4 votes

Concrete evidence shows US government nuked WTC towers on 9/11

This is from a reliable canadian website. The canadians have been leading the way on 9/11 truth. I know this will be moved to off-topic but as I have said many times...9/11 is the key to the awakening of the masses.

Foreign terrorists and hijackers didn't attack the US on September 11, 2001 and bring down the World Trade Center Towers – the U.S. government did that using remote controlled military aircraft and planted tactical nukes.

Terrorists didn't take away the freedom, liberty and justice of the American people – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't draw up the Patriot Act, create the Department of Homeland Security, spy illegally on Americans, launch 3 unprovoked armed attacks against 3 foreign states, abolish habeas corpus, kidnap, deport, torture and murder U.S. and foreign civilians – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't loot $trillions from US Federal Tax Revenue and give it to the Wall Street bankers – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't bankrupt the U.S. – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't create the $15.6 trillion national debt – the U.S. government did that ($13 trillion added by just the last 4 of the 44 presidents of the United States – George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Barrack Obama – Obama added $5 trillion in just 3 years, George W Bush added $5 trillion over 2 terms, Bill and Hillary Clinton added $1.5 trillion, George HW Bush added $1.5 trillion) .

Terrorists didn't force millions of Americans out of work and onto the street – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't develop and release the Avian Flu and the Swine Flu – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't drop nuclear bombs on civilian cities – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't murder 3 million civilians in Iraq – the U.S. government did that.

Now tell me who is a greater threat to the American people and to the World – a phantom terrorist group called al Qaeda or the U.S. government? Tell me why would you travel thousands of miles to a foreign country to fight and even give your life to protect and restore their rights and freedoms when your own rights and freedoms are being stripped away at home, on US soil, by your government? Who is a greater threat to mankind? Those who have used nukes against foreign and US civilian cities or those seeking to develop nuclear energy.

The American people went off to war to remove by force the leadership of foreign states that were allegedly a threat to their own people and to mankind. The US government justified their murder of those leaders by claiming they eliminated the threat they posed to the US and to the World. However, after the fact, the evidence showed that none posed any imminent or future threat to their people or to any other foreign state. In fact, the evidence clearly shows the World that it is the US leadership who are the greatest threat to mankind and to the American people. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran have not and have never attacked the US. It was and is the US government who has attacked or is planning to wage war with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran. The US government is the only leadership in the World to use nukes against civilian cities – not just once but 4 times and twice against it own people, on US soil.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bad assed bold faced

Bad assed bold faced accusations that say "the US government" show less knowledge than diddly squat about anything. Yes a conspiracy of traitorous nincompoops prevailed and caused this unthinkable abomination. But that does not equate to "US Government." Better to hone in on the perpetrators than generalize, your effort is noble, your target is on its face, ridiculous.

lol, a gieger counter is all you would need

As concrete evidence.

Which is exactly why no nukes were involved and this is disinfo.

I thought the nuke theory went the way of the ray beam, but apparently someone keeps resurrecting it.

Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:


there was evidence of fallout.

scawarren's picture

Consider the possibility that

Consider the possibility that both thermate and nukes were used. Yes evidence of thermate was found but it alone couldn't produce the molten metal found weeks later. I can't link the video but on YouTube search the name Dimitri Khalezov. Also find a dictionary printed before 9/11 and look up the term ground zero.

It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain


Elite billionaires would not be living in NYC if nukes were used


The nuke thing is so much BS, nano-thermite was proven to do the same thing without radiation.

"OMG use nukes!" is best reserved for Hollywood.

Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:

This little book tells me we were lied to


*May the only ones to touch your junk, be the ones you want to touch your junk.*

Three things 911 Liars can't defend.

1) The Dancing Israeli's

2) WTC7 Collpase

3) Larry Silverstein admitting that they "pulled the building"

*This evidence alone in a jury trial would be a slam dunk.

The government admits the

The government admits the anthrax attacks came from the government.

No one says anything. In a court, when you say you are guilty, you don't need a jury trial, you pass on to the sentence by the properly elected and appointed judge.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

yea...you are right.

The gubbermint also "determined who the guy was" he worked at a gubbermint lab in Virgina. Strangely, after they identified him, they found that he had been killed just three weeks earlier. The whole story is a hoax.

This does not prove the U.S. government did it

It was an international NWO job.

So who made Norad stand

So who made Norad stand down?

Likely the same source that made military security stand down the same day JFK was shot

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

I don't think it's exactly the same

I think it's more of the same but on an international level, as we go into a NWO, the gloabl elites have united their source and forces.

The natural laws of physics

do not lie.

Three buildings fell at or slightly more than 9.81 m/s^2, the acceleration due to gravity. That only happens when a building is rigged to remove any impediments to free fall.

'Splain that Lucy...

(and then there is that annoying fact that no high rise building hase EVER collapsed due to fire, and that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, and that the buildings were designed to be hit by a jet liner...so many anomolies.)

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

Buildings were exploded but no evidence of nuclear devices

The best info on the use of explosives in the 3 towers is from the Arc_hitects and Engineers site.


Once you break out of the hypnotic trance, it's just extremely obvious that the buildings were blown into tiny little pieces using explosives, which had to be preplanted.

Dr. Judy Wood was doing some reasonable analyses of the destruction of the towers until one of her grad students (Michael Zebuhr) mysteriously took a bullet to the forehead in an alleged robbery attempt.


After that Dr. Wood suddenly began to spout nonsense about space weapons and tactical nukes.

The evidence for thermite / thermate is quite strong.

scawarren's picture

Consider the possibility that

Consider the possibility that both thermate and nukes were used. Yes evidence of thermate was found but it alone couldn't produce the molten metal found weeks later. I can't link the video but on YouTube search the name Dimitri Khalezov.

It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain

ae911truth.org is sensible

http://ae911trurh.org is very systematic and scientific in their approach. Some of the theories like nuclear destruction seem to me to be extreme theories geared to make those who question the official explanation look ridiculous.

LittleWing's picture

Patriots Question 9/11

Scroll through this list and read the statements

220+ Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement and Government Officials Question 9/11 Commission Report


If Wars Can Be Started by Lies, They Can Be Stopped By Truth.

Concrete Proof WTC Towers/Contents turned to Nano-Dust in 8 sec

Proof that a Nikola Tesla patent for a Directed Energy Weapon was used by ?? on 9/11?

1) Dr Judy Wood - Proof of WTC Dustification in 8 Seconds

2) Proof the Original 9/11 Footage was Edited
a) Dr Morgan Reynolds
b) Ace Baker
9/11 the Great American Psy-Opera

3) Proof 767's DO NOT Fly at 580MPH at Ground Level
a) Every pilot knows this, including Pilots for 9/11 Truth

4) Proof Fire DOES NOT Melt any Steel
a) Isn't that obvious, check the periodic chart for the maximum temperature of an open hyro-carbon fire. It's 2000 degrees short of melting any steel, let alone 600 Miles of Structural Steel. 98% of which was undamaged and was not heated at all.

5) No matching serial number plane parts have ever been found, no Arabs on the official CNN passenger lists.

* Dustification is a term coined by Dr Judy wood but was described by Tesla is the dis-association of molecules. He also demonstrated his "Earthquake Machine" with his patent called "The Oscillator".

LOL @ Judy Wood being worth citing.

Want a good laugh, watch this, it is painful to watch how ridiculous she is.


Imagine This!

Imagine this is you will...
NY city's largest bank gets knocked off by robbers...the alarms go off, bullets flying everywhere, blood splattered everywhere, people screaming, crying, and it goes nation wide as the cameras roll...and no sign of police to help...nowhere!
After about 35 minutes another bank gets hit just around the corner. It's the second largest bank in NY city and the alarms go off, bullets flying everywhere, blood splattered people come running out of the bank, screams heard everywhere, people falling into their own pool of blood, cameras rolling and people worldwide are viewing this horror on live television..still ......no sign of police!
The robbers escape with no witnesses to describe them other than they accidentally dropped their Islamic ID card while making their hasty getaway.
All this happens ( and much more ) over a period of almost 2 hours without ever one police unit showing up.
How unbelievable is this?
When asked what happened to NY city's elite SWAT teams and other units that failed to respond, they are told that they were having joint Police exercises on bank robberies and thought that all they heard on the news and radio were part of their exercises and that next time they will definitely be more on the alert!
This is an allegory of the abomination of what took place on 9/11 ( but on a much larger scale ) and the total and complete failure of NORAD, and STUPID Americans believe this crap? Really?
Not to mention the Pentagon....the Pentagon....the most protected piece of real estate on the entire planet with the most sophisticated surface to air defence imaginable and they got hit right where they were working on trying to find out where the missing 2.3 TRILLION dollars went by a supposed airliner approximately 1 hour and 35 minutes after the first Tower was hit!
Is there really anyone who actually believes this stuff? Really?

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~

As a Graduate Student in Architecture

I find the official story completely laughable.

WTC 1 / 2 were the first ever skyscrapers of its design, it was over built in every way possible save fire retardants.

It's structure is called a hollow-core tube which often results in people thinking it was somehow frail in nature but the core actually resembles the structure of an egg crate and supplied more than enough vertical strength to stand alone with the cantilevered floors. The exterior steel columns weren't necessary but added for additional integrity both vertically and laterally for wind resistance. You can see the shear strength of the structure by the way it caught the plane and wasn't swayed to any major degree.

The collapse itself could be of any number reasons, but none of them can be deduced to natural failure. Whether it was solely nano-nuclear devices located in the basement/foundation sub structure - which would result in a free fall collapse - or in addition with the other likelyhood of sequential detonations pre-collapse. Either way - it was enhanced, altered, or intended in some way, shape, or form.

WTC 7 is just another example of controlled demolition.

They that give up liberty for security deserve neither.

Or ...

30+ stories of a skyscraper falling down onto the structure due to structural failure because of a huge plane flying into the building.

This whole thing is silly for us amateurs to discuss.

Make the movement about releasing all documents and be done with it.

"The truth is we do not know the truth".

Do you know where that came from?

God Bless.

This whole thing is silly for us amateurs to discuss.

Then lets see what the experts who built the towers had to say about it.

The Seattle Times

Saturday, February 27, 1993

Title: Twin Towers Engineered To Withstand Jet Collision

"We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side," said John Skilling, head structural engineer. "However, back in those days people didn't think about terrorists very much."

Skilling, based in Seattle, is among the world's top structural engineers. He is responsible for much of Seattle's downtown skyline and for several of the world's tallest structures, including the Trade Center.

Concerned because of a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building, Skilling's people did an analysis that showed the towers would withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.

"Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."

Although Skilling is not an explosives expert, he says there are people who do know enough about building demolition to bring a structure like the Trade Center down.

"I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it."


Modern Marvels: World Trade Center Part 5 (HQ)

Interview recorded on Jan 25th 2001

"The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it, that was the largest plane at the time, I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jet liners because, this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door. This intense grid, and the jet plane is just a pencil, puncturing that screen netting, it really does nothing to the screen netting."

Frank A. Demartini
Manager, WTC Construction & Project Management


But hey, what do they know?


The towers were designed to withstand plane impacts - the only argument for structural failure is specifically to fire safety and its inability to maintain integrity - which evidently resulted in fires burning at impossible temperatures to be the first ever cause of a steel buildings collapse.

Toppling is the most likely scenario of specific members failing, a free fall collapse is most likely a scenario of most members failing. That should explain everything.

They that give up liberty for security deserve neither.

There were 47 massive central steel support beams

holding these buildings vertically up. How does the asymmetrical collapse of the material attached to those beams account for those beams being sliced into neat 25 and 30 foot sections, collapsing straight down into nice neat piles of rubble in the buildings' own footprint? Again, if you sliced the top of a massive tree off near its top, you would not expect the entire tree underneath it to explode into dust and splinters. The tree has vertical integrity. So, too, did these buildings, and something tore them down.

"Observe the masses,and do the opposite."

Not that it will do any

Not that it will do any good...but it's a simple case of torsional buckling of laterally unsupported steel with immense dynamic lateral force applied.

There is a reason some people get A's in engineering and others barely pass...not all engineers are created equal.


you fail to grasp even the most basic engineering concepts. If what you say were true the collapse would have been chaotic because it's impossible for everything to fail in perfect timing absent the use of timed charges. Free-fall collapse can only mean demolition charges were timed.

something is twisted all right.....

care to give a clue what provided the lateral stresses?

(sound of crickets chirping...)

No evidence of torsional buckling.

Your model is not supported by physical evidence.

Free includes debt-free!