have no idea how it's happening?

You're fixing to learn how the corporation is using your name in two different jurisdictions; how they are hoodwinking you into their statutory jurisdiction, and how to avoid it:

You can't "Un-See" this:

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2pMJyIikCk
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvKu2UNHQpA
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2GaxlGTyAE

Are they hauling you into statutory court by using the name on the Certificate of Live Birth?

Two documents:

1.Record of Live Birth = Original you will never see again.
2.Certificate of Live Birth = Gov't created document; the other YOU.

Same Name. Two different jurisdictions.

Once people figure this out, it's game over for the STATE. They have no authority over you; it's an illusion; a magic trick, that has now been unveiled.

The Emperor truly has no clothes.

If you do not understand the (E)State that has been created for you by the STATE, you will not; cannot win against them.

Inherent Rights or Granted Rights and Privileges?

NOTE: Please take the time to watch the seminar in it's entirety before spamming the thread with uneducated BS and opinions. Thanks!

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I like

how clear the Canadian Constitution states the facts. It is the same in the United States but more ambiguous.

"The people or sovereign are not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,.....It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound." People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)

In fact I used my SSN and Drivers License that was issued with my birth certificate to get my job. My job pays me in a paycheck and where I endorse that check for payment the fourth line down is not actually a line, it is micro print. Right above the micro print it states "Do not write, stamp or sign below this line". The micro print says "Authorized Signature" repeatedly. What this means is I am authorized or allowed to sign for and receive the currency given to this legal entity that the government created. Since I took the currency I then owe the government tax on it. I am not hired at my job, the legal entity the government created is. The system is rigged because companies are only allowed to hire legal entities created by the government. Through this system our right to pursuit of happiness has been eliminated.

You might find this interesting:

Excerpt: "Those patriots, who finally understand where the IRS, Inc. is coming from; that is, the Uniform Commercial Code contract law, go too far when they insist that the possession of a "Socialist Security number" or having an interstate Federal Reserve Bank account, credit card, a state driver's license, or even a postal zip code, binds the Common Law citizen, by way of contract, so that payment of tribute to the IRS, Inc. is suddenly a contractual obligation. Have you heard that idea taught by other patriots? Think about it for a minute! The government cannot remove all the gold and silver from circulation, and then insist that the use of paper money and checks are suddenly contractual obligations wherein a tribute must be paid for their use."

Source: http://www.freedom-school.com/nord-davis/pardon-me-5.pdf

Then going back to what Dean Clifford is teaching about the "office" they've created in your behalf (the name), I ran across this article which explains the "person" is an office:


I listened to a few more of Dean's talkshoes with Angela Stark, and he reiterates: There has been an office created (the name) by way of the Birth Certificate/SS Card/DL, etc. and the address of that gov't office is your place of residence. But if they want you to do anything other than sit there and watch TV, they are going to be presented with my fee schedule to perform a function of any kind (ie: file tax returns, show up for an audit, etc.), and that for instance fee schedule of $50,000.00 per/min needs to be paid up front, since the gov't can't seem to pay their bills on time; as soon as the fee is paid, he'll be more than happy to perform any function of that office they wish.

He even states you don't really have to have a fee schedule in place; neither of you have ever worked out the terms of employment, so when they contact you, just send them a fee schedule; or bring it to court and demand payment up front.

I would not read too much into that website

It is full of dis-information. The fact that they commonly rename things such as the IRS as 'IRS, Inc.' is a tell tell sign. Go to places that cite their sources and garner your information from the raw sources and develop your legal theories from logic and reason. Do not try to apply legal theories from these kinds of hacks.

How about Congressional Testimonies and

Supreme Court decisions?

We can probably rely on this, what say you?


I agree, a lot of these websites and blogs do have the author's own interpretation of things, one should beware and do their own due diligence. Some are correct in their statements and don't give proper reference or proof, so a little research on the side, will never hurt.

I really don't believe any of this is contracts; unilateral contracts maybe, but not real and binding contracts. There must be full disclosure (which there is not), you must be made aware you're signing into a contract (which you usually are not), and there must be some valuable consideration .... and obligations attached to your already Inherent Birthrights are NOT exactly what one might call "valuable consideration".

Also, I might ask: How can a private - foreign corporation take it upon themselves to issue a currency for all people on the land, and all of a sudden because that is the medium of popular exchange (or forced exchange), they have the right to force you to pay a severance tax or usage tax on the ONLY currency they provide?

Isn't there some kind of law against that? Is that even possible, or legal? Or is that why the 1040 Gift Tax Form is exactly that: A Gifting Tax, that requires your signature to boot?

They can't just tax you on the currency because they just feel like it, or want to. Now, if you're an employee of theirs, that is a different story, but how many of us actually work for the corporation? ... 2 or 3 at most? .... LOL

It says it right in their own code who is liable for the income tax, and I address this here:



We are on the same page here. I am glad you agree.

I do not know about the contracts but I have signed some documentation with my company. I have not read through my w4 at my company fully. It stays in my file and I have very limited access. The point I was trying to make is there is a legal fiction created in your name and it is used as a front by the government. You will find micro print everywhere there is an exchange of Federal Reserve Notes

The IRS, despite what some would try to say, is an agency of the government established under the treasury. It is not an independent corporation or legal entity. The IRS was established specifically to merge several other agencies that manage the revenue generated with trust funds established and held by the US Treasury, namely Puerto Rico, Philippines, and Guam. The BATF which was originally set up for the Philippines is also part of the IRS, the director of the IRS is also the director of the BATF. Their jurisdiction is limited to the United States of America, military bases, and it's auxiliary holdings. Not any of the several States. The United States of America is defined in the Constitution as the 10 Square miles that makes up the capitol in Washington D.C. The legal fiction created in your name is a resident in Washington D.C. giving the IRS jurisdiction over your legal fiction. There is a question to the legitimacy of the IRS since it is an agency created only by the Secretary of the Treasury and last I checked the Secretary cannot create agencies of the government, only Congress can.

On the question about currency, the way I see it is the FRNs always belong to the Fed but you are allowed to use it, so by your use of FRNs is in fact using someone else's property, you can be taxed on the use of someone elses property. It would be absurd to think that free people could not barter with each other even with portions of gold and silver. Why people go to jail for this is because of their own ignorance, clearly the government in prosecuting someone for engaging in barter has exceeded their jurisdiction.

I do like the idea of fee schedules for performing agency functions. I have not filed my tax return so maybe the IRS will send me a notice that I have not filed to which I will send back my own notice and demand to be compensated for performing the governments job in advance. Maybe they will send a copy of my w4 and state that is the agreement. Everything is a learning experience.

My bad, I accidentally posted it in Current Events, but meant

to post in Politics and Law, so I moved it here.