Can the "STATE" be an Injured Party? How about the Prosecutor for that STATE? Can the STATE bring charges against a living Man?Submitted by The South on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 20:51
This is something I've had several people ask me over time, and I've heard it discussed on many internet radio shows as well over the years.
Who is the STATE? Is the STATE someone? Does it breathe? Does it eat? Does it play ball, or dance in the street?
When the STATE brings charges against someone, who/what are they actually bringing charges against? Can a corporation bring charges against a living-breathing man/woman? Is the STATE a corporation?
Can a corporation do business with, or contract with any[thing] other than another corporation?
If the STATE brings charges against You, who is the STATE?
Lets say you were sitting in your driveway in a lounge chair smoking a joint, and a STATE sanctioned private contractor (police officer) drove by and stopped; took your joint; slammed you on the car; and hauled you off to jail, okay?
They run you through their 'system' throw you in a cage for a few hours; force you to bond out, and a week later you get a summons in the mail.
It reads THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs JEREMY G. DOPEHEAD,
Now, who is the STATE OF CALIFORNIA? Is that a person? Is the District Attorney; or the STATE Prosecutor? Is it the entire STATE OF CALIFORNIA that's bringing charges against YOU?
Was the STATE actually in your driveway that day? If so, who invited [it]? Were they there on their own free [W]ill? Were they or [it] hiding in the bushes?
Did your act of smoking a joint actually hurt the entire STATE? Is everyone from the STATE going to show up and testify against you in court? How many seats are in the witness stand? Is there only one or 3 million seats?
Do you not have a right to face your accuser? Was the STATE Prosecutor actually hurt in anyway by your actions? If so, what was he doing there that day? Did you invite him to sit and smoke with you? Was he sitting there with you that day? Was he hiding in the bushes, in an attempt to "bushwhack you"?
Who is the STATE? Is it living? Is it a fictitious entity created by man?
Lets presume for a moment, the STATE is not actually coming after You, the living man, but the other "YOU", the DEAD guy on the Certificate of Live Birth; the all CAPITAL LETTER guy on the Drivers License; on the credit card; on the SS Card, yeah THAT guy!
It makes sense eh? the STATE is a corporation, right? A corporation cannot do business with or contract with a living man, right?
Are they attempting to Administrate an Estate that THEY created on your behalf? Is the Certificate of Live Birth the creation of another Estate? Is it an Office? Are you a person?
The word "person" appears in the 14th Amendment, how many times? What is THEIR definition of "person"?
Lets look up the history of the word "person":
Lets look at the "Office of the person":
Is it possible the STATE isn't actually coming after the living-breathing You, but the 'other' YOU; the YOU that THEY created so they could do business with and contract with YOU?
Who is the Executor of Your own Estate? Who is the Trustee of that Estate? Is it possible to have a Trustee once the Executor has stepped into that Office?
What about the Estate the STATE created for YOU; is that an Office they created in an attempt to hoodwink you into performing in, so they could assume control over your life?
If it is an Office; and you're the Occupant of that Office, then shouldn't you get paid for your time if performing a function within that Office?
Who is the STATE? If the STATE is a corporation, who is the CEO of said STATE? Is it the Mayor; the Governor?
Who would you actually sit down with to go over an employment contract? I mean apparently someone at the STATE feels they have the authority to rule over you if they (it) is/are bringing charges against you, right?
Do their Internal-Statutory codes, rules and regulations apply to you if you haven't entered into a contract with them/it? Does an enforceable contract need two signatures? How about valuable consideration? How about full disclosure? Is the attachment of an obligation to your already Inherent Birth Rights "valuable consideration" or a breach of Trust?
Are they under the presumption you've entered into a contract with them because of Socialist Security or your Drivers LIE-cense?
Is Social Security or a Drivers License a Contract?
Do you know anything about Trust Law and how to Enforce your Rights?
What if the STATE says you MUST hire an Attorney?
Are they under the presumption you're an 14th Amendment citizen or person?
What does a former US Senator have to say about the 14th Amendment?
Is the 14th Amendment just a bunch of BS? Lets watch Bruce Ray Rigg's as he gives you a nice little run down on it, shall we?
Are they under the presumption you owe them tax money? if so, who's actually liable for that tax?
So who is the STATE, and what are they doing meddling in your affairs, and do they have the right to Administrate YOUR Estate? Not the Estate THEY created (Notice Registrar's Signature on Certificate of Live Birth), but YOUR Estate?
Things that make you go Hmmmmmmmmmmm!
Edited July 11, 2012:
When a State Prosecutor brings up charges on someone, as soon as the hearing starts and he/she opens their mouth, have they already violated Rules of Evidence 602, 603, 608, 802 in the first 10 seconds of the hearing (I mean shareholders meeting :)?
Read it for yourself: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/
These people know damn well they have no first hand knowledge; that they themselves were not an injured party; that they are breaking their oaths, and to them, it's all hearsay. But still they are bringing you up on charges and trying to put you in prison for 20 years, by claiming the STATE is the injured party?
Really? ..... The Entire STATE was injured?
Remember: We are dealing with "highly trained and educated" individuals, who should know EXACTLY what they are doing. If they don't know EXACTLY what they are doing; if they don't know exactly what gives them their supposed authority over you; then they must be incompetent, and have no business administrating anyone else' affairs, wouldn't you say?
Could this be why they are using the Trust/Estate/Probate Laws in the courts; it gives them their 'supposed' authority over an Estate? They do have authority over the Estate THEY created, because He who creates Owns. They created the Certificate of Live Birth with the Registrar's signature on it, didn't they?
The only way they have jurisdiction over the living you, is if you have entered into a contract with them knowingly; all cards were put on the table; no hidden agendas; full disclosure and valuable consideration for both.
No contract = No jurisdiction