4 votes

Concrete evidence shows US government nuked WTC towers on 9/11

This is from a reliable canadian website. The canadians have been leading the way on 9/11 truth. I know this will be moved to off-topic but as I have said many times...9/11 is the key to the awakening of the masses.

Article:
Foreign terrorists and hijackers didn't attack the US on September 11, 2001 and bring down the World Trade Center Towers – the U.S. government did that using remote controlled military aircraft and planted tactical nukes.

Terrorists didn't take away the freedom, liberty and justice of the American people – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't draw up the Patriot Act, create the Department of Homeland Security, spy illegally on Americans, launch 3 unprovoked armed attacks against 3 foreign states, abolish habeas corpus, kidnap, deport, torture and murder U.S. and foreign civilians – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't loot $trillions from US Federal Tax Revenue and give it to the Wall Street bankers – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't bankrupt the U.S. – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't create the $15.6 trillion national debt – the U.S. government did that ($13 trillion added by just the last 4 of the 44 presidents of the United States – George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Barrack Obama – Obama added $5 trillion in just 3 years, George W Bush added $5 trillion over 2 terms, Bill and Hillary Clinton added $1.5 trillion, George HW Bush added $1.5 trillion) .

Terrorists didn't force millions of Americans out of work and onto the street – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't develop and release the Avian Flu and the Swine Flu – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't drop nuclear bombs on civilian cities – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't murder 3 million civilians in Iraq – the U.S. government did that.

Now tell me who is a greater threat to the American people and to the World – a phantom terrorist group called al Qaeda or the U.S. government? Tell me why would you travel thousands of miles to a foreign country to fight and even give your life to protect and restore their rights and freedoms when your own rights and freedoms are being stripped away at home, on US soil, by your government? Who is a greater threat to mankind? Those who have used nukes against foreign and US civilian cities or those seeking to develop nuclear energy.

The American people went off to war to remove by force the leadership of foreign states that were allegedly a threat to their own people and to mankind. The US government justified their murder of those leaders by claiming they eliminated the threat they posed to the US and to the World. However, after the fact, the evidence showed that none posed any imminent or future threat to their people or to any other foreign state. In fact, the evidence clearly shows the World that it is the US leadership who are the greatest threat to mankind and to the American people. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran have not and have never attacked the US. It was and is the US government who has attacked or is planning to wage war with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran. The US government is the only leadership in the World to use nukes against civilian cities – not just once but 4 times and twice against it own people, on US soil.

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=68#comment-559



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

So Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth

or ae911truth(dot)org are a bunch of conspiracy theorists ??
There are now 1,700 of these engineers, architects, demolition experts,
physicists..etc who know beyond doubt the WTC was really demolished on 911...When the truth becomes the subject of ridicule here, or "lunatic fringe" sentiments HERE then we've got bigger problems than elections...I suppose you also believe that Deibold computer election systems were set up to eliminate election fraud...I could go on and on...jeezzz !!!

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

fireant's picture

The only thing implausible is the official story

.

Undo what Wilson did

...

Yes, because when one explanation has obvious holes in it, that means ANY off the wall theory is totally plausible.

Idiocy.

Eric Hoffer

ok

I'm not going to argue about it, know this:

Telling people that the government orchestrated the entire thing will turn off far more people than you will get to agree with you.

So why are you getting them to agree with your theory? To join your cause to get back to limited federal government? If that's the case then you are hurting your cause.

Understand that! You are causing FAR more harm than good.

If you want to bring people into the fold, lets stick to the MANY MANY issues that we all agree on, and leave the "out there" theories to our own personal discussions with close friends over dinner and drinks.

I have some of my own (who doesn't?), but shouting them out on the street with a bullhorn, or posting about them on the internet as if they are absolute facts are not going to do myself, or my cause any favors.

It's also important (and healthy), to realize that you may be completely wrong.

G

It is also Important

(and healthy) to realize that YOU may be competely wrong also!

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting"

Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission, who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry, said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."

http://911proof.com/6.html

Are you trying to sencor people here when members of the Commission were frustrated and made the above statements? If so .... why?

ecorob's picture

i lost you at...

"know this"...

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

fireant's picture

You're assuming I have a theory. I don"t.

I just know there are too many questions around the official report to accept it's accuracy. Hiding that in the closet will not help others come to the truth about their government.
I do agree that jumping to conclusions or proclaiming one theory or another harms the issue. We don't know, and a forensic investigation never occurred. But don't take my word for it. Take from someone who knows what they are talking about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TULmL...

Undo what Wilson did

So how does 101 stories of

So how does 101 stories of concrete and steel, designed to take multiple hits by big commercial jets, fall at free fall speed? And how does 50 story Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, how does that fall at free fall speeds into a nice little footprint, not even damaging any buildings around it? How???

And the cash for clunkers program was designed to keep China supplied with steel, and they did it quite well. (and at the same time transfered most of Government Motors technology and manufacturing to China) The sheeple ate that one up too didn't they?

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

"free fall speeds"?

I understand that some things seem strange.

I don't think it looks like a jet crashed into the pentagon, or that field in PA, but you know what, I have to assume it did, because the alternative is 100X more implausible than the fact that it doesn't look like a plane crashed into it.

Sometimes you need to take a step back, take a deep breath, and look at all the things it would take for what you are proposing to be true.

If it seems like the most outlandish and ridiculous scenario that you've ever heard, then it just might be.

G

sometimes you look at what you see..

then you apply some common sense....then you make a decision. Having done this, I am 100% sure that the government's story is bullshit. Because this is very important...I think we need to get the truth.

Over 100 stories of super

Over 100 stories of super reinforced concrete and steel fell in about 10 seconds, all on video, in broad daylight, TWICE. That's about as close to free fall as you'll ever see in skyscrapers that size. Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction! ASSUME NOTHING! I don't have all of the answers but I do know the government lies... alot! Heck, even a majority of the 911 commissioners say the government misled from the beginning. How much more proof does someone need?

While you are thinking about how insane or "implausible" this is, YouTube Building 7. Most people don't even know that 3, NOT 2 buildings, fell (at free fall speeds) on that day!!!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Exactly....

If fire from kerosene (jet fuel) and office debris were sufficient equipment to bring a steel-frame building neatly down into its footprint, then why the need for the intensely sophisticated demolition industry? And all its fancy crews and engineering techniques? Why not, when a building needs tearing down, just spread some jet fuel on a few floors, light a match, and stand back for an hour or two? The notion is, of course, absurd. So why is it not also absurd in the case of the Twin Towers - which were designed specifically to support the impact of an airplane?

"Observe the masses,and do the opposite."

Where is this idea that the

Where is this idea that the towers landed "neatly down into its footprint"...debris was thrown every where...or were all those ariel photographs photoshopped and given to the media to cover it all up?

YouTube building 7. It most

YouTube building 7. It most definitely fell into a nice neat little pile, not hitting any other building near it, AND it wasn't hit with an airplane. The towers however had tons of I-Beam thrown out hundreds of feet. That takes more than jet fuel. Google the internets and you'll find the truth

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

ecorob's picture

yeah, i do think that!

actually, its not the "government"...its dick cheney and donald rumsfeld and henry kissinger and geaorge bush, senior

next question

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

This is disinformation

Designed to discredit.

Unconventional Nukes is what I'm refering to guys...

We now in the Age Of The Micro Nuclear Device. Interestingly, these devices don’t look much different than conventional large explosive devices except they’re quite small, and far more importantly they’re designed using a fission/fusion hybrid detonation mechanism which reduces residual radiation in three significant ways. First, total radiation is reduced by 97-99% and second, residual radiation dissipates in just days, a week at the most. Last, moisture, rain, flooding or water of any kind also rapidly reduces the radiation to almost undetectable levels.

The international nuclear treaties covered pure fission of plutonium and uranium. They do not cover hybrid fusion triggered fission devices. The military industrial complex and influential wealthy criminal cabals needed to develop weapons that weren’t covered under international treaties and thus could be used with impunity. This was done. Micro sized fusion triggered fission devices work perfectly and aren’t covered by international treaties.

A fusion triggered fission device detonates in less than 600 billionths of a second; approximately 550 billionths for the fusion process and 50 billionths for the fission, and sometimes much less. The fusion boost increases total yield many fold yet reduces overall radiation output.

ecorob's picture

hey, go213mph...

why can't/won't people see this?

its all about this...

it ain't rocket science, its a fission/fusion hybrid detonatation

its very common...miliarily-speaking of course, and easily seen in all of the test photos, as well as 9/11 photos

Its not just Ron Paul/2012 anymore

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Hmmm

Wouldn't it have been easier to just fly some huge passenger planes into them?

Eric Hoffer

ecorob's picture

that still won't...

bring the buildings down!

the architect is rolling in his grave to think that you would accuse him of building a building that a mere jet fueled plane could bring down in a crumbling and pulverized dusty heap

PREPOSTEROUS!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

why

in the hell would they ALSO have to bring the buildings down!?

They wouldn't! The attack was bad enough to accomplish everything they would want (if the gov was behind it all).

I understand building 7 was very suspicious, but when...awww hell. Answer this for me:

What did they do with all the passengers on the 4 "airliners"?

hhhhhmmmmmmmm??????

G

Because

1) The Towers were white elephants.......

2) They were filled with asbestos

3) They were given a time limit to remove the asbestos

4) It was extremely expensive and difficult to remove thhe asestos

5) The wiring was antiquated and not up to speed for the Wall Street brokers who rented office space there.

6) Silverstein had just signed a 99 year lease on July 29, 2001 approximately 6 weeks prior to the 911 attack. He took out insurance against a Terrorist attack.

7) Silerstein et al's investimet was $129 million

8) He received $4.5 Bilion from his insrance coverage!

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html

These are FACTS.........not speculations.

Eric

According to Pilots for 911 truth and many other ex military pilots it would be virtually impossible to keep the engines running on a 747 so low to the grown. I'm not an engineer so I don't know the specifics but it has something to do with air density. But, the pilots said, if the rpms were kept high enough to keep the engines running the next issue would be how incredibly difficult it would be to control such a large, heavy plane at that speed and altitude to make a dirct hit on the WTC buildings. One pilot said he tried hitting the building in a simulator and he missed the WTC 9 out of 10 times. That's why I think an auto pilot must have been engaged.

If you really want to know about all the things you are curious about, spend some time doing the research. All the answers to your questions are in the public domain.

I worked as a network adminstrator on a local Air Force Base from 2000-2010. At no time during my time on base did I EVER think the 9/11 conspiracy theories were anything but a bunch of bunk. But, thats because I trusted my government and at the time I would have told anyone that said 9/11 was not what we were told, that they were a lunatic.

When I got laid off...I was unemployed for nearly a year and didn't have much to do other than sit behind my computer and fill out online job apps and research things I had always been interested in. 9/11 was not one of them. I wanted to know more about how the 2008 financial crisis happened. I wanted to know more about the history of money and banking. I wanted to learn about the orgins of government and the orgins of religion.

Researching those things occasionally sent me to sites where alternate views about 9/11 were offered. For the longest time I just ignored them...but I think it was the interview with Larry Silverstein about building 7 and his comment to tell them to "go ahead and pull the building" and then watching bldg 7 free fall into it's own footprint that made me think hum, what if?

I know of no one that has spend more than 10 - 20 hours researching 9/11 who still beleives the offical story.

I no longer waste my time trying to convince people like you who want to shoot down everything I put forward...I honestly could care less if you choose to beleive that our Government has been open and honest about 9/11. There are lots of people that still need to wake up to what's happened...to wake up to the truth...and for me to spend valuable time on people with closed minds and choose to ignore professionals who have done tests, provided logical reasons and explainations behind the attacks of 9/11 is pointless. One day everyone will know. Hopefully it will be sooner rather than later but 80-90% of Americans listen to our leaders lie to their face day after day and The FED steals money from the unborn but by God the people refuse to think that our wonderful leaders would sink to such levels.

It's quite remarkable.

Because

That's because you're trying to do the "Official Story" dance.

The commission report was written by a bunch of bureaucrats trying to cover up the fact that their worthless behinds failed to do their job. It's just a big CYA document.

That DOESN'T mean that any fly by night absurdity like, "oh yes, it was brought down by nukes" works.

I have heard the following:

It wasn't planes, it was thermite.
It wasn't planes, it was nano-thermite that burns horizontally.
It wasn't planes, it was the bombs that were put in the building beforehand.
It wasn't planes, it was a missile that looked like a plane and the images were doctored later.
It wasn't planes, it was a nuclear bomb.
It was planes, but they were piloted by professional government agents.
It was planes, but it was the Israeli's, not the Saudis.
It was planes, but the government let it happen.
It was planes, some people in the government thought it might happen, but it got lost in the bureaucratic shuffle of idiots looking for promotions on the taxpayer's dollar and not doing their job.

The last one is the Ron Paul hypothesis. Of them all, I'd say the last one is the most likely, and I wouldn't rule out the second to last. I can definitely see some jerk letting the attack happen so we can launch a war back in retaliation.

Come on though. Nukes. Really?

Eric Hoffer

Be careful with the common sense,

I'm finding out it doesn't play well with a lot of this crowd. I love how people can think that our government, that can't fix roads or deliver mail effectively, was somehow able to pull off the greatest conspiracy theory attack in the history of the world. I work for the government; we're not that clever! I really think that some folks here are wearing tin-foil hats, and it never ceases to amaze me how they can claim to support a level-headed person like Ron Paul.

Linda Cross's picture

edited..

away

If you see something, say something, the government is listening.
Silence isn't golden, it's yellow.

You just admitted to being

You just admitted to being not that "clever", yet call anyone who questions the offical lie a tin foil hat type. Geeezus.

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Too Dumb

Too dumb to get me my mail, but able to pull off a massive conspiracy involving thousands of people with not a single person speaking out.

Sounds reasonable.

My favorite is, "Ron Paul believes this too! He says specifically numerous times the opposite, but that's just because he's in government and doesn't want to get drummed out for saying what he believes. Paul is just such a get along to go along sort of guy."

Eric Hoffer

I have been using the Postal

I have been using the Postal Service in my business for about 25 years and have never had a letter not get to me. I also have done mailings around the world and our postal system is the best by far.

Also, many people have spoken out. Check it out online, it's not on the teevee though.

YouTube Building 7. How does a 50 story super reinforced concrete and steel building, that was not hit by an airplane, fall at free fall speeds? How Mr. Hoffer?

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Glad to hear it

Meanwhile, my shipment of sensors due to me from Hong Kong went to Port Huron and were delayed for 7 weeks.

I'm glad to hear your experience with the postal system has been the best ever. Please lend me your postman, you can have mine.

Eric Hoffer